Outcomes and Safety of Fluoroless Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND

Intracardiac echocardiography and 3D mapping systems allow catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) to be conducted without fluoroscopy; however, the safety and effectiveness of fluoroless AF ablation are not well defined.

METHODS

We examined consecutive radiofrequency AF catheter ablations at a large academic teaching hospital from November 2017 to July 2019. Outcomes for fluoroscopy-guided (N = 176) and fluoroless (N = 147) ablations were compared. Cases were designated as fluoroless at the outset of the procedure.

RESULTS

Mean age was 59.5 ± 10 years, 66.9% were male, 71.8% had paroxysmal AF, and the mean CHADS-VASc score was 1.7 ± 1.4. There were no differences in patient baseline characteristics. In the fluoroless group, minimal fluoroscopy was used in 17 patients (median, 3 seconds; interquartile range, 1.2-4.8). Mean procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and radiation dose (± standard deviation) were greater in the fluoroscopy group compared with the fluoroless group (194 ± 56 vs 176 ± 46 minutes,  = 0.0021; 10.7 ± 6.6 vs 0.008 ± 0.03 minutes, < 0.0001; 2759.2 ± 1911 vs 5.4 ± 24 μGy m, < 0.0001). In multivariable linear regression models, fluoroless AF ablation was independently associated with reduced procedure times (ß = -16.5 minutes,  = 0.01). Acute procedural success (95.5% vs 98.6%,  = 0.1), complication rates (4.5% vs 2.0%,  = 0.24), and 1-year AF recurrence rates (28.7% vs 27.1%, log-rank  = 0.69) were similar between fluoroscopy and fluoroless groups. Excluding the 17 patients receiving fluoroscopy in the fluoroless group did not impact our results ( = 0.013). After exclusion of redo cases, fluoroless AF ablation was no longer associated with reduced procedure times (ß = -11.4 minutes,  = 0.106).

CONCLUSIONS

Fluoroless radiofrequency AF ablation had similar effectiveness and safety compared with conventional fluoroscopy-guided AF ablation.