Bayer C W, Black M S, Galloway L M
Georgia Tech Research Institute, Environmental Monitoring Research Branch, Atlanta 30332.
J Chromatogr Sci. 1988 Apr;26(4):168-73. doi: 10.1093/chromsci/26.4.168.
Comparisons are made of two techniques for the trace analysis of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from consumer products: direct on-line sampling and analysis and on-line solid sorbent collection followed by off-line analysis. Two types of direct analyses are examined. The first consists of direct injection of emissions from a sample loaded environmental chamber into a gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) for compound identification. Direct injection of headspace collected emissions into a gas chromatograph equipped with a mass selective detector is the second direct method scrutinized. The more traditional technique of solid sorbent collection of the volatile organic emissions followed by thermal desorption (TD)/gas chromatographic (GC)/mass spectrometric (MS) analysis is compared to both direct on-line methods.
对两种用于痕量分析消费品中挥发性有机化合物(VOC)排放的技术进行了比较:直接在线采样与分析以及在线固体吸附剂收集随后进行离线分析。研究了两种类型的直接分析。第一种是将来自装有样品的环境舱的排放物直接注入配备火焰离子化检测器(FID)的气相色谱仪中以进行化合物鉴定。将顶空收集的排放物直接注入配备质量选择检测器的气相色谱仪是第二种经过仔细研究的直接方法。将更传统的挥发性有机排放物固体吸附剂收集随后进行热脱附(TD)/气相色谱(GC)/质谱(MS)分析的技术与两种直接在线方法进行了比较。