Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands,
Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Neuroepidemiology. 2019;52(3-4):161-172. doi: 10.1159/000494291. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
Prevalence and incidence rates of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) are required to determine the impact of CIDP on society. We aimed to estimate the prevalence and incidence of CIDP worldwide and to determine the effect of diagnostic criteria on prevalence and incidence.
A systematic review was conducted for all published incidence and prevalence studies on CIDP until May 18, 2017. Methodological quality was assessed using the Methodological Evaluation of Observational Research checklist. We performed a random effect meta-analysis to estimate pooled prevalence and incidence rates.
Of the 907 studies, 11 were included in the systematic review, 5 in the meta-analysis of incidence (818 cases; 220,513,514 person-years) and 9 in the meta-analysis of prevalence (3,160 cases; 160,765,325 population). These studies had a moderate quality. The pooled crude incidence rate was 0.33 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI 0.21-0.53; I2 = 95.7%) and the pooled prevalence rate was 2.81 per 100,000 (95% CI 1.58-4.39; I2 = 99.1%). Substantial heterogeneity in incidence and prevalence across studies seems to be partly explained by using different diagnostic criteria.
These findings provide a starting point to estimate the social burden of CIDP and demonstrate the need to reach consensus on diagnostic criteria for CIDP.
为了评估慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病(CIDP)对社会的影响,需要确定 CIDP 的患病率和发病率。我们旨在估算全球 CIDP 的患病率和发病率,并确定诊断标准对患病率和发病率的影响。
对截至 2017 年 5 月 18 日所有发表的 CIDP 发病率和患病率研究进行了系统评价。采用观察性研究方法评估清单评估方法学质量。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析,以估算汇总的患病率和发病率。
在 907 项研究中,有 11 项被纳入系统评价,5 项被纳入发病率荟萃分析(818 例;220,513,514 人年),9 项被纳入患病率荟萃分析(3,160 例;160,765,325 人口)。这些研究的质量为中等。汇总的粗发病率为 0.33/100,000 人年(95%CI 0.21-0.53;I2=95.7%),汇总的患病率为 2.81/100,000(95%CI 1.58-4.39;I2=99.1%)。研究间发病率和患病率的显著异质性部分似乎可以用不同的诊断标准来解释。
这些发现为估算 CIDP 的社会负担提供了一个起点,并表明需要就 CIDP 的诊断标准达成共识。