Li Si-Yi, Zhou Ming-Gang, Ye Tao, Cheng Lian-Chao, Zhu Feng, Cui Cai-Yan, Zhang Yu-Mei, Cai Lin
Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, 82 Qinglong St. Chengdu, 610015 Sichuan, P. R. China.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Mar 30;22(1):239-245. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm.2021.01.103.
The burden of cardiovascular disease is predicted to escalate in developing countries. The aim of this study is to assess the characteristics, management strategies and outcomes of the patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who were admitted to hospitals under the chest pain center mode in southwest P. R. China. Adults hospitalized with a diagnosis of ACS were enrolled in the retrospective, observational registry between January 2017 and June 2019 at 11 hospitals in Chengdu, P. R. China. The collected data included the patients' baseline characteristics, clinical management and in-hospital outcomes. After Statistical analysis, (1) A total of 2857 patients with ACS, among which 1482 have ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 681 have non-STEMI (NSTEMI) and 694 have unstable angina (UA) were enrolled in the study. (2) 61.3% of the ACS patients received reperfusion therapy. More patients with STEMI underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with NSTEMI/UA patients (80.6% vs. 38.8%, < 0.001), while thrombolytics were administered in only 1.8% of STEMI patients. (3) The median time from symptoms to hospital was 190 min (IQR 94-468) in STEMI, 283 min (IQR 112-1084) in NSTEMI and 337 min (IQR 97-2220) in UA ( < 0.001), and the door-to-balloon time for primary PCI (pPCI) was 85 min (IQR 55-121) in STEMI. (4) The in-hospital outcomes for STEMI patients included death (8.1%) and acute heart failure (22.6%), while the outcomes for those with NSTEMI and UA were better: death (4.0% and 0.9%, < 0.001) and acute heart failure (15.3% and 9.9%, < 0.001). (5) Antiplatelet drugs, lipid-lowering drugs, β-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) /angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) were used in about 98.3%, 95.0%, 67.7% and 54.3% of the ACS patients, respectively. Therefore, the management capacity in Chengdu has relatively increased compared with previous studies, but important gaps still exist compared with developed countries, especially regarding the management of the NSTEMI/UA patients.
预计心血管疾病负担在发展中国家将不断加重。本研究旨在评估中国西南部地区在胸痛中心模式下收治的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的特征、管理策略及预后。2017年1月至2019年6月期间,在中国成都的11家医院,对诊断为ACS的住院成人患者进行了一项回顾性观察登记研究。收集的数据包括患者的基线特征、临床管理情况及住院期间的预后。经统计分析,(1)本研究共纳入2857例ACS患者,其中1482例为ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI),681例为非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI),694例为不稳定型心绞痛(UA)。(2)61.3%的ACS患者接受了再灌注治疗。与NSTEMI/UA患者相比,STEMI患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的比例更高(80.6%对38.8%,P<0.001),而仅1.8%的STEMI患者接受了溶栓治疗。(3)STEMI患者从症状发作到入院的中位时间为190分钟(四分位间距94 - 468),NSTEMI患者为283分钟(四分位间距112 - 1084),UA患者为337分钟(四分位间距97 - 2220)(P<0.001),STEMI患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(pPCI)的门球时间为85分钟(四分位间距55 - 121)。(4)STEMI患者的住院预后包括死亡(8.1%)和急性心力衰竭(22.6%),而NSTEMI和UA患者的预后较好:死亡(4.0%和0.9%,P<0.001)和急性心力衰竭(15.3%和9.9%,P<0.001)。(5)约98.3%、95.0%、67.7%和54.3%的ACS患者分别使用了抗血小板药物、降脂药物、β受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)。因此,与以往研究相比,成都地区的管理能力有所提高,但与发达国家相比仍存在重大差距,尤其是在NSTEMI/UA患者的管理方面。