Suppr超能文献

院外心脏骤停后,院前机械胸外按压装置的使用与心脏骤停后护理对临床结局的交互作用。

Interaction Effect Between Prehospital Mechanical Chest Compression Device Use and Post-Cardiac Arrest Care on Clinical Outcomes After Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea; Laboratory of Emergency Medical Services, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Laboratory of Emergency Medical Services, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;61(2):119-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Mar 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prehospital application of a mechanical chest compression device (MCD) and post-cardiac arrest (PCA) care including coronary reperfusion therapy (CRT) or targeted temperature management (TTM) could affect the clinical outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess whether the effect of PCA care including CRT or TTM differs according to prehospital MCD use in patients with OHCA.

METHODS

Adult OHCA cases with a presumed cardiac etiology and with survival to admission from 2016 to 2017 were enrolled from the Korean nationwide OHCA registry. The main exposures were CRT and TTM during PCA care. The primary outcome was good neurologic recovery defined by a cerebral performance category score of 1 or 2 at hospital discharge. We conducted interaction analyses between MCD use and PCA care including CRT or TTM.

RESULTS

Four thousand three hundred sixty-six OHCA cases were enrolled and 7.9% underwent MCD application. TTM and CRT were performed in 11.2% and 17.9% of the study population. In the interaction analysis, the adjusted odds ratios of TTM and CRT for good neurologic recovery were 2.41 (1.90-3.06) and 3.40 (2.79-4.14) in patients without MCD use and 1.89 (0.97-3.68), and 1.54 (0.79-3.01) in patients with MCD use.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of PCA care on neurologic outcomes was different according to MCD use in OHCA. The association of good neurologic outcome and PCA care was not observed in the prehospital MCD use group compared with that in the MCD nonuse group.

摘要

背景

院前使用机械胸部按压设备(MCD)和心脏骤停后(PCA)护理,包括冠状动脉再灌注治疗(CRT)或目标温度管理(TTM),可能会影响院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的临床结局。

目的

本研究旨在评估 OHCA 患者 PCA 护理中是否包括 CRT 或 TTM 的效果是否因院前使用 MCD 而不同。

方法

从 2016 年至 2017 年,从韩国全国 OHCA 注册中心纳入具有推定心脏病因且存活至入院的成年 OHCA 病例。主要暴露因素为 PCA 护理期间的 CRT 和 TTM。主要结局是出院时脑功能分类评分 1 或 2 的良好神经恢复。我们对 MCD 使用与包括 CRT 或 TTM 的 PCA 护理之间进行了交互分析。

结果

共纳入 4366 例 OHCA 病例,其中 7.9%的患者使用了 MCD。TTM 和 CRT 在研究人群中的使用率分别为 11.2%和 17.9%。在交互分析中,在未使用 MCD 的患者中,TTM 和 CRT 对良好神经恢复的调整比值比分别为 2.41(1.90-3.06)和 3.40(2.79-4.14),而在使用 MCD 的患者中,这两个比值比分别为 1.89(0.97-3.68)和 1.54(0.79-3.01)。

结论

OHCA 中,PCA 护理对神经结局的影响因 MCD 使用而异。与 MCD 未使用者相比,在 MCD 使用者中,良好神经结局与 PCA 护理之间的相关性并未观察到。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验