• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中胆总管癌切除患者切缘长度对预后的影响:单中心经验。

Prognostic Impact of Resection Margin Length in Patients Undergoing Resection for Mid-Common Bile Duct Cancer: A Single-Center Experience.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, College of Medicine Inje University, Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.

Department of Urology, College of Medicine Inje University, Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Dig Surg. 2021;38(3):212-221. doi: 10.1159/000513563. Epub 2021 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1159/000513563
PMID:33784683
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to analyze survival outcomes after segmental bile duct resection (BDR) for mid-common bile duct cancer according to the length of the tumor-free BDR margins.

METHOD

A total of 133 consecutive patients underwent BDR for mid-bile duct cancers between December 2007 and June 2017. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to verify the cutoff value of the R0 resection margin. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to resection margin status (group 1; R0 resection margin ≥5 mm; group 2, R0 resection margin <5 mm; and group 3, R1 resection margin).

RESULTS

The median follow-up period of the study cohort was 24 months. A resection margin of 5 mm in length was verified to be suitable as a reliable cutoff value. The median disease-free and overall survival (OS) periods were 32 and 49 months in group 1, 13 and 20 months in group 2, and 23 and 30 months in group 3, respectively (p = 0.03 and p < 0.001). The length of the tumor-free resection margin (hazard ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.67; p = 0.022) was independent factor affecting OS.

CONCLUSIONS

BDR for mid-bile duct cancer appears to be a feasible surgical option in selected patients with careful preoperative imaging assessment and intraoperative frozen-section diagnosis. Our results suggest achieving a BDR margin ≥5 mm to improve survival outcomes.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在根据无肿瘤胆管切除边缘的长度,分析中段胆总管癌行节段性胆管切除(BDR)后的生存结果。

方法

2007 年 12 月至 2017 年 6 月,共有 133 例连续患者接受中段胆管癌 BDR。使用 Cox 比例风险模型验证 R0 切除边缘的截断值。根据切除边缘状态将患者分为 3 组(组 1;R0 切除边缘≥5mm;组 2,R0 切除边缘<5mm;组 3,R1 切除边缘)。

结果

研究队列的中位随访时间为 24 个月。验证 5mm 长度的切除边缘是可靠的截断值。组 1 的中位无病生存和总生存(OS)期分别为 32 和 49 个月,组 2 分别为 13 和 20 个月,组 3 分别为 23 和 30 个月(p=0.03 和 p<0.001)。无肿瘤切除边缘的长度(风险比,2.01;95%置信区间,1.10-3.67;p=0.022)是影响 OS 的独立因素。

结论

对于经过仔细术前影像学评估和术中冷冻切片诊断的选定患者,BDR 治疗中段胆管癌似乎是一种可行的手术选择。我们的结果表明,达到 BDR 边缘≥5mm 可改善生存结果。

相似文献

1
Prognostic Impact of Resection Margin Length in Patients Undergoing Resection for Mid-Common Bile Duct Cancer: A Single-Center Experience.中胆总管癌切除患者切缘长度对预后的影响:单中心经验。
Dig Surg. 2021;38(3):212-221. doi: 10.1159/000513563. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
2
The Impact of Intraoperative Re-Resection of a Positive Bile Duct Margin on Clinical Outcomes for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.术中再次切除阳性胆管切缘对肝门部胆管癌临床结局的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 May;25(5):1140-1149. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6382-0. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
3
Prognostic factors in patients with middle and distal bile duct cancers.中、远端胆管癌患者的预后因素。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 7;20(21):6658-65. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i21.6658.
4
Utility of the proximal margin frozen section for resection of gastric adenocarcinoma: a 7-Institution Study of the US Gastric Cancer Collaborative.近端切缘冰冻切片在胃腺癌切除术中的应用:美国胃癌协作组的7机构研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Dec;21(13):4202-10. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3834-z. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
5
Prognostic comparison of the longitudinal margin status in distal bile duct cancer: R0 on first bile duct resection versus R0 after additional resection.远端胆管癌纵向切缘状态的预后比较:首次胆管切除时达到 R0 与追加切除后达到 R0 相比。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2019 May;26(5):169-178. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.619. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
6
Survival Comparison of Different Operation Types for Middle Bile Duct Cancer: Bile Duct Resection versus Pancreaticoduodenectomy Considering Complications and Adjuvant Treatment Effects.中段胆管癌不同手术方式的生存比较:考虑并发症及辅助治疗效果的胆管切除术与胰十二指肠切除术对比
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 10;16(2):297. doi: 10.3390/cancers16020297.
7
[Significance of positive ductal margin and prognostic factors of surgical resection in middle and distal bile duct carcinoma].[中段及远端胆管癌手术切缘阳性的意义及预后因素]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 May 1;47(9):677-80.
8
Use of a standardized diagnostic approach improves the prognostic information of histopathologic factors in pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma.采用标准化诊断方法可提高胰腺和壶腹周围腺癌组织病理学因素的预后信息。
Diagn Pathol. 2014 Apr 14;9:80. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-80.
9
Clinical value of additional resection of a margin-positive distal bile duct in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.肝门周围胆管癌切缘阳性的远端胆管附加切除的临床价值。
Br J Surg. 2019 May;106(6):774-782. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11125. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
10
Value of intraoperative neck margin analysis during Whipple for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a multicenter analysis of 1399 patients.胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺腺癌时术中切缘分析的价值:1399例患者的多中心分析
Ann Surg. 2014 Sep;260(3):494-501; discussion 501-3. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000890.

引用本文的文献

1
Cholangiocarcinoma of the Middle Bile Duct: A Narrative Review.肝内胆管癌:一篇叙述性综述。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):6504-6513. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15567-4. Epub 2024 Jul 7.