Suppr超能文献

局部复发在接受新辅助(放化疗)治疗后的低位直肠癌患者中:国际多中心比较研究。

Local recurrences in western low rectal cancer patients treated with or without lateral lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy: An international multi-centre comparative study.

机构信息

Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Faculty of Health and Medical Science, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;47(9):2441-2449. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.06.004. Epub 2021 Jun 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the West, low rectal cancer patients with abnormal lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) are commonly treated with neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (nCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Additionally, some perform a lateral lymph node dissection (LLND). To date, no comparative data (nCRT vs. nCRT + LLND) are available in Western patients.

METHODS

An international multi-centre cohort study was conducted at six centres from the Netherlands, US and Australia. Patients with low rectal cancers from the Netherlands and Australia with abnormal LLNs (≥5 mm short-axis in the obturator, internal iliac, external iliac and/or common iliac basin) who underwent nCRT and TME (LLND-group) were compared to similarly staged patients from the US who underwent a LLND in addition to nCRT and TME (LLND + group).

RESULTS

LLND + patients (n = 44) were younger with higher ASA-classifications and ypN-stages compared to LLND-patients (n = 115). LLND + patients had larger median LLNs short-axes and received more adjuvant chemotherapy (100 vs. 30%; p < 0.0001). Between groups, the local recurrence rate (LRR) was 3% for LLND + vs. 11% for LLND- (p = 0.13). Disease-free survival (DFS, p = 0.94) and overall survival (OS, p = 0.42) were similar. On multivariable analysis, LLND was an independent significant factor for local recurrences (p = 0.01). Sub-analysis of patients who underwent long-course nCRT and had adjuvant chemotherapy (LLND-n = 30, LLND + n = 44) demonstrated a lower LRR for LLND + patients (3% vs. 16% for LLND-; p = 0.04). DFS (p = 0.10) and OS (p = 0.11) were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

A LLND in addition to nCRT may improve loco-regional control in Western patients with low rectal cancer and abnormal LLNs. Larger studies in Western patients are required to evaluate its contribution.

摘要

背景

在西方,侧向淋巴结异常(LLN)的低位直肠癌患者通常接受新辅助(放化疗)后全直肠系膜切除术(TME)治疗。此外,一些患者还进行侧方淋巴结清扫术(LLND)。迄今为止,尚无西方患者的比较数据(nCRT 与 nCRT+LLND)。

方法

在荷兰、美国和澳大利亚的 6 个中心进行了一项国际多中心队列研究。荷兰和澳大利亚的低位直肠癌患者,侧向淋巴结异常(闭孔、髂内、髂外和/或髂总淋巴结短轴≥5mm),接受 nCRT 和 TME(LLND 组),并与美国接受 nCRT 和 TME 加 LLND(LLND+组)的类似分期患者进行比较。

结果

与 LLND 患者(n=115)相比,LLND+患者(n=44)年龄较小,ASA 分级和 ypN 分期较高。LLND+患者的侧方淋巴结短轴中位数较大,且接受辅助化疗的比例更高(100% vs. 30%;p<0.0001)。两组间局部复发率(LRR)分别为 3%(LLND+)和 11%(LLND-)(p=0.13)。无病生存率(DFS,p=0.94)和总生存率(OS,p=0.42)相似。多变量分析显示,LLND 是局部复发的独立显著因素(p=0.01)。对接受长程 nCRT 并接受辅助化疗的患者(LLND-n=30,LLND+ n=44)进行亚分析显示,LLND+患者的 LRR 较低(LLND-为 3%,LLND+为 16%;p=0.04)。DFS(p=0.10)和 OS(p=0.11)在两组间相似。

结论

在西方低位直肠癌和侧向淋巴结异常的患者中,在 nCRT 之外进行 LLND 可能会改善局部区域控制。需要对西方患者进行更大规模的研究,以评估其作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验