From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Biomedical Ethics Research, and Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, and the Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
South Med J. 2021 Apr;114(4):218-222. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001237.
Physician trainees in obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) experience unexpected outcomes similar to those of supervising physicians. A relative lack of experience and perspective may make them more vulnerable to second victim experience (SVE), however. The objectives of our study were to contrast the prevalence of SVE between supervising physicians and trainees and to identify their preferred methods of support.
In 2019, the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool, a validated survey with supplemental questions, was administered to healthcare workers caring for OBGYN patients at a large academic center in the midwestern United States.
The survey was sent to 571 healthcare workers working in OBGYN. A total of 205 healthcare workers completed the survey, including 18 (43.9% of 41) supervising physicians and 12 (48.0% of 25) resident/fellow physicians. The mean scores for the Second Victim Experience and Support Tool dimensions and outcomes were similar between the two groups. Seven (58.3%) trainees reported feeling like a second victim after an adverse patient safety event at some point in their work experience compared with 10 (55.6%) of the supervising physicians. Five (41.7%) trainees identified as a second victim in the previous 12 months compared with 3 (16.7%) supervising physicians ( = 0.21). The most common form of desired support for both groups was conversations with their peers.
Trainees and supervising physicians are both at risk of SVE after an unexpected medical event and prefer conversations with peers as a desired form of support. Because trainees commonly encounter SVEs early in their careers, program directors should consider implementing a program for peer support after an unexpected event.
妇产科医师受训者(OBGYN)经历的意外结果与上级医师相似。然而,相对缺乏经验和视角可能使他们更容易受到二次伤害经历(SVE)的影响。我们研究的目的是比较上级医师和受训者 SVE 的发生率,并确定他们首选的支持方法。
2019 年,使用经过验证的调查工具“第二受害者体验和支持工具”(Second Victim Experience and Support Tool)对美国中西部一家大型学术中心照顾妇产科患者的医护人员进行了调查。该工具附有补充问题。
该调查发给了在美国中西部一家大型学术中心工作的 571 名妇产科医护人员。共有 205 名医护人员完成了调查,包括 18 名(43.9%的 41 名)上级医师和 12 名(48.0%的 25 名)住院医师/研究员。两组之间第二受害者体验和支持工具维度和结果的平均得分相似。7 名(58.3%)受训者在工作经历中的某个时候报告在发生不良患者安全事件后感到自己是第二受害者,而 10 名(55.6%)上级医师报告了这种情况( = 0.21)。5 名(41.7%)受训者在过去 12 个月中被认定为第二受害者,而 3 名(16.7%)上级医师被认定为第二受害者( = 0.21)。两组最常见的支持形式都是与同事交谈。
上级医师和受训者在意外医疗事件后都有发生 SVE 的风险,他们都希望通过与同事交谈获得支持。由于受训者在职业生涯早期经常遇到 SVE,项目负责人应考虑在意外事件发生后为其实施同伴支持计划。