Nelson Daniel, Busch Michelle H, Kopp Darin A, Allen Daniel C
Geographical Ecology Group, Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
J Anim Ecol. 2021 Sep;90(9):2053-2064. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13490. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
While climate change is altering ecosystems on a global scale, not all ecosystems are responding in the same way. The resilience of ecological communities may depend on whether food webs are producer- or detritus-based (i.e. 'green' or 'brown' food webs, respectively), or both (i.e. 'multi-channel' food web). Food web theory suggests that the presence of multiple energy pathways can enhance community stability and resilience and may modulate the responses of ecological communities to disturbances such as climate change. Despite important advances in food web theory, few studies have empirically investigated the resilience of ecological communities to climate change stressors in ecosystems with different primary energy channels. We conducted a factorial experiment using outdoor stream mesocosms to investigate the independent and interactive effects of warming and drought on invertebrate communities in food webs with different energy channel configurations. Warming had little effect on invertebrates, but stream drying negatively impacted total invertebrate abundance, biomass, richness and diversity. Although resistance to drying did not differ among energy channel treatments, recovery and overall resilience were higher in green mesocosms than in mixed and brown mesocosms. Resilience to drying also varied widely among taxa, with larger predatory taxa exhibiting lower resilience. Our results suggest that the effects of drought on stream communities may vary regionally and depend on whether food webs are fuelled by autochthonous or allochthonous basal resources. Communities inhabiting streams with large amounts of organic matter and more complex substrates that provide refugia may be more resilient to the loss of surface water than communities inhabiting streams with simpler, more homogeneous substrates.
虽然气候变化正在全球范围内改变生态系统,但并非所有生态系统都以相同方式做出响应。生态群落的恢复力可能取决于食物网是以生产者为基础还是以碎屑为基础(即分别为“绿色”或“棕色”食物网),或者两者皆有(即“多通道”食物网)。食物网理论表明,多种能量途径的存在可以增强群落稳定性和恢复力,并可能调节生态群落对诸如气候变化等干扰的响应。尽管食物网理论取得了重要进展,但很少有研究实证调查具有不同主要能量通道的生态系统中生态群落对气候变化压力源的恢复力。我们利用室外溪流中宇宙进行了一项析因实验,以研究变暖和干旱对具有不同能量通道配置的食物网中无脊椎动物群落的独立和交互作用。变暖对无脊椎动物影响不大,但溪流干涸对无脊椎动物的总丰度、生物量、丰富度和多样性产生了负面影响。尽管不同能量通道处理对干涸的抵抗力没有差异,但绿色中宇宙中的恢复和总体恢复力高于混合和棕色中宇宙。不同类群对干涸的恢复力也有很大差异,较大的捕食性类群恢复力较低。我们的结果表明,干旱对溪流群落的影响可能因地区而异,并取决于食物网是由本地还是异地基础资源提供能量。与栖息在具有更简单、更均匀基质的溪流中的群落相比,栖息在具有大量有机物和更复杂基质从而提供避难所的溪流中的群落可能对地表水流失更具恢复力。