• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用拉施模型评估工作不稳定量表的结构效度

Evaluation of the Structural Validity of the Work Instability Scale Using the Rasch Model.

作者信息

Lu Ze, Vincent Joshua I, MacDermid Joy C

机构信息

School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021 Jan 13;3(1):100103. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100103. eCollection 2021 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100103
PMID:33778476
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7984990/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To use Rasch analysis to examine the measurement properties of the 23-item version of the Work Instability Scale (WIS-23) in a sample of worker compensation claimants with upper extremity disorders.

DESIGN

Secondary data analysis on the data retrieved from a cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Tertiary care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients (N=392) attending a specialty clinic for workers with upper limb injuries at a tertiary hospital were prospectively enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

WIS-23.

RESULTS

The study sample contained 392 participants between the ages of 19 and 73 years (mean, 47.0±10.5y). There were 148 (37.8%) women, 182 (46.4%) men, and 62 (15.8%) participants for whom sex identification was unavailable. The initial WIS data analysis showed significant misfit from the Rasch model (item-trait interaction: χ=293.52; <.0001). Item removal and splitting were performed to improve the model fit, resulting in a 20-item scale that met all assumptions (χ=160.42; =.008), including unidimensionality, local independence of items, and the absence of differential item function based on age, sex of respondents, employment type, and affected upper extremity area across all tested factors.

CONCLUSION

With the application of Rasch analysis, we refined the WIS-23 to produce a 20-item WIS for work-related upper extremity disorders (WIS-WREUD). The 20-item WIS-WREUD demonstrated excellent item and person fit, unidimensionality, acceptable person separation index, and local independency. The WIS-20 may provide better measurement properties, although longitudinal psychometric evaluations are needed.

摘要

目的

运用拉施分析检验工作不稳定量表23项版本(WIS - 23)在患有上肢疾病的工伤索赔者样本中的测量属性。

设计

对横断面研究中检索到的数据进行二次数据分析。

设置

三级护理医院。

参与者

前瞻性纳入在一家三级医院上肢损伤工人专科门诊就诊的患者(N = 392)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要结局指标

WIS - 23。

结果

研究样本包含392名年龄在19岁至73岁之间的参与者(平均年龄47.0±10.5岁)。其中有148名(37.8%)女性,182名(46.4%)男性,62名(15.8%)参与者性别信息缺失。WIS的初始数据分析显示与拉施模型存在显著失配(项目 - 特质交互作用:χ = 293.52;P <.0001)。进行了项目删除和拆分以改善模型拟合,得到一个满足所有假设的20项量表(χ = 160.42;P = 0.008),包括单维度性、项目局部独立性,以及在所有测试因素(年龄、受访者性别、就业类型和受影响的上肢区域)上不存在项目功能差异。

结论

通过应用拉施分析,我们对WIS - 23进行了优化,生成了一个用于与工作相关上肢疾病的20项WIS(WIS - WREUD)。20项的WIS - WREUD显示出良好的项目和人员拟合、单维度性、可接受的人员分离指数以及局部独立性。尽管需要进行纵向心理测量评估,但WIS - 20可能具有更好的测量属性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b8/7984990/90790f1601dc/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b8/7984990/b06ca250f19a/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b8/7984990/5d7354665861/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b8/7984990/fcb78b6f428b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b8/7984990/e90797ed4770/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b8/7984990/90790f1601dc/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b8/7984990/b06ca250f19a/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b8/7984990/5d7354665861/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b8/7984990/fcb78b6f428b/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b8/7984990/e90797ed4770/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b8/7984990/90790f1601dc/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Structural Validity of the Work Instability Scale Using the Rasch Model.使用拉施模型评估工作不稳定量表的结构效度
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021 Jan 13;3(1):100103. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100103. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Rasch analysis informed modifications to the Work Instability Scale for Rheumatoid Arthritis for use in work-related upper limb disorders.Rasch 分析对类风湿关节炎工作不稳定性量表进行了修改,以便用于与工作相关的上肢疾病。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1242-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 May 6.
3
An Evaluation of the Structural Validity of the Work Limitation Questionnaire Using the Rasch Model.工作限制问卷的结构效度评价:使用 Rasch 模型。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Apr;102(4):633-644. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.11.009. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
4
The Work Instability Scale for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA-WIS): Does it work in osteoarthritis?类风湿关节炎工作不稳定性量表(RA-WIS):它在骨关节炎中有用吗?
Qual Life Res. 2010 Sep;19(7):1057-68. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9656-y. Epub 2010 Apr 25.
5
Disease-related differential item functioning in the work instability scale for rheumatoid arthritis: converging results from three methods.疾病相关的差别项目在类风湿关节炎工作不稳定量表中的功能:三种方法的结果趋于一致。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Aug;63(8):1159-69. doi: 10.1002/acr.20491.
6
Rasch validation of the Arabic version of the lower extremity functional scale.下肢功能量表阿拉伯语版本的拉施验证
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Feb;40(3):353-359. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1254285. Epub 2016 Nov 20.
7
Adaptation and validation of the Ankylosing Spondylitis Work Instability Scale (AS-WIS) for use in Turkey.强直性脊柱炎工作不稳定性量表(AS-WIS)在土耳其的适应性调整与验证。
Rheumatol Int. 2015 Jan;35(1):125-31. doi: 10.1007/s00296-014-3050-y. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
8
Adaptation and cross-cultural validation of the rheumatoid arthritis work instability scale (RA-WIS).类风湿关节炎工作不稳定性量表(RA-WIS)的适应性及跨文化验证
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Nov;68(11):1686-90. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.098921. Epub 2008 Dec 15.
9
The Foot Posture Index: Rasch analysis of a novel, foot-specific outcome measure.足部姿势指数:一种新型足部特异性结局指标的拉施分析
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jan;88(1):88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.005.
10
Rasch validation of a new scale to measure dependency in arm use in daily life: the Upper Limb Lucerne ICF-based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale.一种用于测量日常生活中上肢使用依赖性的新量表的Rasch验证:基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的上肢卢塞恩多学科观察量表
Front Neurol. 2023 Jul 10;14:1154322. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1154322. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing ChatGPT's Capability for Multiple Choice Questions Using RaschOnline: Observational Study.使用RaschOnline评估ChatGPT回答多项选择题的能力:观察性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Aug 8;8:e46800. doi: 10.2196/46800.
2
Measurement Invariance of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index: Evidence from 15 European Countries.世界卫生组织-5 幸福指数的测量不变性:来自 15 个欧洲国家的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 9;19(16):9798. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169798.

本文引用的文献

1
Agreement between original and Rasch-approved neck disability index.原始与 Rasch 认可的颈部残疾指数之间的一致性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jul 3;20(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01069-w.
2
Critical Values for Yen's : Identification of Local Dependence in the Rasch Model Using Residual Correlations.严氏临界值:使用残差相关性识别拉施模型中的局部依赖性
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 May;41(3):178-194. doi: 10.1177/0146621616677520. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
3
An evaluation of the structural validity of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) using the Rasch model.
采用Rasch 模型评估肩痛与残疾指数(SPADI)的结构有效性。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):389-400. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1746-7. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
4
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
5
The Manual Work Instability Scale: development and validation.《体力劳动不稳定性量表》的编制与验证。
Occup Med (Lond). 2016 Jun;66(4):300-4. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqv217. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
6
Improving the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire using Rasch analysis.运用拉施分析改进个体工作绩效问卷。
J Appl Meas. 2014;15(2):160-75.
7
Is the pain visual analogue scale linear and responsive to change? An exploration using Rasch analysis.疼痛视觉模拟量表是否呈线性且对变化有反应?一项使用拉施分析的探索。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 12;9(6):e99485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099485. eCollection 2014.
8
Do outcomes differ between work and non-work-related injury in a universal injury compensation system? Findings from the New Zealand Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study.在统一的工伤赔偿体系中,与工作相关和非工作相关的伤害结果是否存在差异?来自新西兰伤害前瞻性结果研究的发现。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Oct 22;13:995. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-995.
9
Is Rasch model analysis applicable in small sample size pilot studies for assessing item characteristics? An example using PROMIS pain behavior item bank data.拉施模型分析是否适用于评估项目特征的小样本量预试验研究?以患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)疼痛行为项目库数据为例。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Mar;23(2):485-93. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0487-5. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
10
A brief 5-item version of the Neck Disability Index shows good psychometric properties.一个简短的 5 项版本的颈部残疾指数显示出良好的心理测量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Jul 1;11:108. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-108.