Suppr超能文献

钆基对比剂可提高 MRI 对复发性软组织肉瘤的检出率。

Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents Improve Detection of Recurrent Soft-Tissue Sarcoma at MRI.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Unit 1475, Houston, TX 77030 (B.A., W.A.M., T.M.H., R.K., K.W.M., J.E.M., B.M.M., C.M.C.); and Department of Biostatistics, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio (W.W.).

出版信息

Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2020 Mar 27;2(2):e190046. doi: 10.1148/rycan.2020190046. eCollection 2020 Mar.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the diagnostic efficacy of gadolinium-based contrast agents for the detection of recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma compared with non-contrast-enhanced conventional MRI sequences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with soft-tissue sarcomas who were imaged from January 2009 to December 2014 was performed. MRI studies from 69 patients (mean age, 61 years ± 15 [standard deviation], 45 men) with recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma and 63 age-, sex-, and tumor-matched controls with positive findings (nonrecurrence) were presented to six musculoskeletal radiologists at a tertiary cancer center in three image groupings. Group 1 consisted of precontrast T1-weighted and fat-suppressed T2-weighted images (no contrast agent). Group 2 consisted of precontrast and postcontrast fat-saturated T1-weighted images. Group 3 consisted of precontrast and fat-saturated postcontrast T1- and fat-suppressed T2-weighted images. Images within these three groups contained either recurrent soft-tissue sarcomas or positive postoperative findings (nonsarcoma). The presentation order of the first two image sets was reversed for half the readers. The readers were asked to classify presence of tumor on a five-point scale. The average score from the readers was used as consensus score for each case, and a case was considered positive if the average score was less than 3. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed using the average score for each image set.

RESULTS

Assessment of the group 3 image set resulted in higher sensitivity (74%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 62%, 83%) than the group 2 image set (64%, 95% CI: 51%, 75%), which was also more sensitive than the assessment of the group 1 images set (49%, 95% CI: 37%, 61%), with = .02 for both. There was no significant difference in specificity between the three groups. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the assessment of group 1 was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.86), which was significantly lower than that of group 2, 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.96) and group 3, 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.97), with values of .0006 and < .0001, respectively. There was no difference between the AUCs of groups 2 and 3 ( = .58).

CONCLUSION

Gadolinium-based contrast agents improved diagnostic performance in detection of recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma. Addition of fat-saturated T2-weighted images provided modest improvement in sensitivity. Efficacy Studies, MR-Contrast Agent, Oncology, Soft Tissues/Skin© RSNA, 2020.

摘要

目的

比较钆对比剂增强与非对比增强常规 MRI 序列在检测复发性软组织肉瘤中的诊断效能。

材料与方法

回顾性分析 2009 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月期间在一家三级癌症中心就诊的 69 例复发性软组织肉瘤患者(平均年龄 61 岁±15[标准差],45 例男性)和 63 例年龄、性别和肿瘤匹配的阳性发现(无复发)患者的 MRI 资料。63 名肌肉骨骼放射科医生在三个图像组中对这些患者的 MRI 资料进行评估,每个图像组均包含复发性软组织肉瘤或阳性术后发现(非肉瘤)。63 名放射科医生对每个患者的 3 个图像组(钆对比剂增强前 T1 加权和脂肪抑制 T2 加权图像[无对比剂]、钆对比剂增强前后脂肪抑制 T1 加权图像、钆对比剂增强前后脂肪抑制 T1 和 T2 加权图像)的肿瘤存在情况进行五分制评分。前两组图像的呈现顺序对一半的读者进行了反转。读者被要求对肿瘤的存在情况进行五分制评分。每个病例的平均评分作为共识评分,若平均评分<3,则认为该病例为阳性。使用每个图像组的平均评分进行受试者工作特征(ROC)分析。

结果

与评估组 2 图像组(64%,95%CI:51%,75%)相比,评估组 3 图像组(74%,95%CI:62%,83%)的敏感性更高,组 2 图像组的敏感性也高于组 1 图像组(49%,95%CI:37%,61%),差异均具有统计学意义(均为 =.02)。三组间的特异性无显著差异。组 1 图像评估的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.78(95%CI:0.70,0.86),显著低于组 2(0.92,95%CI:0.87,0.96)和组 3(0.93,95%CI:0.88,0.97),差异均具有统计学意义(均为 =.0006 和<.0001)。组 2 和组 3 的 AUC 之间无差异( =.58)。

结论

钆对比剂增强提高了复发性软组织肉瘤的检测诊断效能。添加脂肪抑制 T2 加权图像可适度提高敏感性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Influence of clinical history on MRI interpretation of optic neuropathy.临床病史对视神经病变MRI解读的影响。
Heliyon. 2016 Sep 16;2(9):e00162. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00162. eCollection 2016 Sep.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验