Suppr超能文献

补充与整合健康研究的实施科学方法。

Implementation Science Methodologies for Complementary and Integrative Health Research.

机构信息

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Altern Complement Med. 2021 Mar;27(S1):S7-S13. doi: 10.1089/acm.2020.0446.

Abstract

Published results of efficacy and effectiveness studies on complementary health approaches should lead to widespread uptake of evidence-based practices, but too often, the scientific pathway ends prematurely, before the best ways to improve adoption, implementation, and sustainability can be determined. The National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) supports the full continuum of the biomedical research pipeline, whereby a complementary health intervention moves from basic and mechanistic research through efficacy trials and through dissemination and implementation. Implementation science has traditionally been thought of as something that only happens after efficacy and effectiveness have been demonstrated, but it can be prudent to evaluate implementation measures earlier in the process. Implementation science assesses more than just barriers and facilitators; it evaluates specific implementation strategies and characterizes the extent that the intervention is modified within the context of the implementation strategy and health care delivery setting. The best choices for implementation science in complementary health interventions depend on the research questions. Implementation science that tests strategies to address implementation at multiple ecologic levels is a high priority to NCCIH.

摘要

已发表的补充健康方法的疗效和效果研究结果本应导致基于证据的实践的广泛采用,但在确定如何更好地促进采用、实施和可持续性之前,科学途径往往过早结束。国家补充与综合健康中心(NCCIH)支持补充健康干预措施从基础和机制研究到疗效试验,再到传播和实施的整个生物医学研究管道。实施科学传统上被认为是仅在证明疗效和有效性之后才会发生的事情,但在该过程的早期评估实施措施是谨慎的。实施科学不仅评估障碍和促进因素;它还评估特定的实施策略,并描述干预措施在实施策略和医疗保健提供环境中的修改程度。补充健康干预措施中实施科学的最佳选择取决于研究问题。在多个生态层面上测试解决实施问题的策略的实施科学是 NCCIH 的重中之重。

相似文献

2
Researchers as Advocates: What Does the Global "Berlin Agreement" Imply?作为倡导者的研究人员:全球“柏林协议”意味着什么?
J Altern Complement Med. 2017 May;23(5):317-319. doi: 10.1089/acm.2017.29025.jjw. Epub 2017 May 3.
7
Integrative Medicine and Case Management.整合医学与病例管理。
Prof Case Manag. 2016 May-Jun;21(3):111-3. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0000000000000152.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Reprint of: Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction.重印:实施研究中的定性方法:导论。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan;283:112629. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112629. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
3
Quantitative approaches for the evaluation of implementation research studies.定量方法在实施研究评估中的应用。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan;283:112521. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112521. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
4
Experimental and quasi-experimental designs in implementation research.实施研究中的实验和准实验设计。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan;283:112452. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.027. Epub 2019 Jun 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验