University of Texas at Austin.
Department of Psychology.
J Couns Psychol. 2021 Jul;68(4):371-389. doi: 10.1037/cou0000540. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
In this study, we conducted a citation network analysis of the to elucidate the scope, evolution, and interconnections of publications as reflected in how authors use (i.e., cite) these publications. We used CitNetExplorer to analyze a network of 4,718 publications and 16,959 citation links. The analysis yielded 19 clusters in 's citation network. The most dominant facet of the citation network focused on counseling, counseling process, and counseling outcome. The clusters in this facet shifted from an early focus on perceptions of counselors to continuing examinations of what happens in counseling. Another dominant facet comprised clusters on vocational psychology, shifting from an earlier focus on vocational choice and interest, to career counseling and decision making, to vocational and academic development processes and predictors. These major facets converged toward a continuing cluster focused on methodology and analysis along with race, gender, sexuality, and other diversity scholarship. This suggests that diversity-focused publications in often employ and cite methodological and analytic advances. The results also reveal discontinued areas of scholarship in that are ripe for revisiting and rebuilding in new directions (e.g., anger and social justice activism; clinical judgment and artificial intelligence). The results suggest that a promising next step in the evolution of would be for authors to engage with and cite diversity scholarship as central to "general" domains of scholarship. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
在这项研究中,我们对进行了引文网络分析,以阐明其出版物的范围、演变和相互联系,这反映在作者如何使用(即引用)这些出版物上。我们使用 CitNetExplorer 分析了一个包含 4718 篇出版物和 16959 条引文链接的网络。该分析在的引文网络中产生了 19 个聚类。引文网络最主要的方面侧重于咨询、咨询过程和咨询结果。这个方面的聚类从早期对咨询师的看法的关注,转变为对咨询中发生的事情的持续研究。另一个主要方面包括职业心理学的聚类,从早期对职业选择和兴趣的关注,到职业和决策咨询,再到职业和学术发展过程和预测。这些主要方面朝着一个持续关注方法论和分析以及种族、性别、性取向和其他多样性研究的聚类汇聚。这表明,在中,关注多样性的出版物经常采用和引用方法论和分析方面的进展。研究结果还揭示了中一些已经停止的研究领域,这些领域适合重新审视并以新的方向重建(例如,愤怒和社会正义行动主义;临床判断和人工智能)。研究结果表明,在的发展中,下一步很有希望的做法是让作者参与并引用多样性研究,将其作为“一般”领域的研究的核心。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。