• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MRSA PCR 鼻拭子筛查时机的评估:阴性检测结果可用于排除多久内 MRSA 阳性呼吸道培养物?

Evaluation of the timing of MRSA PCR nasal screening: How long can a negative assay be used to rule out MRSA-positive respiratory cultures?

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Mobile Infirmary Medical Center, Mobile, AL, USA.

Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2021 May 24;78(Supplement_2):S57-S61. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab109.

DOI:10.1093/ajhp/zxab109
PMID:33788910
Abstract

PURPOSE

Previous studies indicate that the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) nasal assay for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has a consistently high (>95%) negative predictive value (NPV) in ruling out MRSA pneumonia; however, optimal timing of PCR assay specimen and respiratory culture collection is unclear.

METHODS

A study including 736 patients from a community hospital system was conducted. Patients were included if they had undergone MRSA nasal screening with a PCR assay and had documented positive respiratory culture results.

RESULTS

In the full cohort, the MRSA PCR nasal screen assay was demonstrated to have an NPV of 94.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.8%-96.5%) in ruling out MRSA-positive respiratory cultures. When evaluating the NPV by level of care (ie, where the MRSA PCR nasal assay sample was collected), no significant difference between values for samples collected in an intensive care unit vs medical/surgical units was identified (NPV [95%CI], 94.9% [92.7%-96.6%] vs 95.3% [88.4%-98.7%]). Additionally, NPV remained high with use of both invasive (NPV [95%CI], 96.8% [92.7%-99.0%]) and noninvasive (NPV [95%CI], 94.5% [91.7%-96.2%]) respiratory sampling methods. Finally, when evaluating the effect of time between MRSA PCR nasal screening and respiratory sample collection, we found high NPVs for all evaluated timeframes: within 24 hours, 93.8% (90.1%-96.4%); within 25 to 48 hours, 98.6% (92.7%-100.0%); within 49 hours to 7 days, 95.7% (91.4%-98.3%); within 8 to 14 days, 92.9% (85.1%-97.3%); and after more than 14 days, 95.5% (84.5%-99.4%).

CONCLUSION

We report high NPVs for up to 2 weeks between specimen collections, which allows clinicians to use a negative MRSA PCR nasal screen assay to rule out MRSA pneumonia, potentially leading to decreased exposure to MRSA-active antibiotics.

摘要

目的

先前的研究表明,聚合酶链反应(PCR)鼻腔检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)对排除 MRSA 肺炎具有一致的高(>95%)阴性预测值(NPV);然而,PCR 检测标本和呼吸道培养物采集的最佳时间尚不清楚。

方法

对来自社区医院系统的 736 例患者进行了一项研究。如果患者接受了 MRSA 鼻腔筛查的 PCR 检测,并且有阳性的呼吸道培养结果记录,则将其纳入研究。

结果

在全队列中,MRSA PCR 鼻腔筛查检测在排除 MRSA 阳性呼吸道培养物方面的 NPV 为 94.9%(95%置信区间[CI],92.8%-96.5%)。当按护理级别评估 NPV(即,采集 MRSA PCR 鼻腔检测样本的位置)时,在重症监护病房和医疗/外科病房采集的样本之间未发现 NPV 值有显著差异(NPV[95%CI],94.9%[92.7%-96.6%] vs 95.3%[88.4%-98.7%])。此外,使用有创(NPV[95%CI],96.8%[92.7%-99.0%])和无创(NPV[95%CI],94.5%[91.7%-96.2%])呼吸道采样方法时,NPV 仍保持较高水平。最后,当评估 MRSA PCR 鼻腔筛查与呼吸道样本采集之间的时间间隔的影响时,我们发现所有评估时间框架的 NPV 均较高:在 24 小时内,93.8%(90.1%-96.4%);在 25 至 48 小时内,98.6%(92.7%-100.0%);在 49 小时至 7 天内,95.7%(91.4%-98.3%);在 8 至 14 天内,92.9%(85.1%-97.3%);在 14 天以上时,95.5%(84.5%-99.4%)。

结论

我们报告了标本采集之间长达 2 周的高 NPV,这使得临床医生可以使用阴性的 MRSA PCR 鼻腔筛查检测来排除 MRSA 肺炎,从而可能减少接触 MRSA 活性抗生素。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the timing of MRSA PCR nasal screening: How long can a negative assay be used to rule out MRSA-positive respiratory cultures?MRSA PCR 鼻拭子筛查时机的评估:阴性检测结果可用于排除多久内 MRSA 阳性呼吸道培养物?
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2021 May 24;78(Supplement_2):S57-S61. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab109.
2
Using Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Screens to Rule Out Methicillin-Resistant S aureus Pneumonia in Surgical Intensive Care Units.使用耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌鼻腔筛查来排除外科重症监护病房中的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌肺炎。
J Surg Res. 2023 Dec;292:317-323. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.07.053. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
3
Evaluating Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Polymerase Chain Reaction Nasal Screening as a Tool for Antimicrobial Stewardship.评估耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌聚合酶链反应鼻腔筛查作为抗菌药物管理工具。
J Surg Res. 2023 Mar;283:1047-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.11.054. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
4
Systematic Review of the Clinical Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Screening for MRSA Pneumonia.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)鼻腔筛查对 MRSA 肺炎的临床效用的系统评价。
Ann Pharmacother. 2019 Jun;53(6):627-638. doi: 10.1177/1060028018823027. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
5
Clinical utility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal polymerase chain reaction assay in critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌鼻腔聚合酶链反应检测在重症医院获得性肺炎患者中的临床应用价值
J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:168-171. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
6
The Clinical Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Screening to Rule Out MRSA Pneumonia: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis With Antimicrobial Stewardship Implications.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)鼻腔筛查排除 MRSA 肺炎的临床实用性:一项具有抗菌药物管理意义的诊断荟萃分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jun 18;67(1):1-7. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy024.
7
Impact of Prior-to-Admission Methicillin-Resistant Nares Screening in Critically Ill Adults With Pneumonia.入院前耐甲氧西林鼻腔筛查对重症肺炎成人患者的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2022 Feb;56(2):124-130. doi: 10.1177/10600280211023209. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
8
Evaluation of the reliability of MRSA screens in patients undergoing universal decolonization.评估在接受普遍去定植的患者中进行的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌筛查的可靠性。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020 Nov 16;77(23):1965-1972. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa284.
9
Utility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal screening in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)鼻腔筛查在急性髓系白血病(AML)患者中的应用。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;23(4):e13612. doi: 10.1111/tid.13612. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
10
Positive nasal polymerase chain reaction assay is not sensitive in predicting concurrent or subsequent infection in critically ill patients.鼻腔聚合酶链反应检测呈阳性在预测重症患者并发或后续感染方面并不敏感。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2020 May;48(3):196-202. doi: 10.1177/0310057X20911925. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Culture harder: use more specimens to increase methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus culture yield relative to PCR.加大培养力度:使用更多样本以提高耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌培养相对于聚合酶链反应的产量。
Access Microbiol. 2025 Jun 3;7(6). doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000918.v4. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing the Predictive Value of Methicillin-Resistant Nares Colonization Among Transplant Recipients and Patients With Neutropenia.评估移植受者和中性粒细胞减少患者鼻腔耐甲氧西林定植的预测价值。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Jul 16;11(7):ofae408. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae408. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal PCR Testing in Pediatric Patients With Suspected Respiratory Infections.
耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌鼻腔 PCR 检测在疑似呼吸道感染的儿科患者中的应用。
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2024 Apr 24;13(4):242-245. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piae023.
4
Positivity of repeat nasal MRSA PCR screening: a single-center experience.重复鼻腔耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌聚合酶链反应筛查的阳性率:单中心经验
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023 Dec 4;3(1):e226. doi: 10.1017/ash.2023.491. eCollection 2023.
5
Performance of Methicillin-Resistant Polymerase Chain Reaction Nasal Screening for Ruling Out MRSA Pneumonia in Hospitalized, Immunocompromised Patients.耐甲氧西林聚合酶链反应鼻腔筛查在排除住院免疫功能低下患者的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌肺炎中的应用
J Pharm Technol. 2023 Aug;39(4):191-194. doi: 10.1177/87551225231182876. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
6
Antimicrobial Stewardship Techniques for Critically Ill Patients with Pneumonia.重症肺炎患者的抗菌药物管理技术
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Feb 1;12(2):295. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12020295.
7
Predictors of discordant MRSA nares and respiratory cultures in patients with pneumonia.肺炎患者鼻腔和呼吸道耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌培养结果不一致的预测因素
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Sep 30;4(5):dlac095. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac095. eCollection 2022 Oct.