Department of Surgery & Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Front Immunol. 2021 Mar 15;12:652007. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.652007. eCollection 2021.
Until recently, the treatment landscape for hepatocellular cancer (HCC) was dominated by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) which offered an overall survival (OS) benefit when used both in the first-and second-line setting compared to best supportive care. However, the treatment landscape has changed with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of HCC with significant improvement in OS and progression free survival reported with combination atezolizumab and bevacizumab compared to sorafenib in the first-line setting. Nonetheless, the response to ICIs is 20-30% and invariably patients will progress. What remains unclear is which therapeutics should be used following ICI exposure. Extrapolating from the evidence base in renal cell carcinoma, subsequent therapy with TKIs offers both a response and survival benefit and are recommended by European guidelines. However, there are a number of novel therapies emerging that target mechanisms of ICI resistance that hold promise both in combination with ICI or as subsequent therapy. This paper will discuss the evidence for ICIs in HCC, the position of second-line therapies following ICIs and research strategies moving forward.
直到最近,肝细胞癌 (HCC) 的治疗领域一直由酪氨酸激酶抑制剂 (TKI) 主导,与最佳支持治疗相比,TKI 在一线和二线治疗中均能带来总生存期 (OS) 的获益。然而,随着免疫检查点抑制剂 (ICI) 的引入,HCC 的治疗格局发生了变化,与索拉非尼相比,阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗在一线治疗中显著提高了 OS 和无进展生存期。尽管如此,ICI 的反应率为 20-30%,患者不可避免地会进展。目前尚不清楚在接受 ICI 治疗后应该使用哪种治疗方法。从肾细胞癌的证据基础推断,ICI 后使用 TKI 既可以带来缓解,也可以带来生存获益,这也得到了欧洲指南的推荐。然而,有许多新的治疗方法正在涌现,这些方法针对 ICI 耐药的机制,无论是与 ICI 联合使用还是作为二线治疗都有一定的应用前景。本文将讨论 HCC 中 ICI 的应用,ICI 后的二线治疗方法以及未来的研究策略。