• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意间隙:计算机断层扫描时代的牙槽骨移植修复。

Mind the Gap: Alveolar Bone Graft Revision in the Era of Computed Tomography.

机构信息

Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.

出版信息

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022 Feb;59(2):246-253. doi: 10.1177/10556656211002689. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1177/10556656211002689
PMID:33789502
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rate of revision alveolar bone grafting (ABG) in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) before and after the introduction of postoperative computed tomography (CT).

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study analyzing the incidence of revision ABG in patients with and without postoperative CT scans for graft success evaluation.

SETTING

Academic tertiary care pediatric hospital.

PATIENTS

Eighty-seven patients with CLP or cleft lip and alveolus treated with autologous iliac crest bone grafting for alveolar clefts over a 10-year period (January 2009 to March 2019) with minimum 6-month follow-up. Fifty patients had postoperative CT evaluation; 37 did not.

INTERVENTIONS

Postoperative CT to determine ABG success, versus standard clinical examination and 2-dimensional radiographs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Requirement for revision ABG, defined as failure of the original graft by clinical or radiographic examination.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight percent of patients underwent a postoperative CT scan at median interval of 10 months after surgery. Patients with postoperative CT evaluation had a 44% rate of revision ABG (22/50) for inadequate graft take, compared to 5% (2/37) in patients without postoperative CT ( < .001; 95% CT, 31%-58% in the CT group, 1%-16% in the non-CT group).

CONCLUSIONS

Computed tomography evaluation after ABG is associated with a significantly increased revision rate for inadequate graft take. The presence of a secondary palatal fistula at the time of original ABG is not associated with revision requirement. Lack of standardized dental and orthodontic records complicates the study of ABG outcomes and presents an area for systems-based improvement.

摘要

目的

确定唇腭裂(CLP)患者在引入术后计算机断层扫描(CT)前后牙槽骨移植(ABG)翻修率。

设计

回顾性病例对照研究,分析有和无术后 CT 扫描评估移植成功率的患者中 ABG 翻修的发生率。

设置

学术性三级儿科医院。

患者

87 例 CLP 或唇裂合并牙槽裂患者,在 10 年期间(2009 年 1 月至 2019 年 3 月)接受自体髂嵴骨移植治疗牙槽裂,随访时间至少 6 个月。50 例患者有术后 CT 评估;37 例没有。

干预措施

术后 CT 用于确定 ABG 成功,而不是标准的临床检查和二维射线照相。

主要观察指标

需要进行 ABG 翻修,定义为原始移植物在临床或影像学检查中失败。

结果

58%的患者在术后 10 个月的中位数间隔进行了术后 CT 扫描。接受术后 CT 评估的患者中,44%(22/50)的患者因移植物吸收不良需要进行 ABG 翻修,而未接受术后 CT 评估的患者中只有 5%(2/37)(<.001;95% CT,CT 组为 31%-58%,非 CT 组为 1%-16%)。

结论

ABG 后 CT 评估与因移植物吸收不良而进行翻修的比率显著增加相关。在原始 ABG 时存在腭后瘘并不与翻修要求相关。缺乏标准化的牙科和正畸记录使 ABG 结果的研究变得复杂,并为基于系统的改进提供了一个领域。

相似文献

1
Mind the Gap: Alveolar Bone Graft Revision in the Era of Computed Tomography.注意间隙:计算机断层扫描时代的牙槽骨移植修复。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022 Feb;59(2):246-253. doi: 10.1177/10556656211002689. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
2
A Multicenter Study Using the SWAG Scale to Compare Secondary Alveolar Bone Graft Outcomes for Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.一项使用SWAG量表比较唇腭裂患者二期牙槽骨植骨结果的多中心研究。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016 Mar;53(2):180-6. doi: 10.1597/14-215. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
3
Efficacy of Demineralized Bone Matrix for Revision Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients Previously Treated with Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (BMP-2).脱矿骨基质在曾接受骨形态发生蛋白 2(BMP-2)治疗的患者中进行牙槽骨修复的效果。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Jul;61(7):1179-1185. doi: 10.1177/10556656231159259. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
4
Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Unilateral and Bilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate: A Single-Institution Outcomes Evaluation Using Three-Dimensional Cone Beam Computed Tomography.单侧和双侧完全性唇腭裂患者的二期牙槽骨植骨:一项使用三维锥形束计算机断层扫描的单机构疗效评估
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Jun 1;149(6):1404-1411. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009142. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
5
Secondary alveolar bone grafting using autologous versus alloplastic material in the treatment of cleft lip and palate patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.自体与异体材料在唇腭裂患者牙槽骨二次骨移植中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prog Orthod. 2019 Feb 11;20(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40510-018-0252-y.
6
Changes in grafted autogenous bone during edgewise treatment in patients with unilateral cleft lip/palate or alveolus.单侧唇裂/腭裂或牙槽突裂患者在方丝弓治疗过程中自体移植骨的变化。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014 Sep;51(5):525-32. doi: 10.1597/12-281. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
7
What is the Success Rate of Repeat Alveolar Bone Graft?重复牙槽骨移植的成功率是多少?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Mar;82(3):288-293. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2023.11.009. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
8
Reliability of the SWAG-The Standardized Way to Assess Grafts Method for Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.SWAG的可靠性——唇腭裂患者牙槽骨移植评估移植物的标准化方法
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017 Nov;54(6):680-686. doi: 10.1597/14-214. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
9
Assessment of bone resorption after secondary alveolar bone grafting using three-dimensional computed tomography: a three-year study.使用三维计算机断层扫描评估二次牙槽骨移植后的骨吸收:一项为期三年的研究。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007 Mar;44(2):142-8. doi: 10.1597/06-047.1.
10
Ideal Versus Late Secondary Alveolar Bone Graft Surgery: A Bone-Thickness Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Assessment.理想与晚期二期牙槽骨移植手术:骨厚度的锥形束计算机断层扫描评估
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Mar;55(3):369-374. doi: 10.1177/1055665617738401. Epub 2017 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Autogenous Bilateral Cleft Alveolar Bone Grafting with rhBMP-2 and Cellular Bone Matrix.自体双侧腭裂牙槽骨移植联合重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2和细胞骨基质
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Aug 6:10556656241271672. doi: 10.1177/10556656241271672.