Institute of Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Addiction Institute of Mount Sinai, Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2021 May 4;47(3):280-304. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2021.1887202. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
: There is a knowledge gap in systematic reviews on the impact of opioid agonist treatments on mental health.: We compared mental health outcomes between different opioid agonist treatments and placebo/waitlist, and between the different opioids themselves.: This meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was pre-registered at PROSPERO (CRD42018109375). Embase, MEDLINE, PsychInfo, CINAHL Complete, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched from inception to May 2020. RCTs were included if they compared opioid agonists with each other or with placebo/waitlist in the treatment of patients with opioid use disorder and reported at least one mental health outcome after 1-month post-baseline. Studies with psychiatric care, adjunct psychotropic medications, or unbalanced psychosocial services were excluded. The primary outcome was overall mental health symptomatology, e.g. Symptom Checklist 90 total score, between opioids and placebo/waitlist. Random effects models were used for all the meta-analyses.: Nineteen studies were included in the narrative synthesis and 15 in the quantitative synthesis. Hydromorphone, diacetylmorphine (DAM), methadone, slow-release oral morphine, buprenorphine, and placebo/waitlist were among the included interventions. Based on the network meta-analysis for primary outcomes, buprenorphine (SMD (CI95%) = -0.61 (-1.20, -0.11)), DAM (-1.40 (-2.70, -0.23)), and methadone (-1.20 (-2.30, -0.11)) were superior to waitlist/placebo on overall mental health. Further direct pairwise meta-analysis indicated that overall mental health improved more in DAM compared to methadone (-0.23 (-0.34, -0.13)).: Opioid agonist treatments used for the treatment of opioid use disorder improve mental health independent of psychosocial services.
: 系统评价中存在关于阿片类激动剂治疗对心理健康影响的知识空白。: 我们比较了不同阿片类激动剂治疗与安慰剂/等待治疗、不同阿片类药物之间的心理健康结果。: 这是一项针对随机临床试验(RCT)的荟萃分析,在 PROSPERO(CRD42018109375)上预先注册。从成立到 2020 年 5 月,我们在 Embase、MEDLINE、PsychInfo、CINAHL Complete 和 Web of Science Core Collection 中进行了检索。如果 RCT 将阿片类激动剂与其他阿片类药物或安慰剂/等待治疗相比较,用于治疗阿片类药物使用障碍患者,并在基线后 1 个月报告至少一项心理健康结果,则纳入研究。排除了有精神科护理、辅助精神药物治疗或不平衡的社会心理服务的研究。主要结果是阿片类药物与安慰剂/等待治疗之间的整体心理健康症状,例如症状清单 90 总分。所有荟萃分析均采用随机效应模型。: 叙事综合纳入了 19 项研究,定量综合纳入了 15 项研究。氢吗啡酮、二乙酰吗啡(DAM)、美沙酮、缓释口服吗啡、丁丙诺啡和安慰剂/等待治疗均为干预措施。基于主要结局的网络荟萃分析,丁丙诺啡(SMD(95%CI)=-0.61(-1.20,-0.11))、DAM(-1.40(-2.70,-0.23))和美沙酮(-1.20(-2.30,-0.11))优于安慰剂/等待治疗的整体心理健康。进一步的直接成对荟萃分析表明,DAM 比美沙酮(-0.23(-0.34,-0.13))对整体心理健康的改善更大。: 用于治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的阿片类激动剂治疗可改善心理健康,与社会心理服务无关。