Gunalan Anitha, Sistla Sujatha, Sastry Apurba S, Venkateswaran Ramanathan
Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Department of Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar;25(3):296-298. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23753.
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common hospital-acquired infections among mechanically ventilated patients and the incidence rates are widely used as an index of quality of care given in an ICU. Since there is no gold standard method available to diagnose VAP, the incidence rate varies based on different criteria used for calculation. Therefore, we conducted a study to determine the concordance between the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance criteria and clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) criteria for the diagnosis of VAP. This was a prospective study that evaluated patients in the medical intensive care units (MICUs) of a tertiary care hospital, India, who were intubated for >48 hours between October 2018 and September 2019. All the patients (n = 273) were followed up daily and assessed using both CPIS and NHSN surveillance criteria for diagnosing VAP. Of these 273 patients, 93 patients (34.1%) had VAP according to CPIS criteria as compared with 33 patients (12.1%) using the NHSN criteria. The corresponding rates of VAP were 39.59 vs 11.53 cases per 1,000 ventilator days, respectively. The agreement of the two sets of criteria was fairly good (kappa statistics, 0.42) The NHSN surveillance criteria have a lower sensitivity in detecting VAP cases and have to be modified to achieve better results. Gunalan A, Sistla S, Sastry AS, Venkateswaran R. Concordance between the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Surveillance Criteria and Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) Criteria for Diagnosis of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia (VAP). Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(3):296-298.
呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)是机械通气患者中最常见的医院获得性感染之一,其发病率被广泛用作重症监护病房(ICU)护理质量的指标。由于目前尚无诊断VAP的金标准方法,发病率会因计算所采用的不同标准而有所差异。因此,我们开展了一项研究,以确定美国国家医疗安全网络(NHSN)监测标准与临床肺部感染评分(CPIS)标准在诊断VAP方面的一致性。这是一项前瞻性研究,评估了印度一家三级护理医院内科重症监护病房(MICU)中于2018年10月至2019年9月期间插管时间超过48小时的患者。所有患者(n = 273)均接受每日随访,并使用CPIS和NHSN监测标准对VAP进行诊断评估。在这273例患者中,根据CPIS标准,有93例患者(34.1%)发生了VAP,而按照NHSN标准则为33例患者(12.1%)。VAP的相应发生率分别为每1000个呼吸机日39.59例和11.53例。两组标准的一致性相当好(kappa统计值为0.42)。NHSN监测标准在检测VAP病例方面敏感性较低,必须进行修改以取得更好的结果。古纳兰·A、西斯特拉·S、萨斯特里·A·S、文卡特斯瓦兰·R。美国国家医疗安全网络(NHSN)监测标准与临床肺部感染评分(CPIS)标准在诊断呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)方面的一致性。《印度重症监护医学杂志》2021年;25(3):296 - 298。