Rhee Sung-Min, Nashikkar Piyush Suresh, Park Joo Hyun, Jeon Young Dae, Oh Joo Han
Shoulder & Elbow Clinic, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Max Institute of Musculoskeletal Sciences, Max Smart Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jan 20;9(1):2325967120972052. doi: 10.1177/2325967120972052. eCollection 2021 Jan.
The correlation between isokinetic internal and external rotation (IR and ER) strength and functional outcomes in patients with anterior shoulder instability treated by arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction (ACR) has not been studied.
To analyze isokinetic IR and ER strength and their correlation with clinical outcomes in patients with anterior shoulder instability treated by ACR.
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Between January 2004 and June 2015, a total of 104 patients who underwent ACR for anterior shoulder instability were analyzed. The mean peak torque (PT) in IR (IR) and ER (ER), PT deficit (PTD; %) relative to the opposite healthy shoulder, and PT ratio (PTR; ER/IR) were calculated before and 1 year after surgery. Functional scores were evaluated before surgery and at every follow-up visit. Recurrence and postoperative apprehension during ER at 90° of arm abduction were evaluated at 1 year and the final follow-up (76.6 ± 64.4 months).
IR and ER strength were measured for 68 of 104 patients at 1 year after surgery. ER and IR were less on the involved side than on the uninvolved side before surgery (0.29 ± 0.10 vs 0.33 ± 0.10 N·m/kg, respectively, for ER [ = .002]; 0.36 ± 0.14 vs 0.41 ± 0.16 N·m/kg, respectively; for IR [ = .01]). At 1 year after surgery, IR on the involved side recovered (0.40 ± 0.20 N·m/kg), whereas ER remained weak (0.30 ± 0.13 N·m/kg) relative to the baseline value. PTD in IR (PTD) improved to 2.2% ± 24.4% ( = .012), whereas PTD in ER (PTD) showed no improvement (13.5% ± 13.8%; = .569). PTR on the involved side improved from 1.07 ± 1.71 to 0.86 ± 0.23 at 1 year ( < .001). All functional scores improved significantly at the final follow-up. At 1 year, 9 of 68 (13.2%) patients showed positive apprehension. PTD and PTD on the involved side were worse in patients with positive apprehension than in those with negative apprehension ( = .039 and .014, respectively). PTD was worse than PTD in patients with positive apprehension at 1 year ( = .022).
For those with anterior shoulder instability, preoperative IR and ER strength of the involved shoulder were lower than those of the uninvolved shoulder. IR recovered, whereas ER remained weak after ACR. To prevent positive apprehension after surgery, IR and ER strengthening exercises are important, with more emphasis on exercises for ER.
关节镜下盂唇重建术(ACR)治疗的前肩不稳患者等速内旋(IR)和外旋(ER)力量与功能预后之间的相关性尚未得到研究。
分析ACR治疗的前肩不稳患者的等速IR和ER力量及其与临床预后的相关性。
病例系列;证据等级,4级。
2004年1月至2015年6月,共分析了104例行ACR治疗前肩不稳的患者。计算术前和术后1年患侧IR(IR)和ER(ER)的平均峰值扭矩(PT)、相对于对侧健康肩部的PT差值(PTD;%)以及PT比值(PTR;ER/IR)。术前及每次随访时评估功能评分。在1年及最终随访(76.6±64.4个月)时评估外展90°时ER的复发及术后恐惧情况。
104例患者中有68例在术后1年测量了IR和ER力量。术前患侧ER和IR均低于未患侧(ER分别为0.29±0.10 vs 0.33±0.10 N·m/kg,P = 0.002;IR分别为0.36±0.14 vs 0.41±0.16 N·m/kg,P = 0.01)。术后1年,患侧IR恢复(0.40±0.20 N·m/kg),而相对于基线值ER仍较弱(0.30±0.13 N·m/kg)。IR的PTD(PTD)改善至2.2%±24.4%(P = 0.012),而ER的PTD(PTD)无改善(13.5%±13.8%;P = 0.569)。患侧PTR在1年时从1.07±1.71改善至0.86±0.23(P < 0.001)。所有功能评分在最终随访时均显著改善。1年时,68例患者中有9例(13.2%)出现阳性恐惧。患侧有阳性恐惧的患者PTD和PTD比阴性恐惧患者更差(分别为P = 0.039和0.014)。1年时阳性恐惧患者的PTD比PTD更差(P = 0.022)。
对于前肩不稳患者,患侧肩部术前IR和ER力量低于未患侧。ACR术后IR恢复,而ER仍较弱。为防止术后出现阳性恐惧,IR和ER强化锻炼很重要,并更强调ER锻炼。