• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术治疗2型糖尿病时短与长胆胰支的比较

Short versus long biliopancreatic limb in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

作者信息

Ke Zhigang, Li Fan, Gao Yu, Zhou Xunmei, Sun Fang, Wang Li, Chen Jing, Tan Xin, Zhu Zhiming, Tong Weidong

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Department of Hypertension and Endocrinology, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Center for Hypertension and Metabolic Diseases, Chongqing Institute of Hypertension, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021 Mar;16(1):129-138. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2020.99997. Epub 2020 Oct 14.

DOI:10.5114/wiitm.2020.99997
PMID:33786126
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7991953/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is still widely accepted as a valid procedure in the treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), there continues to be a significant controversy about how long the Roux and biliopancreatic limb should be bypassed for optimum results.

AIM

To assess the effect of a longer biliopancreatic limb (BPL) length on glycemic control after RYGB in T2DM patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty-four patients with uncontrolled T2DM who underwent RYGB between May 2010 and April 2017 were collected from the prospectively designed database. Forty patients (S-BPL group) received BPL lengths ≤ 50 cm, including 30 cm (n = 1), 40 cm (n = 1), and 50 cm (n = 38). Forty-four patients (L-BPL group) received 100 cm BPL. Anthropometry, serum glucose and lipid metabolic parameters were measured at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Comparing the two groups, there were no significant differences in anthropometric and biochemical measures, except the weight and body mass index, which were higher in the S-BPL group (85.91 ±20.32 vs. 76.25 ±16.99, p = 0.038; 31.87 ±6.61 vs. 28.7 ±4.29, p = 0.005) compared to the L-BPL group. The body weight, glucose and lipid metabolic parameters decreased over time and then remained essentially stable from the first year in both groups. Two years after surgery, the remission (HbA% ≤ 6%) of T2DM was 31.2% in the S-BPL group and 37.5% in the L-BPL group (p = 0.685).

CONCLUSIONS

With consistent total small bowel bypass (AL + BPL) lengths, lengthening of the BPL from 30 to 100 cm did not affect the post-RYGB glycemic control and weight loss.

摘要

引言

尽管腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)在肥胖症和2型糖尿病(T2DM)治疗中仍被广泛认为是一种有效的手术方法,但对于Roux袢和胆胰支应旷置多长时间才能达到最佳效果,仍存在重大争议。

目的

评估延长胆胰支(BPL)长度对T2DM患者RYGB术后血糖控制的影响。

材料与方法

从前瞻性设计的数据库中收集2010年5月至2017年4月期间接受RYGB手术的84例T2DM控制不佳患者。40例患者(短BPL组)接受的BPL长度≤50 cm,包括30 cm(n = 1)、40 cm(n = 1)和50 cm(n = 38)。44例患者(长BPL组)接受100 cm的BPL。在基线以及术后1、3、6、12、24和36个月测量人体测量学指标、血清葡萄糖和脂质代谢参数。

结果

两组比较,除体重和体重指数外,人体测量学和生化指标无显著差异,短BPL组的体重和体重指数高于长BPL组(85.91±20.32 vs. 76.25±16.99,p = 0.038;31.87±6.61 vs. 28.7±4.29,p = 0.005)。两组的体重、血糖和脂质代谢参数均随时间下降,然后从第一年开始基本保持稳定。术后两年,短BPL组T2DM缓解率(糖化血红蛋白≤6%)为31.2%,长BPL组为37.5%(p = 0.685)。

结论

在总小肠旷置长度(AL + BPL)一致的情况下,将BPL从30 cm延长至100 cm不影响RYGB术后的血糖控制和体重减轻。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23b3/7991953/23bae820ff9f/WIITM-16-42091-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23b3/7991953/a39b634cb246/WIITM-16-42091-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23b3/7991953/5f4f5da04add/WIITM-16-42091-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23b3/7991953/7238e7e6420c/WIITM-16-42091-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23b3/7991953/9fc2211068a0/WIITM-16-42091-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23b3/7991953/23bae820ff9f/WIITM-16-42091-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23b3/7991953/a39b634cb246/WIITM-16-42091-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23b3/7991953/5f4f5da04add/WIITM-16-42091-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23b3/7991953/7238e7e6420c/WIITM-16-42091-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23b3/7991953/9fc2211068a0/WIITM-16-42091-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23b3/7991953/23bae820ff9f/WIITM-16-42091-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Short versus long biliopancreatic limb in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术治疗2型糖尿病时短与长胆胰支的比较
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021 Mar;16(1):129-138. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2020.99997. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
2
Correlation of T2DM and Anthropometric Measures with Total Small Bowel Length and Its Effects on Diabetes Remission After Bariatric Surgery.2 型糖尿病与人体测量学指标与全小肠长度的相关性及其对减重手术后糖尿病缓解的影响。
Obes Surg. 2024 Apr;34(4):1238-1246. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07105-8. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
3
Standard Biliopancreatic Limb (50 cm) Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Long Biliopancreatic Limb (100 cm) Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Patients with Body Mass Index 40-50 kg/m: a Randomized Prospective Study.标准胆胰支(50厘米)Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与长胆胰支(100厘米)Roux-en-Y胃旁路术治疗体重指数为40 - 50kg/m²患者的随机前瞻性研究
Obes Surg. 2022 Mar;32(3):577-586. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05868-y. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
4
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with a Biliopancreatic Limb of 200 or 160 cm: 1-Year Results of the Tehran Obesity Treatment Study (TOTS).比较 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与胆胰支 200 或 160cm 单吻合胃旁路术的疗效和安全性:德黑兰肥胖治疗研究(TOTS)的 1 年结果。
Obes Surg. 2020 Sep;30(9):3528-3535. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04681-3.
5
Effect of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with Different Lengths of Biliopancreatic and Alimentary Limbs for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and a BMI < 35 kg/m: 5-Year Outcomes in Chinese Patients.不同胆胰支和消化道支长度的Roux-en-Y胃旁路术对2型糖尿病且体重指数<35kg/m²患者的影响:中国患者的5年结局
Obes Surg. 2021 Nov;31(11):4877-4884. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05658-6. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
6
Comparing a Short Biliopancreatic Limb to a Long Biliopancreatic Limb in Patients with a Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with 4 Years Follow-up.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后患者4年随访中短胆胰支与长胆胰支的比较。
Obes Surg. 2021 Nov;31(11):4846-4852. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05651-z. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
7
The role of alimentary and biliopancreatic limb length in outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.消化道和胆胰肢长度在Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术结局中的作用。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020 Jun;15(2):290-297. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2019.89774. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
8
Impact of Biliopancreatic Limb Length (70 cm vs 120 cm), with Constant 150 cm Alimentary Limb, on Long-Term Weight Loss, Remission of Comorbidities and Supplementation Needs After Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.胃旁路术后长短胰胆支(70cm 与 120cm 对比)对长期减重、并发症缓解和补充需求的影响:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Obes Surg. 2019 Aug;29(8):2367-2372. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03717-7.
9
MGB-OAGB: Effect of Biliopancreatic Limb Length on Nutritional Deficiency, Weight Loss, and Comorbidity Resolution.MGB-OAGB:胆胰旁路术胆胰支长度对营养缺乏、体重减轻和合并症缓解的影响。
Obes Surg. 2018 Nov;28(11):3439-3445. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3405-7.
10
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with a long versus a short biliopancreatic limb improves weight loss and glycemic control in obese mice.Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与长与短胆胰支改善肥胖小鼠的体重减轻和血糖控制。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022 Nov;18(11):1286-1297. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.06.286. Epub 2022 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Long Biliopancreatic Limb (BPL) RYGB Versus Short BPL RYGB Post-Suboptimal Initial Clinical Response of SG or Recurrent Weight Gain: A Randomized Controlled Study.长胆胰肢(BPL)胃旁路术与短BPL胃旁路术治疗袖状胃切除术初始临床反应欠佳或体重复发性增加:一项随机对照研究
Obes Surg. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-08033-x.
2
The Impact of Longer Biliopancreatic Limb Length on Weight Loss and Comorbidity Improvement at 5 Years After Primary Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery: A Population-Based Matched Cohort Study.原发性 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术后 5 年时更长胆胰支长度对减重和合并症改善的影响:一项基于人群的匹配队列研究。
Obes Surg. 2024 Sep;34(9):3236-3245. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07267-5. Epub 2024 Jul 9.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of alimentary and biliopancreatic limb length in outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.消化道和胆胰肢长度在Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术结局中的作用。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020 Jun;15(2):290-297. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2019.89774. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
2
9. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: .9. 心血管疾病与风险管理: 。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S86-S104. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S009.
3
Bariatric Surgery Worldwide: Baseline Demographic Description and One-Year Outcomes from the Second IFSO Global Registry Report 2013-2015.
《全球减肥手术:2013 - 2015年国际肥胖与代谢病外科联盟(IFSO)全球登记处第二次报告的基线人口统计学描述及一年期结果》
Obes Surg. 2018 Feb;28(2):313-322. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2845-9.
4
Severe fatal protein malnutrition and liver failure in a morbidly obese patient after mini-gastric bypass surgery: Case report.袖状胃切除术后病态肥胖患者发生严重致命性蛋白质营养不良和肝功能衰竭:病例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;33:71-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.02.033. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
5
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes.2. 糖尿病的分类与诊断。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jan;40(Suppl 1):S11-S24. doi: 10.2337/dc17-S005.
6
A short or a long Roux limb in gastric bypass surgery: does it matter?胃旁路手术中 Roux 袢的长短:有关系吗?
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1882-1890. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5188-z. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
7
Small Bowel Limb Lengths and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review.小肠肠袢长度与Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术:一项系统评价
Obes Surg. 2016 Mar;26(3):660-71. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2050-2.
8
How long should we make the biliopancreatic limb during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass?在Roux-en-Y胃旁路术中,我们应将胆胰支做多长?
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Nov-Dec;11(6):1246-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.04.020. Epub 2015 May 5.
9
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: limb length and weight loss.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术:肠袢长度与体重减轻
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2014;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):56-8. doi: 10.1590/s0102-6720201400s100014.
10
Gastric bypass with long alimentary limb or long pancreato-biliary limb--long-term results on weight loss, resolution of co-morbidities and metabolic parameters.采用长消化道支或长胰胆支的胃旁路手术——关于体重减轻、合并症缓解及代谢参数的长期结果
Obes Surg. 2014 Oct;24(10):1595-602. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1245-7.