• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对埃塞俄比亚农村地区男性、女性和夫妻的亲密伴侣暴力预防干预措施的成本效益分析:来自“为美好生活而团结”随机对照试验的证据。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of an intimate partner violence prevention intervention targeting men, women and couples in rural Ethiopia: evidence from the Unite for a Better Life randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Poverty, Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA

Addis Ababa University School of Public Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 29;11(3):e042365. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042365.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042365
PMID:33782020
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8009224/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Experience of intimate partner violence (IPV) is associated with adverse health and psychosocial outcomes for women. However, rigorous economic evaluations of interventions targeting IPV prevention are rare. This paper analyses the cost-effectiveness of Unite for a Better Life (UBL), a gender-transformative intervention designed to prevent IPV and HIV risk behaviours among men, women and couples.

DESIGN

We use an economic evaluation nested within a large-scale cluster randomised controlled trial, analysing financial and economic costs tracked contemporaneously.

SETTING

UBL was implemented in rural southern Ethiopia between 2013 and 2015.

PARTICIPANTS

The randomised controlled trial included 6770 households in 64 villages.

INTERVENTIONS

UBL is an intervention delivered within the context of the Ethiopian coffee ceremony, a culturally established forum for community discussion, and designed to assist participants to build skills for healthy, non-violent, equitable relationships.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

This paper reports on the unit cost and cost-effectiveness of the interventions implemented. Cost-effectiveness is measured as the cost per case of past-year physical and/or sexual IPV averted.

RESULTS

The estimated annualised cost of developing and implementing UBL was 2015 US$296 772, or approximately 2015 US$74 per individual directly participating in the intervention and 2015 US$5 per person annually for each community-level beneficiary (woman of reproductive age in intervention communities). The estimated cost per case of past-year physical and/or sexual IPV averted was 2015 US$2726 for the sample of direct beneficiaries, and 2015 US$194 for the sample of all community-level beneficiaries.

CONCLUSIONS

UBL is an effective and cost-effective intervention for the prevention of IPV in a low and middle-income country setting. Further research should explore strategies to quantify the positive effects of the intervention across other domains.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02311699 (ClinicalTrials.gov); AEARCTR-0000211 (AEA Registry).

摘要

目的

亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的经历会对女性的健康和心理社会结果产生不利影响。然而,针对 IPV 预防的干预措施的严格经济评估却很少。本文分析了“联合创造更美好生活”(UBL)的成本效益,这是一种旨在预防男性、女性和夫妇之间的 IPV 和艾滋病毒风险行为的性别转换干预措施。

设计

我们使用嵌套在大规模群组随机对照试验中的经济评估,同时分析跟踪到的财务和经济成本。

设置

UBL 于 2013 年至 2015 年在埃塞俄比亚南部农村实施。

参与者

随机对照试验包括 64 个村庄的 6770 户家庭。

干预措施

UBL 是在埃塞俄比亚咖啡仪式的背景下提供的一种干预措施,咖啡仪式是一个文化上建立的社区讨论论坛,旨在帮助参与者建立健康、非暴力、平等关系的技能。

主要和次要结果测量

本文报告了实施干预措施的单位成本和成本效益。成本效益以每例过去一年身体和/或性暴力侵害事件避免的成本来衡量。

结果

UBL 的开发和实施的年化成本估计为 2015 年 296772 美元,或直接参与干预的个人约为 2015 年 74 美元,每个社区一级受益人(干预社区的育龄妇女)每年为 2015 年 5 美元。过去一年身体和/或性暴力侵害事件避免的每例成本估计为直接受益人的 2015 年 2726 美元,以及所有社区一级受益人的 2015 年 194 美元。

结论

UBL 是在中低收入国家环境中预防 IPV 的有效且具有成本效益的干预措施。进一步的研究应该探索量化干预措施在其他领域的积极影响的策略。

试验注册

NCT02311699(ClinicalTrials.gov);AEARCTR-0000211(AEA 注册表)。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of an intimate partner violence prevention intervention targeting men, women and couples in rural Ethiopia: evidence from the Unite for a Better Life randomised controlled trial.针对埃塞俄比亚农村地区男性、女性和夫妻的亲密伴侣暴力预防干预措施的成本效益分析:来自“为美好生活而团结”随机对照试验的证据。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 29;11(3):e042365. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042365.
2
Effectiveness of a culturally appropriate intervention to prevent intimate partner violence and HIV transmission among men, women, and couples in rural Ethiopia: Findings from a cluster-randomized controlled trial.文化适宜型干预在埃塞俄比亚农村地区预防男性、女性和夫妻间亲密伴侣暴力和艾滋病毒传播的效果:一项基于群组随机对照试验的研究结果。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 18;17(8):e1003274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003274. eCollection 2020 Aug.
3
Community-level spillover effects of an intervention to prevent intimate partner violence and HIV transmission in rural Ethiopia.社区层面干预措施对埃塞俄比亚农村地区预防亲密伴侣暴力和艾滋病毒传播的溢出效应。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jan;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004075.
4
An intimate partner violence prevention intervention for men, women, and couples in Ethiopia: Additional findings on substance use and depressive symptoms from a cluster-randomized controlled trial.一项针对埃塞俄比亚男性、女性和夫妻的亲密伴侣暴力预防干预措施:一项集群随机对照试验中关于物质使用和抑郁症状的附加发现。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 18;17(8):e1003131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003131. eCollection 2020 Aug.
5
Cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of a community mobilisation intervention to reduce intimate partner violence in Kampala, Uganda.乌干达坎帕拉减少亲密伴侣暴力的社区动员干预措施的成本及成本效益分析。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 29;16:196. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2883-6.
6
A cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the impact on intimate partner violence of a 10-session participatory gender training curriculum delivered to women taking part in a group-based microfinance loan scheme in Tanzania (MAISHA CRT01): study protocol.一项整群随机对照试验,旨在评估向参与坦桑尼亚基于小组的小额信贷贷款计划的妇女提供为期10节的参与式性别培训课程对亲密伴侣暴力行为的影响(MAISHA CRT01):研究方案。
BMC Womens Health. 2018 Apr 2;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0546-8.
7
Effective prevention of intimate partner violence through couples training: a randomised controlled trial of in Rwanda.通过夫妻培训有效预防亲密伴侣暴力:卢旺达的一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Dec;5(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002439.
8
Community activism as a strategy to reduce intimate partner violence (IPV) in rural Rwanda: Results of a community randomised trial.社区行动作为减少卢旺达农村亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的策略:一项社区随机试验的结果。
J Glob Health. 2020 Jun;10(1):010406. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.010406.
9
Effectiveness of a multi-level intervention to reduce men's perpetration of intimate partner violence: a cluster randomised controlled trial.多层面干预降低男性亲密伴侣暴力行为的效果:一项群组随机对照试验。
Trials. 2020 Apr 25;21(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4185-7.
10
Problem solving therapy (PST) tailored for intimate partner violence (IPV) versus standard PST and enhanced usual care for pregnant women experiencing IPV in rural Ethiopia: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial.针对埃塞俄比亚农村地区遭受亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的孕妇,量身定制的问题解决疗法(PST)与标准 PST 和强化常规护理的比较:一项随机对照可行性试验方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 1;21(1):454. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04331-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic evaluations of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): a systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)性与生殖健康(SRH)服务的经济评估:一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 17;15(3):e092837. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092837.
2
Multi-level analysis of intimate partner violence and its determinants among reproductive age group women in Ethiopia: evidence from Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey, 2016.多水平分析埃塞俄比亚育龄期妇女的亲密伴侣暴力及其决定因素:来自 2016 年埃塞俄比亚人口健康调查的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 23;24(1):1391. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18781-7.
3
Cost Analysis of Community-Based Violence Prevention Programs: Manhood 2.0 and Job Skills Programs.基于社区的暴力预防项目的成本分析:“男子气概2.0”与职业技能项目
J Fam Violence. 2022 Dec 15;39:449-456. doi: 10.1007/s10896-022-00481-8.
4
What Interventions are Cost Effective in Reducing Violence Against Women? A Scoping Review.哪些干预措施能有效减少针对妇女的暴力行为? 范围综述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 May;22(3):283-296. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00870-0. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
5
Economic evaluation of self-help group interventions for health in LMICs: a scoping review.低收入和中等收入国家自助团体健康干预措施的经济评估:一项范围综述
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Oct 11;38(9):1033-1049. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad060.
6
Strengthening women's empowerment and gender equality in fragile contexts towards peaceful and inclusive societies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.在脆弱环境中加强妇女赋权与性别平等以促进和平与包容社会:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 8;18(1):e1214. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1214. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
Displacement, Polygyny, Romantic Jealousy, and Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study among Somali Refugees in Ethiopia.流离失所、一夫多妻制、浪漫嫉妒和亲密伴侣暴力:埃塞俄比亚索马里难民中的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 9;19(9):5757. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095757.
8
Prevention of violence against women and girls: A cost-effectiveness study across 6 low- and middle-income countries.预防针对妇女和女童的暴力行为:6 个中低收入国家的成本效益研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 Mar 24;19(3):e1003827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003827. eCollection 2022 Mar.
9
Intertwined epidemics: progress, gaps, and opportunities to address intimate partner violence and HIV among key populations of women.交织的疫情:在妇女重点人群中解决亲密伴侣暴力和艾滋病毒问题的进展、差距和机会。
Lancet HIV. 2022 Mar;9(3):e202-e213. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00325-8. Epub 2022 Feb 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Community-level spillover effects of an intervention to prevent intimate partner violence and HIV transmission in rural Ethiopia.社区层面干预措施对埃塞俄比亚农村地区预防亲密伴侣暴力和艾滋病毒传播的溢出效应。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jan;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004075.
2
An intimate partner violence prevention intervention for men, women, and couples in Ethiopia: Additional findings on substance use and depressive symptoms from a cluster-randomized controlled trial.一项针对埃塞俄比亚男性、女性和夫妻的亲密伴侣暴力预防干预措施:一项集群随机对照试验中关于物质使用和抑郁症状的附加发现。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 18;17(8):e1003131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003131. eCollection 2020 Aug.
3
Effectiveness of a culturally appropriate intervention to prevent intimate partner violence and HIV transmission among men, women, and couples in rural Ethiopia: Findings from a cluster-randomized controlled trial.文化适宜型干预在埃塞俄比亚农村地区预防男性、女性和夫妻间亲密伴侣暴力和艾滋病毒传播的效果:一项基于群组随机对照试验的研究结果。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 18;17(8):e1003274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003274. eCollection 2020 Aug.
4
What will it cost to prevent violence against women and girls in low- and middle-income countries? Evidence from Ghana, Kenya, Pakistan, Rwanda, South Africa and Zambia.在低收入和中等收入国家预防针对妇女和女童的暴力行为需要多少成本?来自加纳、肯尼亚、巴基斯坦、卢旺达、南非和赞比亚的证据。
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Aug 1;35(7):855-866. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa024.
5
Gender-transformative Bandebereho couples' intervention to promote male engagement in reproductive and maternal health and violence prevention in Rwanda: Findings from a randomized controlled trial.班顿多贝雷霍性别转换伴侣干预措施促进卢旺达男性参与生殖和孕产妇健康及暴力预防:一项随机对照试验的结果。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 4;13(4):e0192756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192756. eCollection 2018.
6
Cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of a community mobilisation intervention to reduce intimate partner violence in Kampala, Uganda.乌干达坎帕拉减少亲密伴侣暴力的社区动员干预措施的成本及成本效益分析。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 29;16:196. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2883-6.
7
Effectiveness of an integrated intimate partner violence and HIV prevention intervention in Rakai, Uganda: analysis of an intervention in an existing cluster randomised cohort.乌干达拉凯实施的综合性亲密伴侣暴力和艾滋病毒预防干预措施的效果:对现有整群随机对照队列中干预措施的分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Jan;3(1):e23-33. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70344-4. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
8
Prevention of violence against women and girls: what does the evidence say?预防暴力侵害妇女和女孩行为:现有证据说明了什么?
Lancet. 2015 Apr 18;385(9977):1555-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61703-7. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
9
The cost and cost-effectiveness of gender-responsive interventions for HIV: a systematic review.针对艾滋病毒的性别平等干预措施的成本及成本效益:一项系统综述
J Int AIDS Soc. 2014 Nov 4;17(1):19228. doi: 10.7448/IAS.17.1.19228. eCollection 2014.
10
Findings from the SASA! Study: a cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of a community mobilization intervention to prevent violence against women and reduce HIV risk in Kampala, Uganda.“萨萨!”研究的结果:一项整群随机对照试验,旨在评估在乌干达坎帕拉开展的一项社区动员干预措施对预防针对妇女的暴力行为及降低感染艾滋病毒风险的影响。
BMC Med. 2014 Jul 31;12:122. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0122-5.