Lacombe F, Belloc F, Bernard P, Boisseau M R
Laboratoire d'Hématologie, Hôpital Cardiologique Haut-Lévque, Pessac, France.
Cytometry. 1988 May;9(3):245-53. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990090310.
Four published methods of DNA-content histogram analysis (those of Fried, Dean and Jett, simplified Dean, and Fox) were compared using a double labeling of different cell populations. Partially synchronized and asynchronous cell populations were incubated with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) and then stained with an anti-BrdUrd monoclonal antibody and propidium iodide (PI). The fractions of cells in the G1, S, and G2 + M phases were calculated by each method and compared with those derived from G1, S, and G2 + M areas plotted on BrdUrd/DNA bivariate histograms, taken as the "true" values. This procedure enabled an optimal choice of method for a given cell population.
使用不同细胞群体的双重标记比较了四种已发表的DNA含量直方图分析方法(Fried、Dean和Jett的方法、简化的Dean方法以及Fox方法)。将部分同步化和非同步化的细胞群体与溴脱氧尿苷(BrdUrd)一起孵育,然后用抗BrdUrd单克隆抗体和碘化丙啶(PI)染色。通过每种方法计算G1、S和G2+M期细胞的比例,并与从BrdUrd/DNA双变量直方图上绘制的G1、S和G2+M区域得出的比例进行比较,后者被视为“真实”值。该程序能够为给定的细胞群体选择最佳方法。