• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多阶段剂量扩展队列(MSDEC)设计与贝叶斯停止规则。

Multi-stage dose expansion cohort (MSDEC) design with Bayesian stopping rule.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.

出版信息

J Biopharm Stat. 2022 Jul 4;32(4):600-612. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2022.2080694. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1080/10543406.2022.2080694
PMID:35699319
Abstract

Phase I trial designs generally fall into three categories: algorithm-based (e.g., the classic 3 + 3 design), model-based (e.g., the continual reassessment method, CRM), and model-assisted designs that combine features of the first two (e.g., the Bayesian Optimal Interval, BOIN, design). The classic '3 + 3' design continues to be the most frequently used design in phase I trials in finding maximum tolerated dose (MTD) due to its simplicity and feasibility, though many other model-based designs such as the Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) have also been proposed and used in various such as immunotherapies trials. The MTD based on three or six patients is not accurate, and dose-expansion cohorts (DEC) are increasingly used to better characterize the toxicity profiles of experimental agents. This article proposes a multi-stage dose-expansion cohort (MSDEC) hybrid frequentist-Bayesian design combining the power prior and the sequential conditional probability ratio test. In this design, results from the dose-escalation part are viewed and treated as historical data, and then are weighted and modeled through power prior. For safety monitoring, the Bayesian stopping rule is developed and the maximum sample size is calculated by a fixed-sample-size test with exact binomial computation. Simulation studies showed that MSDEC reduces the chance that a patient experiences a toxic dose. Power prior provides a reasonable prior for the Bayesian model because the degree of informativeness of the prior can be driven by the ("objective") historical data rather than from expert opinion elicited on parameters in the model.

摘要

I 期临床试验设计通常分为三类:基于算法的(例如经典的 3+3 设计)、基于模型的(例如连续评估方法,CRM),以及结合前两种设计特点的基于模型的设计(例如贝叶斯最优区间,BOIN 设计)。由于其简单性和可行性,经典的“3+3”设计仍然是 I 期临床试验中寻找最大耐受剂量(MTD)时最常使用的设计,尽管许多其他基于模型的设计,如连续评估方法(CRM),也已被提出并应用于各种免疫疗法试验中。基于三或六名患者的 MTD 并不准确,扩展剂量队列(DEC)越来越多地被用于更好地描述实验性药物的毒性特征。本文提出了一种结合功效先验和序贯条件概率比检验的多阶段扩展剂量队列(MSDEC)混合频率派-贝叶斯设计。在该设计中,剂量递增部分的结果被视为历史数据进行观察和处理,然后通过功效先验进行加权和建模。为了进行安全性监测,开发了贝叶斯停止规则,并通过具有精确二项式计算的固定样本量检验计算最大样本量。模拟研究表明,MSDEC 降低了患者接受毒性剂量的机会。功效先验为贝叶斯模型提供了一个合理的先验,因为先验的信息量可以由(“客观”)历史数据驱动,而不是由模型中参数的专家意见驱动。

相似文献

1
Multi-stage dose expansion cohort (MSDEC) design with Bayesian stopping rule.多阶段剂量扩展队列(MSDEC)设计与贝叶斯停止规则。
J Biopharm Stat. 2022 Jul 4;32(4):600-612. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2022.2080694. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
2
The 3 + 3 design in dose-finding studies with small sample sizes: Pitfalls and possible remedies.在样本量较小的剂量发现研究中使用 3+3 设计:陷阱及可能的补救措施。
Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;21(3):350-357. doi: 10.1177/17407745241240401. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
3
A new pragmatic design for dose escalation in phase 1 clinical trials using an adaptive continual reassessment method.一种新的实用设计,用于使用适应性连续评估方法在 I 期临床试验中进行剂量递增。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jun 26;19(1):632. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5801-3.
4
Incorporating historical information to improve phase I clinical trials.将历史信息纳入以改善 I 期临床试验。
Pharm Stat. 2021 Nov;20(6):1017-1034. doi: 10.1002/pst.2121. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
5
The continual reassessment method and its applications: a Bayesian methodology for phase I cancer clinical trials.连续重新评估法及其应用:一种用于I期癌症临床试验的贝叶斯方法
Stat Med. 2001;20(17-18):2661-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.735.
6
Assessment of various continual reassessment method models for dose-escalation phase 1 oncology clinical trials: using real clinical data and simulation studies.评估肿瘤 1 期临床试验剂量递增阶段的各种连续再评估方法模型:使用真实临床数据和模拟研究。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jan 5;21(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07703-6.
7
Performance of phase-I dose finding designs with and without a run-in intra-patient dose escalation stage.有和没有患者内剂量递增导入阶段的I期剂量探索设计的性能。
Pharm Stat. 2023 Mar;22(2):236-247. doi: 10.1002/pst.2268. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
8
Borrowing historical information to improve phase I clinical trials using meta-analytic-predictive priors.借鉴历史信息,利用荟萃分析预测先验来改进I期临床试验。
J Biopharm Stat. 2022 Jan 2;32(1):34-52. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2022.2058526. Epub 2022 May 20.
9
Performance of toxicity probability interval based designs in contrast to the continual reassessment method.基于毒性概率区间的设计与连续重新评估方法的性能对比。
Stat Med. 2017 Jan 30;36(2):291-300. doi: 10.1002/sim.7043. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
10
Accuracy, Safety, and Reliability of Novel Phase I Trial Designs.新型 I 期临床试验设计的准确性、安全性和可靠性。
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Sep 15;24(18):4357-4364. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0168. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
TODO: A Triple-Outcome Double-Criterion Optimal Design for Dose Monitoring-and-Optimization in Multi-Dose Randomized Trials.待办事项:多剂量随机试验中剂量监测与优化的三结果双标准最优设计。
Stat Med. 2025 May;44(10-12):e70090. doi: 10.1002/sim.70090.