Suppr超能文献

CMR 评估心肌变形:与超声斑点追踪的比较。

Assessment of myocardial deformation with CMR: a comparison with ultrasound speckle tracking.

机构信息

Radiology Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.

Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2021 Oct;31(10):7242-7250. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07857-2. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Myocardial deformation integrated with cardiac dimensions provides a comprehensive assessment of cardiac function, which has proven useful to differentiate cardiac pathology from physiological adaptation to situations such as chronic intensive training. Feature tracking (FT) can measure myocardial deformation from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) cine sequences; however, its accuracy is not yet fully validated. Our aim was to compare the accuracy and reproducibility of FT with speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) in highly trained endurance athletes.

METHODS

Ninety-three endurance athletes (> 12-h training/week during the last 5 years, 52% male, 35 ± 5.1 years old) and 72 age-matched controls underwent resting CMR and transthoracic echocardiography to assess biventricular exercise-induced remodeling and biventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) by CMR-FT and STE.

RESULTS

Strain values were significantly lower when assessed by CMR-FT compared to STE (p < 0.001), with good reproducibility for the left ventricle (bias = 3.94%, limit of agreement [LOA] = ± 4.27 %) but wider variability for right ventricle strain. Strain values by both techniques proportionally decreased with increasing ventricular volumes, potentially depicting the functional biventricular reserve that characterizes athletes' hearts.

CONCLUSIONS

Biventricular longitudinal strain values were lower when assessed by FT as compared to STE. Both methods were statistically comparable when measuring LV strain but not RV strain. These differences might be justified by the lower in-plane spatial and temporal resolution of FT, which is particularly relevant for the complex anatomy of the RV.

KEY POINTS

• Strain values were significantly lower when assessed by FT as compared to STE, which was expected due to the lower in-plane spatial and temporal resolution of FT versus STE. • Both methods were statistically comparable when measuring LV strain but not for RV strain analysis. • Characterizing the normal ranges and reproducibility of strain metrics by FT is an important step toward its clinical applicability, since it can be assessed offline and applied to routinely acquired cine CMR images.

摘要

目的

心肌变形与心脏维度相结合,可对心功能进行全面评估,这已被证明有助于区分心脏病理与对慢性强化训练等情况的生理性适应。特征追踪(FT)可从心脏磁共振(CMR)电影序列中测量心肌变形;然而,其准确性尚未得到充分验证。我们的目的是比较 FT 与斑点追踪超声心动图(STE)在高度训练的耐力运动员中的准确性和可重复性。

方法

93 名耐力运动员(过去 5 年每周训练> 12 小时,52%为男性,35 ± 5.1 岁)和 72 名年龄匹配的对照者接受静息 CMR 和经胸超声心动图检查,以评估双心室运动引起的重塑和双心室整体纵向应变(GLS),CMR-FT 和 STE 均可进行评估。

结果

与 STE 相比,CMR-FT 评估的应变值明显较低(p < 0.001),左心室的重复性较好(偏差= 3.94%,一致性界限[LOA] = ± 4.27%),但右心室应变的变异性更大。两种技术的应变值均随心室容积的增加而按比例降低,可能描述了运动员心脏的功能性双心室储备。

结论

与 STE 相比,FT 评估的双心室纵向应变值较低。两种方法在测量 LV 应变时在统计学上具有可比性,但在测量 RV 应变时则不然。FT 的平面内空间和时间分辨率较低,这对 RV 的复杂解剖结构尤其重要,因此这种差异是合理的。

要点

  • 与 STE 相比,FT 评估的应变值明显较低,这是由于 FT 的平面内空间和时间分辨率低于 STE 所致。

  • 两种方法在测量 LV 应变时在统计学上具有可比性,但在测量 RV 应变时则不然。

  • 对 FT 的应变指标进行正常范围和可重复性的特征描述是其临床应用的重要一步,因为它可以离线评估并应用于常规获取的 CMR 电影图像。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验