• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在国家乳腺数据库中,60 岁以上女性 BI-RADS 3 级可能为良性的发现中,癌症发生率超过 2%。

Cancer Yield Exceeds 2% for BI-RADS 3 Probably Benign Findings in Women Older Than 60 Years in the National Mammography Database.

机构信息

From the Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, 765 Stewart Ave, Garden City, NY 11530 (C.S.L.); Departments of Computational and Systems Biology (J.M.B.) and Radiology (W.A.B.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa; and Magee-Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (W.A.B.).

出版信息

Radiology. 2021 Jun;299(3):550-558. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204031. Epub 2021 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1148/radiol.2021204031
PMID:33787333
Abstract

Background Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3 (BR3) (probably benign) mammographic assessments are reserved for imaging findings known to have likelihood of malignancy of 2% or less. Purpose To determine the effect of age, finding type, and prior mammography on cancer yield for BR3 findings in the National Mammography Database (NMD). Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant retrospective cohort institutional review board-exempt study evaluated women recalled from screening mammography followed by BR3 assessment at diagnostic evaluation from January 2009 to March 2018 and from 471 NMD facilities. Only the first BR3 occurrence was included for women with biopsy or imaging follow-up of at least 2 years. Women with a history of breast cancer or who underwent biopsy at time of initial BR3 assessment were excluded. Women were stratified by age in 10-year intervals. Cancer yield was calculated for each age group, with (for presumed new findings) and without prior mammographic comparison, and by lesion type, where available. Linear regression with weighted-age binning was performed to assess for differences between groups; < .05 was indicative of a significant difference. Results A total of 1 380 652 (18.2%) women were recalled after screening mammography, of whom 157 130 (11.4%) were given a BR3 assessment within 90 days after screening. Of these, 43 628 women (median age, 55 years; age range, 25-90 years) had adequate follow-up for analysis. Cancer yield increased with increasing age decile, ranging from 0.51% (six of 1167) in women aged 30-39 years to 4.63% (41 of 885) in women aged 80-90 years; cancer yield exceeded 2% at and after age 59.7 years for baseline findings and at and after age 53.6 years for presumed new findings, although there was no effect on stage distribution. Cancer yield for baseline BR3 masses was 10 of 2111 (0.47% [95% CI: 0.24, 0.90]) versus 47 of 3003 (1.57% [95% CI: 1.16, 2.09]) with prior comparisons ( < .001); cancer yield for baseline calcifications was eight of 929 (0.86% [95% CI: 0.40, 1.76]) versus 84 of 2999 (2.80% [95% CI: 2.23, 3.47]) with prior comparisons ( < .001). Difference in cancer yield was 0.51% (95% CI: 0.16, 0.86) between women with and women without prior comparison at the same age ( = .006). Conclusion Cancer yield exceeded the 2% threshold for women aged 60 years or older and reached 4.6% for women aged 80-89 years. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 findings in women with a prior comparison had higher cancer yield than in those without a prior comparison at the same age. © RSNA, 2021

摘要

背景 乳腺成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)类别 3(BR3)(可能良性)乳腺评估保留用于已知恶性可能性为 2%或更低的影像学发现。目的 确定年龄、发现类型和先前的乳房 X 线摄影对国家乳房 X 线摄影数据库(NMD)中 BR3 发现的癌症检出率的影响。

材料和方法 这项符合 HIPAA 规定的回顾性队列机构审查委员会豁免研究评估了 2009 年 1 月至 2018 年 3 月期间从筛查性乳房 X 线摄影中召回并在诊断评估中进行 BR3 评估的女性,以及来自 471 个 NMD 设施的女性。对于至少有 2 年活检或影像学随访的女性,仅包括第一次 BR3 发生情况。排除有乳腺癌病史或在首次 BR3 评估时接受过活检的女性。按 10 年间隔的年龄分层。计算每个年龄组的癌症检出率,包括(对于假定的新发现)和不包括先前的乳房 X 线摄影比较,并在有条件的情况下按病变类型进行比较。使用加权年龄分组进行线性回归,以评估组间差异; <.05 表示差异有统计学意义。

结果 在筛查性乳房 X 线摄影后,共有 1380652 名(18.2%)女性被召回,其中 157130 名(11.4%)在筛查后 90 天内接受了 BR3 评估。其中,43628 名(中位年龄为 55 岁;年龄范围为 25-90 岁)有足够的随访进行分析。癌症检出率随年龄十位数的增加而增加,从 30-39 岁女性的 0.51%(1167 例中 6 例)到 80-89 岁女性的 4.63%(885 例中 41 例);基线发现时,年龄超过 59.7 岁,假定新发现时,年龄超过 53.6 岁,癌症检出率超过 2%。基线 BR3 肿块的癌症检出率为 2111 例中有 10 例(0.47%[95%CI:0.24,0.90]),而与之前比较时为 3003 例中有 47 例(1.57%[95%CI:1.16,2.09])( <.001);基线钙化的癌症检出率为 929 例中有 8 例(0.86%[95%CI:0.40,1.76]),而与之前比较时为 2999 例中有 84 例(2.80%[95%CI:2.23,3.47])( <.001)。同一年龄有和没有先前比较的女性之间的癌症检出率差异为 0.51%(95%CI:0.16,0.86)( =.006)。

结论 年龄在 60 岁或以上的女性癌症检出率超过 2%,年龄在 80-89 岁的女性癌症检出率达到 4.6%。与没有先前比较的女性相比,有先前比较的女性的 BR3 发现的癌症检出率更高。

相似文献

1
Cancer Yield Exceeds 2% for BI-RADS 3 Probably Benign Findings in Women Older Than 60 Years in the National Mammography Database.在国家乳腺数据库中,60 岁以上女性 BI-RADS 3 级可能为良性的发现中,癌症发生率超过 2%。
Radiology. 2021 Jun;299(3):550-558. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204031. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
2
Cancer Yield and Patterns of Follow-up for BI-RADS Category 3 after Screening Mammography Recall in the National Mammography Database.在国家乳腺数据库中,乳腺 X 线摄影筛查召回后 BI-RADS 3 类的癌症发生率和随访模式。
Radiology. 2020 Jul;296(1):32-41. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192641. Epub 2020 May 19.
3
Utilization and Cancer Yield of Probably Benign Assessment Category in the National Mammography Database: 2009 to 2018.在国家乳腺数据库中可能良性评估类别的使用情况和癌症检出率:2009 年至 2018 年。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2022 May;19(5):604-614. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.01.021. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
4
BI-RADS Category 3 Comparison: Probably Benign Category after Recall from Screening before and after Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.BI-RADS 3类比较:数字乳腺断层合成技术实施前后筛查召回后可能为良性类别。
Radiology. 2017 Dec;285(3):778-787. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162837. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
5
Characteristics, Malignancy Rate, and Follow-up of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Identified at Breast MR Imaging: Implications for MR Image Interpretation and Management.乳腺磁共振成像中 BI-RADS 3 类病变的特征、恶性率及随访:对磁共振图像解读和管理的影响。
Radiology. 2016 Sep;280(3):707-15. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016151548. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
6
Probably benign lesions at screening breast US in a population with elevated risk: prevalence and rate of malignancy in the ACRIN 6666 trial.在高危人群的乳腺超声筛查中,可能为良性病变:ACRIN 6666 试验中的恶性肿瘤患病率和发生率。
Radiology. 2013 Dec;269(3):701-12. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122829. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
7
Why Start Now? Retrospective Study Evaluating Baseline Screening Mammography in Patients Age 60 and Older.为何现在开始?评估 60 岁及以上患者基线筛查乳房 X 光检查的回顾性研究。
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2024 Jan-Feb;53(1):62-67. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2023.08.012. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
8
Use of BI-RADS 3-probably benign category in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial.美国放射学院影像学网络数字乳腺成像筛查试验中 BI-RADS 3-可能良性类别(的使用)。
Radiology. 2011 Jul;260(1):61-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11101285. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
9
Patient compliance and diagnostic yield of 18-month unilateral follow-up in surveillance of probably benign mammographic lesions.可能良性乳腺病变监测中 18 个月单侧随访的患者依从性和诊断率。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Apr;202(4):922-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11137.
10
The Impact of Mammographic, Radiologist, and Patient Factors on the Likelihood of Probably Benign (BI-RADS 3) Assessment at Diagnostic Mammography.乳腺 X 线摄影、放射科医生和患者因素对诊断性乳腺 X 线摄影中可能良性(BI-RADS 3)评估可能性的影响。
J Breast Imaging. 2024 May 27;6(3):246-253. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbae014.

引用本文的文献

1
Integration of AI lesion classification, age, and BI-RADS assessment to reduce benign biopsies on breast ultrasound.整合人工智能病变分类、年龄和乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)评估,以减少乳腺超声检查中的良性活检。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Mar 22. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11467-7.
2
Developing a nomogram prediction model to enhance diagnostic accuracy of supplemental ultrasound post-negative mammography.开发一种列线图预测模型以提高乳腺钼靶检查阴性后补充超声检查的诊断准确性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 27;103(52):e41149. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041149.
3
A risk prediction stratification for non-mass breast lesions, combining clinical characteristics and imaging features on ultrasound, mammography, and MRI.
一种针对非肿块性乳腺病变的风险预测分层方法,结合了超声、乳腺X线摄影和MRI的临床特征及影像特征。
Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 17;14:1337265. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1337265. eCollection 2024.
4
Transfer learning classification of suspicious lesions on breast ultrasound: is there room to avoid biopsies of benign lesions?乳腺超声中可疑病灶的迁移学习分类:是否有机会避免对良性病灶进行活检?
Eur Radiol Exp. 2024 Oct 28;8(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s41747-024-00480-y.
5
Value of BI-RADS 3 Audits.乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)3类评估的价值
Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2022 Feb;41(5):33086-33092. doi: 10.26717/BJSTR.2022.41.006668. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
6
Downgrade BI-RADS 4A Patients Using Nomogram Based on Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ultrasound, and Mammography.基于乳腺磁共振成像、超声和乳腺X线摄影的列线图对BI-RADS 4A级患者进行降级评估。
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 27;12:807402. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.807402. eCollection 2022.
7
BI-RADS 3 on Screening Breast Ultrasound: What Is It and What Is the Appropriate Management?乳腺超声筛查中BI-RADS 3类:是什么以及如何进行恰当管理?
J Breast Imaging. 2021 Aug 15;3(5):527-538. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbab060. eCollection 2021 Sep-Oct.