Suppr超能文献

瘢痕疙瘩和增生性瘢痕治疗策略的范围综述

Scoping Review of Therapeutic Strategies for Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars.

作者信息

Anderson Jaclyn B, Foglio Aaron, Harrant Alex B, Huang Christene A, Hultman C Scott, Mathes David W, Chong Tae W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colo.

Department of Surgery, Division Transplant Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colo.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Mar 22;9(3):e3469. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003469. eCollection 2021 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Keloids are an abnormal proliferation of scars that can involve large areas of tissue beyond the original injury site. Hypertrophic scars are similar clinically, but do not exceed the original scar limits. These scarring abnormalities can cause noxious symptoms such as pain, tenderness, itching, and ulcerations. The aim of this review is to discuss current therapies for both types of abnormal scarring, and to determine if guidelines can be provided for excisional treatment with adjuvant therapies versus non-excisional methods.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed through the Web of Science database. The search revolved around keywords such as "keloid," "hypertrophic scars," and "treatment." Articles were reviewed and screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria. The review focuses on an analysis and summarization of randomized control trials regarding keloid or hypertrophic scar treatments.

RESULTS

The original searches produced 1161 and 1275 articles for keloid and hypertrophic scars, respectively. In total, 316 duplicates were found. After accounting for 2014-2019 publication time, 655 keloid and 893 hypertrophic scar articles were reviewed. This resulted in 15 articles that pertained to treatment and randomized control trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Keloids and hypertrophic scars present a clinical challenge. Based on qualitative review of recurrence, neither excision plus adjuvant therapy or nonsurgical treatments can be recommended preferentially at this time. More research is needed to determine if recurrence rate bias exists between the treatment regimens, as excisional treatment plus adjuvant therapy is reserved for refractory scars.

摘要

背景

瘢痕疙瘩是瘢痕的异常增生,可累及原始损伤部位以外的大片组织。增生性瘢痕在临床上与之相似,但不会超出原始瘢痕范围。这些瘢痕异常可引起疼痛、压痛、瘙痒和溃疡等有害症状。本综述的目的是讨论这两种异常瘢痕的当前治疗方法,并确定是否可以为辅助治疗的手术切除与非手术方法提供指导。

方法

通过科学网数据库进行系统的文献检索。检索围绕“瘢痕疙瘩”、“增生性瘢痕”和“治疗”等关键词展开。对文章进行审查并筛选纳入和排除标准。该综述重点分析和总结关于瘢痕疙瘩或增生性瘢痕治疗的随机对照试验。

结果

最初的检索分别产生了1161篇和1275篇关于瘢痕疙瘩和增生性瘢痕的文章。总共发现316篇重复文章。在考虑2014 - 2019年的发表时间后,审查了655篇瘢痕疙瘩文章和893篇增生性瘢痕文章。这产生了15篇与治疗和随机对照试验相关的文章。

结论

瘢痕疙瘩和增生性瘢痕带来了临床挑战。基于对复发情况的定性综述,目前不能优先推荐手术切除加辅助治疗或非手术治疗。由于手术切除加辅助治疗仅用于难治性瘢痕,因此需要更多研究来确定治疗方案之间是否存在复发率偏差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验