Alfred Mental and Addiction Health, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Epworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Epworth Healthcare and Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;22(9):647-669. doi: 10.1080/15622975.2021.1907710. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a well-established and effective treatment for depression, though response rates are suboptimal. Personalising TMS for depression with neuroimaging can take into account inter-individual differences in anatomical and electrophysiological characteristics; and thereby provide a potentially more efficacious form of treatment. The current systematic review aimed to critically appraise the literature relating to personalising TMS for depression with neuroimaging.
PubMed, PsycINFO and Embase databases were used to identify relevant literature published up to November 2020.
A total of 37 studies were included in the review. Across these studies, a total of 1451 patients with depression received TMS that was personalised using neuroimaging. The majority of the studies used structural or functional neuroimaging to personalise treatment target ( = 30), primarily through neuronavigation methodologies. Fewer studies used electroencephalography to personalise treatment frequency or stimulus timing ( = 7). Only 6 studies directly compared neuroimaging-personalised TMS to standard TMS.
The findings from this review suggest that personalising TMS with neuroimaging may be more effective in the treatment of depression compared to standard TMS. Further research is required to directly compare neuroimaging-personalised TMS with standard TMS, and to identify the optimal parameters for treatment personalisation.
经颅磁刺激(TMS)是一种成熟且有效的抑郁症治疗方法,但应答率并不理想。通过神经影像学对 TMS 进行个性化治疗可以考虑到个体在解剖和电生理特征方面的差异,从而提供一种更有效的治疗形式。本系统评价旨在批判性地评估与神经影像学个性化 TMS 治疗抑郁症相关的文献。
使用 PubMed、PsycINFO 和 Embase 数据库,检索截至 2020 年 11 月的相关文献。
共纳入 37 项研究。在这些研究中,共有 1451 名抑郁症患者接受了使用神经影像学进行个性化的 TMS 治疗。大多数研究使用结构或功能神经影像学来个性化治疗靶点( = 30),主要通过神经导航方法。较少的研究使用脑电图来个性化治疗频率或刺激时间( = 7)。只有 6 项研究直接比较了神经影像学个性化 TMS 与标准 TMS。
本综述的结果表明,与标准 TMS 相比,通过神经影像学对 TMS 进行个性化治疗可能更有效。需要进一步的研究来直接比较神经影像学个性化 TMS 与标准 TMS,并确定治疗个性化的最佳参数。