Jongeneel Gabrielle, Greuter Marjolein J E, van Erning Felice N, Koopman Miriam, Vink Geraldine R, Punt Cornelis J A, Coupé Veerle M H
Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, PO Box 7057, MF F-wing, Amsterdam, 1007 MB, the Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 Mar 12;14:1756284821995715. doi: 10.1177/1756284821995715. eCollection 2021.
BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of risk-based strategies to improve the selection of surgically treated stage II colon cancer (CC) patients for adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Using the 'Personalized Adjuvant TreaTment in EaRly stage coloN cancer' (PATTERN) model, we evaluated five selection strategies: (1) no chemotherapy, (2) Dutch guideline recommendations assuming observed adherence, (3) Dutch guideline recommendations assuming perfect adherence, (4) biomarker mutation OR pT4 stage strategy in which patients with status combined with a pT4 stage or a mutation in and/or receive chemotherapy assuming perfect adherence and (5) biomarker mutation AND pT4 stage strategy in which patients with status combined with a pT4 stage tumor and a and/or mutation receive chemotherapy assuming perfect adherence. Outcomes were number of CC deaths per 1000 patients and total discounted costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per patient (pp). Analyses were conducted from a societal perspective. The robustness of model predictions was assessed in sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The reference strategy, that is, no adjuvant chemotherapy, resulted in 139 CC deaths in a cohort of 1000 patients, 8.077 QALYs pp and total costs of €22,032 pp. Strategies 2-5 were more effective (range 8.094-8.217 QALYs pp and range 118-136 CC deaths per 1000 patients) and more costly (range €22,404-€25,102 pp). Given a threshold of €50,000/QALY, the optimal use of resources would be to treat patients with either the full adherence strategy and biomarker mutation OR pT4 stage strategy. CONCLUSION: Selection of stage II CC patients for chemotherapy can be improved by either including biomarker status in the selection strategy or by improving adherence to the Dutch guideline recommendations.
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020-9-16
Eur J Health Econ. 2020-9
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022-6
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023-1-31
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021-6
Eur J Health Econ. 2020-9