• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国女性对新型生殖健康技术的认知与接受度

US Women's Perceptions and Acceptance of New Reproductive Health Technologies.

作者信息

Worthington Amber K, Burke Erin E, Shirazi Talia N, Leahy Carly

机构信息

Department of Communication, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.

Modern Fertility, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2020 Sep 24;1(1):402-412. doi: 10.1089/whr.2020.0063. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1089/whr.2020.0063
PMID:33786505
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7784726/
Abstract

Women have faced persistent problems accessing reproductive health care. New applications of health technologies to reproductive health, specifically online fertility specialist consultations and reproductive hormone self-collection tests (SCTs), present unique opportunities to overcome these issues. This article uses the technology acceptance model to examine factors that influence women's intentions to use these new reproductive health technologies. Participants ( = 327 US women) completed an online survey assessing perceptions related to both of these reproductive health technologies, including usefulness, ease of use, risk, trust, subjective norms, and personal responsibility, to learn about fertility. Participants indicated high perceptions of usefulness, ease of use, and trust, as well as low perceptions of risk and subjective norms for both online fertility consultations (OFCs) and reproductive hormone SCTs. Women indicated low perceptions of responsibility to use OFCs, but high perceptions of responsibility to use reproductive hormone SCTs. Structural equation modeling indicated that intentions to use OFCs were predicted by usefulness, subjective norms, and responsibility; intentions to use reproductive hormone SCTs were predicted by usefulness, ease of use, subjective norms, and responsibility. Fertility specialist consultations and reproductive hormone testing can provide women with essential fertility information that facilitates informed reproductive decisions; however, these services have historically been difficult to access. Widespread uptake of new reproductive health technologies could promote positive advances in women's reproductive health outcomes.

摘要

女性在获得生殖健康护理方面一直面临问题。健康技术在生殖健康方面的新应用,特别是在线生育专家咨询和生殖激素自我采集检测(SCT),为克服这些问题提供了独特的机会。本文使用技术接受模型来研究影响女性使用这些新生殖健康技术意愿的因素。参与者(n = 327名美国女性)完成了一项在线调查,评估与这两种生殖健康技术相关的认知,包括有用性、易用性、风险、信任、主观规范和个人责任,以了解生育情况。参与者对在线生育咨询(OFC)和生殖激素SCT的有用性、易用性和信任度评价较高,对风险和主观规范的评价较低。女性对使用OFC的责任感评价较低,但对使用生殖激素SCT的责任感评价较高。结构方程模型表明,使用OFC的意愿由有用性、主观规范和责任感预测;使用生殖激素SCT的意愿由有用性、易用性、主观规范和责任感预测。生育专家咨询和生殖激素检测可以为女性提供重要的生育信息,有助于她们做出明智的生殖决策;然而,这些服务历来难以获得。新生殖健康技术的广泛应用可能会推动女性生殖健康结果的积极进展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19f5/7784726/9204201a99ae/whr.2020.0063_figure3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19f5/7784726/3cd22ac37c7b/whr.2020.0063_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19f5/7784726/175e50022f69/whr.2020.0063_figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19f5/7784726/9204201a99ae/whr.2020.0063_figure3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19f5/7784726/3cd22ac37c7b/whr.2020.0063_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19f5/7784726/175e50022f69/whr.2020.0063_figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19f5/7784726/9204201a99ae/whr.2020.0063_figure3.jpg

相似文献

1
US Women's Perceptions and Acceptance of New Reproductive Health Technologies.美国女性对新型生殖健康技术的认知与接受度
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2020 Sep 24;1(1):402-412. doi: 10.1089/whr.2020.0063. eCollection 2020.
2
How Media Use Influences the Fertility Intentions Among Chinese Women of Reproductive Age: A Perspective of Social Trust.媒体使用如何影响中国育龄妇女的生育意愿:社会信任视角。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 10;10:882009. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.882009. eCollection 2022.
3
"There Are Things We Can Do and There Are Things We Cannot Do." A Qualitative Study About Women's Perceptions on Empowerment in Relation to Fertility Intentions and Family Planning Practices in Mozambique.“有些事我们能做,有些事我们做不了。” 一项关于莫桑比克女性对与生育意愿和计划生育实践相关的赋权认知的定性研究。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Mar 23;3:824650. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.824650. eCollection 2022.
4
Gender-planned health services.性别规划的健康服务。
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1992 Aug;86 Suppl 1:19-23. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1992.11812731.
5
Barriers to male involvement in contraceptive uptake and reproductive health services: a qualitative study of men and women's perceptions in two rural districts in Uganda.男性参与避孕措施和生殖健康服务的障碍:乌干达两个农村地区男性和女性认知的定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2014 Mar 5;11(1):21. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-21.
6
Women's career priority is associated with attitudes towards family planning and ethical acceptance of reproductive technologies.女性的职业优先事项与她们对计划生育的态度和对生殖技术的伦理接受程度有关。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Oct 1;32(10):2069-2075. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex275.
7
An interactive website for informed contraception choice: randomised evaluation of .一个用于明智避孕选择的交互式网站:……的随机评估
Digit Health. 2020 Jun 26;6:2055207620936435. doi: 10.1177/2055207620936435. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
8
The power of women's and men's Social Networks to catalyse normative and behavioural change: evaluation of an intervention addressing Unmet need for Family Planning in Benin.女性和男性社会网络促进规范和行为改变的力量:评估一项针对贝宁计划生育未满足需求的干预措施。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 7;22(1):672. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12681-4.
9
Women's costs for accessing comprehensive sexual and reproductive health services: findings from an observational study in Johannesburg, South Africa.女性获取全面性与生殖健康服务的成本:来自南非约翰内斯堡的一项观察性研究结果。
Reprod Health. 2019 Dec 16;16(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0842-2.
10
Patriarchal norms, partner pronatalism, and women's fertility intentions in Ghana.父权规范、伴侣的生育意愿与加纳女性的生育意愿。
Afr J Reprod Health. 2023 Feb;27(2):76-86. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2023/v27i2.8.

引用本文的文献

1
Participant Evaluation of Blockchain-Enhanced Women's Health Research Apps: Mixed Methods Experimental Study.区块链增强型女性健康研究应用程序的参与者评估:混合方法实验研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Mar 25;13:e65747. doi: 10.2196/65747.
2
A systematic review of consumers' and healthcare professionals' trust in digital healthcare.对消费者和医疗保健专业人员对数字医疗保健信任度的系统评价。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Feb 21;8(1):115. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01510-8.
3
Concordance of hemoglobin A1c and reproductive hormone levels in menstrual and venous blood.

本文引用的文献

1
Centring sexual and reproductive health and justice in the global COVID-19 response.将性与生殖健康及正义置于全球新冠疫情应对工作的核心位置。
Lancet. 2020 Apr 11;395(10231):1175-1177. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30801-1.
2
Incorporating telemedicine as part of COVID-19 outbreak response systems.将远程医疗纳入 COVID-19 疫情应对系统。
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Apr;26(4):147-148. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42784.
3
Quantifying fertility? Direct-to-consumer ovarian reserve testing and the new (in)fertility pipeline.量化生育能力?直接面向消费者的卵巢储备测试与新的(不孕)生育通道。
糖化血红蛋白与月经血和静脉血中生殖激素水平的一致性。
F S Rep. 2023 Nov 28;5(1):33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2023.11.009. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Survey Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Menstrual Cycle Tracking Technologies.定量和定性月经周期追踪技术的调查分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Aug 22;59(9):1509. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091509.
5
A Comparison of Two Hormonal Fertility Monitoring Systems for Ovulation Detection: A Pilot Study.两种用于排卵检测的激素生育监测系统的比较:一项初步研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Feb 18;59(2):400. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020400.
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan;245:112697. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112697. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
4
Medication Abortion Provided Through Telemedicine in Four U.S. States.美国四个州通过远程医疗提供药物流产。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;134(2):343-350. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003357.
5
Disparities in accessing infertility care in the United States: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2013-16.美国获取不孕不育护理的差异:来自 2013-2016 年国家健康和营养调查的结果。
Fertil Steril. 2019 Sep;112(3):562-568. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.04.044. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
6
Concordance of Fingerstick and Venipuncture Sampling for Fertility Hormones.指血和静脉采血样检测生育激素的一致性。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):343-348. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003066.
7
Trends in Fertility and Mother's Age at First Birth Among Rural and Metropolitan Counties: United States, 2007-2017.2007 - 2017年美国农村和大都市县的生育率及首次生育时母亲年龄的趋势
NCHS Data Brief. 2018 Oct(323):1-8.
8
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2015.辅助生殖技术监测报告——美国,2015 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018 Feb 16;67(3):1-28. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6703a1.
9
What women want? A scoping survey on women's knowledge, attitudes and behaviours towards ovarian reserve testing and egg freezing.女性想要什么?一项关于女性对卵巢储备功能检测和卵子冷冻的知识、态度及行为的范围界定调查。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Oct;217:71-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.08.024. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
10
Fertility preservation training for obstetrics and gynecology fellows: a highly desired but non-standardized experience.妇产科住院医师的生育力保存培训:一项备受期待但未标准化的经历。
Fertil Res Pract. 2017 Jul 4;3:9. doi: 10.1186/s40738-017-0036-y. eCollection 2017.