Suppr超能文献

通过夫妻培训有效预防亲密伴侣暴力:卢旺达的一项随机对照试验。

Effective prevention of intimate partner violence through couples training: a randomised controlled trial of in Rwanda.

机构信息

Gender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, Western Cape, South Africa

Gender Violence and Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Locon, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Dec;5(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002439.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Between 2015 and 2018, three civil society organisations in Rwanda implemented , a four-part intervention designed to reduce intimate partner violence (IPV) among couples and within communities. We assessed the impact of the programme's gender transformative curriculum for couples.

METHODS

Sectors (n=28) were purposively selected based on density of village savings and loan association (VLSA) groups and randomised (with stratification by district) to either the full community-level programme (n=14) or VSLA-only control (n=14). Within each sector, 60 couples recruited from VSLAs received either a 21-session curriculum or VSLA as usual. No blinding was attempted. Primary outcomes were perpetration (for men) or experience (for women) of past-year physical/sexual IPV at 24 months post-baseline, hypothesised to be reduced in intervention versus control (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03477877).

RESULTS

We enrolled 828 women and 821 men in the intervention sectors and 832 women and 830 men in the control sectors; at endline, 815 women (98.4%) and 763 men (92.9%) in the intervention and 802 women (96.4%) and 773 men (93.1%) were available for intention-to-treat analysis. Women in the intervention compared with control were less likely to report physical and/or sexual IPV at 24 months (adjusted relative risk (aRR)=0.44, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.59). Men in the intervention compared with control were also significantly less likely to report perpetration of physical and/or sexual IPV at 24 months (aRR=0.54, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.75). Additional intervention benefits included reductions in acceptability of wife beating, conflict with partner, depression, and corporal punishment against children and improved conflict management, communication, trust, self-efficacy, self-rated health, household earnings, food security and actions to prevent IPV. There were no study-related harms.

CONCLUSIONS

The couples' training curriculum was highly effective in reducing IPV among male/female couples in rural Rwanda. Scale-up and adaptation to similar settings should be considered.

摘要

背景

2015 年至 2018 年期间,卢旺达的三个民间社会组织实施了一项四部分干预措施,旨在减少夫妻之间和社区内的亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)。我们评估了该方案的性别转换课程对夫妻的影响。

方法

根据村庄储蓄和贷款协会(VLSA)小组的密度,有目的地选择部门(n=28),并按区分层随机(n=14)分配到完整的社区一级方案(n=14)或仅 VLSA 对照(n=14)。在每个部门中,从 VLSA 招募的 60 对夫妻接受了 21 次课程或常规的 VLSA。未尝试进行盲法。主要结局是在基线后 24 个月时,过去一年中男性对女性的身体/性 IPV 的实施(对男性而言)或女性对男性的经历(对女性而言),假设干预组比对照组减少(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03477877)。

结果

我们在干预部门招募了 828 名女性和 821 名男性,在对照组招募了 832 名女性和 830 名男性;在终点,815 名女性(98.4%)和 763 名男性(92.9%)在干预组和 802 名女性(96.4%)和 773 名男性(93.1%)可用于意向治疗分析。与对照组相比,干预组的女性在 24 个月时更不可能报告身体和/或性 IPV(调整后的相对风险(aRR)=0.44,95%CI 0.34 至 0.59)。与对照组相比,干预组的男性在 24 个月时也不太可能报告身体和/或性 IPV 的实施(aRR=0.54,95%CI 0.38 至 0.75)。干预的其他益处包括减少对打妻子的接受度、与伴侣的冲突、抑郁、对儿童的体罚以及改善冲突管理、沟通、信任、自我效能感、自我评定健康、家庭收入、粮食安全和预防 IPV 的行动。没有与研究相关的伤害。

结论

夫妻培训课程在减少卢旺达农村地区男女夫妻之间的 IPV 方面非常有效。应考虑扩大规模并适应类似环境。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10b3/7757483/9c761c2b24f4/bmjgh-2020-002439f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验