• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将历史信息纳入以改善 I 期临床试验。

Incorporating historical information to improve phase I clinical trials.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Pharm Stat. 2021 Nov;20(6):1017-1034. doi: 10.1002/pst.2121. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1002/pst.2121
PMID:33793044
Abstract

Incorporating historical data has a great potential to improve the efficiency of phase I clinical trials and to accelerate drug development. For model-based designs, such as the continuous reassessment method (CRM), this can be conveniently carried out by specifying a "skeleton," that is, the prior estimate of dose limiting toxicity (DLT) probability at each dose. In contrast, little work has been done to incorporate historical data into model-assisted designs, such as the Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN), Keyboard, and modified toxicity probability interval (mTPI) designs. This has led to the misconception that model-assisted designs cannot incorporate prior information. In this paper, we propose a unified framework that allows for incorporating historical data into model-assisted designs. The proposed approach uses the well-established "skeleton" approach, combined with the concept of prior effective sample size, thus it is easy to understand and use. More importantly, our approach maintains the hallmark of model-assisted designs: simplicity-the dose escalation/de-escalation rule can be tabulated prior to the trial conduct. Extensive simulation studies show that the proposed method can effectively incorporate prior information to improve the operating characteristics of model-assisted designs, similarly to model-based designs.

摘要

将历史数据纳入其中具有提高 I 期临床试验效率和加速药物开发的巨大潜力。对于基于模型的设计,例如连续评估方法 (CRM),这可以通过指定“骨架”来方便地进行,即每个剂量的剂量限制毒性 (DLT) 概率的先验估计。相比之下,很少有工作将历史数据纳入模型辅助设计,例如贝叶斯最佳区间 (BOIN)、键盘和修改的毒性概率区间 (mTPI) 设计。这导致了一种误解,即模型辅助设计不能纳入先验信息。在本文中,我们提出了一个统一的框架,允许将历史数据纳入模型辅助设计。所提出的方法使用了成熟的“骨架”方法,结合了先验有效样本量的概念,因此易于理解和使用。更重要的是,我们的方法保持了模型辅助设计的标志:简单性-剂量递增/递减规则可以在试验进行之前制表。广泛的模拟研究表明,所提出的方法可以有效地纳入先验信息,以提高模型辅助设计的操作特性,类似于基于模型的设计。

相似文献

1
Incorporating historical information to improve phase I clinical trials.将历史信息纳入以改善 I 期临床试验。
Pharm Stat. 2021 Nov;20(6):1017-1034. doi: 10.1002/pst.2121. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
2
The 3 + 3 design in dose-finding studies with small sample sizes: Pitfalls and possible remedies.在样本量较小的剂量发现研究中使用 3+3 设计:陷阱及可能的补救措施。
Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;21(3):350-357. doi: 10.1177/17407745241240401. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
3
On the relative efficiency of model-assisted designs: a conditional approach.论模型辅助设计的相对效率:一种条件方法。
J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(4):648-662. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1632881. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
4
Accuracy, Safety, and Reliability of Novel Phase I Trial Designs.新型 I 期临床试验设计的准确性、安全性和可靠性。
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Sep 15;24(18):4357-4364. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0168. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
5
An extended Bayesian semi-mechanistic dose-finding design for phase I oncology trials using pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information.一种用于I期肿瘤试验的扩展贝叶斯半机制剂量探索设计,该设计利用药代动力学和药效学信息
Stat Med. 2024 Feb 20;43(4):689-705. doi: 10.1002/sim.9980. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
6
Multi-stage dose expansion cohort (MSDEC) design with Bayesian stopping rule.多阶段剂量扩展队列(MSDEC)设计与贝叶斯停止规则。
J Biopharm Stat. 2022 Jul 4;32(4):600-612. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2022.2080694. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
7
Borrowing historical information to improve phase I clinical trials using meta-analytic-predictive priors.借鉴历史信息,利用荟萃分析预测先验来改进I期临床试验。
J Biopharm Stat. 2022 Jan 2;32(1):34-52. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2022.2058526. Epub 2022 May 20.
8
Incorporating historical information to improve dose optimization design with toxicity and efficacy endpoints: iBOIN-ET.纳入历史信息以改善基于毒性和疗效终点的剂量优化设计:iBOIN-ET。
Pharm Stat. 2023 May-Jun;22(3):440-460. doi: 10.1002/pst.2281. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
9
Comparative review of novel model-assisted designs for phase I clinical trials.新型模型辅助设计在 I 期临床试验中的比较综述。
Stat Med. 2018 Jun 30;37(14):2208-2222. doi: 10.1002/sim.7674. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
10
Performance of phase-I dose finding designs with and without a run-in intra-patient dose escalation stage.有和没有患者内剂量递增导入阶段的I期剂量探索设计的性能。
Pharm Stat. 2023 Mar;22(2):236-247. doi: 10.1002/pst.2268. Epub 2022 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of model-free phase I dose escalation designs for dual-agent combination therapies.双药联合疗法的非模型I期剂量递增设计比较
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Feb;33(2):203-226. doi: 10.1177/09622802231220497. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
2
Optimizing dose-schedule regimens with bayesian adaptive designs: opportunities and challenges.利用贝叶斯适应性设计优化剂量-给药方案:机遇与挑战
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Nov 23;14:1261312. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1261312. eCollection 2023.
3
A dose-finding design for phase I clinical trials based on Bayesian stochastic approximation.
基于贝叶斯随机逼近的 I 期临床试验剂量发现设计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Oct 1;22(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01741-3.
4
A comparative study of Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design with interval 3+3 (i3+3) design for phase I oncology dose-finding trials.一项针对I期肿瘤剂量探索试验,比较贝叶斯最优区间(BOIN)设计与3+3区间(i3+3)设计的研究。
Stat Biopharm Res. 2021;13(2):147-155. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2020.1811147. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
5
BOIN Suite: A Software Platform to Design and Implement Novel Early-Phase Clinical Trials.BOIN 套件:用于设计和实施新型早期临床试验的软件平台。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 Jan;5:91-101. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00122.