• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物膜模型的比较分析以确定抗菌药物的疗效。

Comparative analysis of biofilm models to determine the efficacy of antimicrobials.

作者信息

Stuermer E K, Besser M, Brill F, Geffken M, Plattfaut I, Severing A L, Wiencke V, Rembe J D, Naumova E A, Kampe A, Debus S, Smeets R

机构信息

Dept. of Vascular Medicine, University Heart Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martini Street 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Dpt. of Translational Wound Research, Centre for Biomedical Education and Research (ZBAF), Witten/Herdecke University, Stockumer Street 10, Witten, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2021 May;234:113744. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113744. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113744
PMID:33780904
Abstract

Biofilms are one of the greatest challenges in today's treatment of chronic wounds. While antimicrobials kill platonic bacteria within seconds, they are rarely able to harm biofilms. In order to identify effective substances for antibacterial therapy, cost-efficient, standardized and reproducible models that aim to mimic the clinical situation are required. In this study, two 3D biofilm models based on human plasma with immune cells (lhBIOM) or based on sheep blood (sbBIOM) containing S. aureus or P. aeruginosa, are compared with the human biofilm model hpBIOM regarding their microscopic structure (scanning electron microscopy; SEM) and their bacterial resistance to octenidine hydrochloride (OCT) and a sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) wound-irrigation solution. The three analyzed biofilm models show little to no reaction to treatment with the hypochlorous solution while planktonic S. aureus and P. aeruginosa cells are reduced within minutes. After 48 h, octenidine hydrochloride manages to erode the biofilm matrix and significantly reduce the bacterial load. The determined effects are qualitatively reflected by SEM. Our results show that both ethically acceptable human and sheep blood based biofilm models can be used as a standard for in vitro testing of new antimicrobial substances. Due to their composition, both fulfill the criteria of a reality-reflecting model and therefore should be used in the approval for new antimicrobial agents.

摘要

生物膜是当今慢性伤口治疗中最大的挑战之一。虽然抗菌剂能在几秒钟内杀死游离细菌,但它们很少能对生物膜造成损害。为了确定抗菌治疗的有效物质,需要经济高效、标准化且可重复的模型来模拟临床情况。在本研究中,将两种基于含有免疫细胞的人血浆(lhBIOM)或基于含有金黄色葡萄球菌或铜绿假单胞菌的羊血(sbBIOM)的3D生物膜模型,在微观结构(扫描电子显微镜;SEM)以及它们对盐酸奥替尼啶(OCT)和次氯酸钠(NaOCl)伤口冲洗液的细菌抗性方面,与人类生物膜模型hpBIOM进行比较。三种分析的生物膜模型对次氯酸盐溶液处理几乎没有反应,而游离的金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌细胞在几分钟内就会减少。48小时后,盐酸奥替尼啶能够侵蚀生物膜基质并显著降低细菌载量。SEM定性地反映了所确定的效果。我们的结果表明,基于人血和羊血的符合伦理规范的生物膜模型都可作为新抗菌物质体外测试的标准。由于它们的组成,两者都符合反映实际情况的模型标准,因此应用于新抗菌剂的审批。

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of biofilm models to determine the efficacy of antimicrobials.生物膜模型的比较分析以确定抗菌药物的疗效。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2021 May;234:113744. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113744. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
2
Antimicrobial Hypochlorous Wound Irrigation Solutions Demonstrate Lower Anti-biofilm Efficacy Against Bacterial Biofilm in a Complex Human Plasma Biofilm Model (hpBIOM) Than Common Wound Antimicrobials.在复杂的人血浆生物膜模型(hpBIOM)中,抗菌次氯酸伤口冲洗液对细菌生物膜的抗生物膜功效低于常见的伤口抗菌剂。
Front Microbiol. 2020 Oct 9;11:564513. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.564513. eCollection 2020.
3
Effectiveness of a polyhexamethylene biguanide-containing wound cleansing solution using experimental biofilm models.含聚六亚甲基双胍的伤口清洗溶液在实验生物膜模型中的有效性。
J Wound Care. 2023 Jun 2;32(6):359-367. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2023.32.6.359.
4
Antibiofilm Efficacy of Polihexanide, Octenidine and Sodium Hypochlorite/Hypochlorous Acid Based Wound Irrigation Solutions against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and a Multispecies Biofilm.聚己缩胍、奥替尼啶及次氯酸钠/次氯酸基伤口冲洗液对金黄色葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌及多菌种生物膜的抗生物膜疗效
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022;1369:53-67. doi: 10.1007/5584_2021_645.
5
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Increases the Sensitivity of Biofilm-Grown Staphylococcus aureus to Membrane-Targeting Antiseptics and Antibiotics.铜绿假单胞菌增加生物膜生长的金黄色葡萄球菌对膜靶向防腐剂和抗生素的敏感性。
mBio. 2019 Jul 30;10(4):e01501-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01501-19.
6
Activity of Antimicrobial Wound Dressings on Wound Biofilm.抗菌伤口敷料对伤口生物膜的作用
Front Microbiol. 2021 May 14;12:664030. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.664030. eCollection 2021.
7
Cadexomer iodine provides superior efficacy against bacterial wound biofilms in vitro and in vivo.碘卡地醇在体外和体内对细菌性伤口生物膜均具有卓越的疗效。
Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Jan;25(1):13-24. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12497. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
8
The antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of Granudacyn in vitro in a 3D collagen wound infection model.Granudacyn 体外 3D 胶原创面感染模型的抗菌和抗生物膜活性。
J Wound Care. 2022 Nov 2;31(11):908-922. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.11.908.
9
Human skin biofilm model: translational impact on swabbing and debridement.人体皮肤生物膜模型:在拭子和清创方面的转化影响。
J Wound Care. 2023 Jul 2;32(7):446-455. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2023.32.7.446.
10
Microscopic and physiologic evidence for biofilm-associated wound colonization in vivo.体内生物膜相关伤口定植的微观和生理学证据。
Wound Repair Regen. 2008 Jan-Feb;16(1):23-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00303.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Mouth Rinsing and Antiseptic Solutions on Periodontitis Bacteria in an In Vitro Oral Human Biofilm Model.漱口及抗菌溶液对体外人口腔生物膜模型中牙周炎细菌的影响
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jul 16;13(7):324. doi: 10.3390/dj13070324.
2
Antiseptic management of critical wounds: differential bacterial response upon exposure to antiseptics and first insights into antiseptic/phage interactions.关键伤口的抗菌管理:消毒剂暴露后细菌的差异反应及抗菌/噬菌体相互作用的初步见解。
Int J Surg. 2024 Sep 1;110(9):5374-5384. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001605.
3
Characterization of the Human Plasma Biofilm Model (hpBIOM) to Identify Potential Therapeutic Targets for Wound Management of Chronic Infections.
人类血浆生物膜模型(hpBIOM)的特性研究,以确定慢性感染伤口管理的潜在治疗靶点。
Microorganisms. 2024 Jan 26;12(2):269. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12020269.
4
Culture Shock: An Investigation into the Tolerance of Pathogenic Biofilms to Antiseptics in Environments Resembling the Chronic Wound Milieu.文化冲击:对类似慢性伤口环境中抗微生物生物膜对防腐剂的耐受性的调查。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Dec 8;24(24):17242. doi: 10.3390/ijms242417242.
5
Quantitative Insights and Visualization of Antimicrobial Tolerance in Mixed-Species Biofilms.混合物种生物膜中抗菌耐受性的定量洞察与可视化
Biomedicines. 2023 Sep 26;11(10):2640. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11102640.
6
Comparison of antibiofilm activity of low-concentrated hypochlorites vs polyhexanide-containing antiseptic.低浓度次氯酸盐与含聚六亚甲基胍消毒剂的抗生物膜活性比较。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Mar 15;13:1119188. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1119188. eCollection 2023.
7
Development of and Biofilm Models for the Assessment of Antibacterial Fibrous Electrospun Wound Dressings.抗菌纤维状电纺伤口敷料的评估用 和 生物膜模型的开发。
Mol Pharm. 2023 Feb 6;20(2):1230-1246. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c00902. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
8
Activity of Antimicrobial Wound Dressings on Wound Biofilm.抗菌伤口敷料对伤口生物膜的作用
Front Microbiol. 2021 May 14;12:664030. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.664030. eCollection 2021.