Suppr超能文献

低位直肠癌中阳性侧方盆淋巴结:我们现在应该改变治疗策略吗?

Positive lateral pelvic lymph nodes in low rectal cancer: should we change our practice now?

机构信息

Colorectal Surgery Unit, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Surgery (Western Precinct), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2021 May;91(5):947-953. doi: 10.1111/ans.16779. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) in the treatment of patients with low rectal cancer with enlarged lateral lymph nodes (LLN+) is under investigation. Enthusiasm for LLND stems from a perceived reduction in local recurrence (LR). We aimed to compare the LR rate for LLN+ patients with LLN- patients, treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and surgery, in a hospital that does not perform LLND.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all patients with clinical stage 3 low rectal cancer who completed nCRT and surgery between 2008 and 2017 at Western Health was performed. Outcomes for LLN+ patients were compared with LLN- patients. The primary outcome was LR. Secondary outcomes included distant metastases, disease-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

There were 110 patients treated for stage 3 low rectal cancer over 10 years. There was no significant difference in the LR rate, with one LR from 28 LLN+ patients and one LR from 82 LLN- patients (4% versus 1.2%, P = 0.44). There were no significant differences in median disease-free survival (41 versus 52 months, P = 0.19) or mean overall survival (62 versus 60 months, P = 0.80). Of all patients studied, 21% developed distant metastases.

CONCLUSION

LR after nCRT and surgery in patients with stage 3 rectal cancer is rare, irrespective of lateral pelvic node status. These data, along with the uncertain benefit and known risks of LLND, supports the continued use of standard therapy in these patients. Strategies to address distant failure in these patients should be explored.

摘要

背景

对于伴有侧方淋巴结肿大(LLN+)的低位直肠癌患者,侧方淋巴结清扫(LLND)在治疗中的作用仍在研究中。人们热衷于行 LLND 的原因在于其可以降低局部复发(LR)率。我们旨在比较在未行 LLND 的医院中,接受新辅助放化疗(nCRT)和手术治疗的 LLN+和 LLN-患者的 LR 率。

方法

对 2008 年至 2017 年期间在 Western Health 接受 nCRT 加手术治疗的所有临床 III 期低位直肠癌患者进行了一项回顾性研究。比较了 LLN+患者和 LLN-患者的结局。主要结局是 LR。次要结局包括远处转移、无疾病生存和总生存。

结果

在 10 年期间,有 110 例患者接受了 III 期低位直肠癌治疗。LLN+患者的 LR 率与 LLN-患者没有显著差异,28 例 LLN+患者中有 1 例发生 LR,82 例 LLN-患者中有 1 例发生 LR(4%比 1.2%,P=0.44)。无疾病生存中位数(41 比 52 个月,P=0.19)或总生存平均值(62 比 60 个月,P=0.80)也无显著差异。所有研究患者中,有 21%发生远处转移。

结论

nCRT 和手术治疗 III 期直肠癌患者的 LR 罕见,而不论侧方骨盆淋巴结状态如何。这些数据以及对 LLND 获益和风险的不确定,支持对这些患者继续使用标准治疗。应探讨解决这些患者远处转移失败的策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验