Suppr超能文献

非典型慢性炎性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病的治疗方法

Treatment Approaches for Atypical CIDP.

作者信息

Menon Deepak, Katzberg Hans Dieter, Bril Vera

机构信息

Ellen & Martin Prosserman Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2021 Mar 15;12:653734. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.653734. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The variants of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) differ not just in their clinical, pathological and electrophysiological characteristics, but often in their indifferent response to conventional immunosuppressive agents which are effective in typical CIDP. High quality evidence is lacking as far as the management of these atypical variants is concerned. In this review, we summarize the treatment approaches to each of these CIDP variants based on existing data. Distal acquired demyelinating symmetric polyneuropathy (DADS) has the phenotype of a symmetric, demyelinating sensory, length-dependent polyneuropathy and is frequently associated with paraproteinemia and anti myelin associated glycoprotein (MAG) antibodies. While the management of idiopathic DADS (DADS-I) is the same as CIDP, DADS-M responds suboptimally and has a favorable response to rituximab. Multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy (MADSAM) manifests as a chronic progressive demyelinating mononeuropathy multiplex which can evolve to a confluent pattern indistinguishable from CIDP. Evidence favors treating MADSAM with conventional immunomodulatory therapy (IMT), but this disorder responds less favorably than CIDP. Some patients present with purely sensory symptoms, known as pure sensory CIDP or chronic inflammatory sensory polyradiculoneuropathy (CISP), the latter localizing to a pre-ganglionic pathology. Both respond well to first line IMT, particularly to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), but patients relapse without maintenance therapy. Pure motor CIDP resembles multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block (MMNCB), but the previously reported worsening status after steroid treatment was not reproduced in recent studies, and IVIG remains the first-line therapy. Some focal forms of CIDP defy exact classification, but respond well to first-line IMT including IVIG. Overall, atypical CIDP responds to treatment with first-line IMT, but has a suboptimal response compared to CIDP. There is evidence for effectiveness with agents such as rituximab, especially in DADS-M, and this medication can also be used in cases refractory to conventional IMTs. Rituximab is also effective in CIDP with IgG4 antibodies which has distinct clinical features and is mostly refractory to first-line IMT.

摘要

慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病(CIDP)的变异型不仅在临床、病理和电生理特征上有所不同,而且对典型CIDP有效的传统免疫抑制剂的反应往往也不同。就这些非典型变异型的治疗而言,目前缺乏高质量的证据。在本综述中,我们根据现有数据总结了每种CIDP变异型的治疗方法。远端获得性脱髓鞘性对称性多发性神经病(DADS)具有对称性、脱髓鞘性感觉性、长度依赖性多发性神经病的表型,且常与副蛋白血症和抗髓鞘相关糖蛋白(MAG)抗体相关。虽然特发性DADS(DADS-I)的治疗与CIDP相同,但DADS-M的反应欠佳,对利妥昔单抗反应良好。多灶性获得性脱髓鞘性感觉和运动神经病(MADSAM)表现为慢性进行性脱髓鞘性多灶性单神经病,可发展为与CIDP难以区分的融合模式。有证据支持用传统免疫调节疗法(IMT)治疗MADSAM,但这种疾病的反应不如CIDP。一些患者表现为纯感觉症状,称为纯感觉性CIDP或慢性炎症性感觉性多神经根神经病(CISP),后者定位于节前病变。两者对一线IMT均反应良好,尤其是对静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG),但患者在无维持治疗的情况下会复发。纯运动性CIDP类似于多灶性运动神经病伴传导阻滞(MMNCB),但最近的研究未再现先前报道的类固醇治疗后病情恶化的情况,IVIG仍然是一线治疗方法。一些局灶性CIDP亚型难以确切分类,但对包括IVIG在内的一线IMT反应良好。总体而言,非典型CIDP对一线IMT治疗有反应,但与CIDP相比反应欠佳。有证据表明利妥昔单抗等药物有效,尤其是在DADS-M中,这种药物也可用于对传统IMT难治的病例。利妥昔单抗对伴有IgG4抗体的CIDP也有效,后者具有独特的临床特征,且大多对一线IMT难治。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f291/8005557/ebbf87e81412/fneur-12-653734-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验