Rothermich Kathrin, Schoen Simmons Elizabeth, Rao Makarla Pavitra, Benson Lauren, Plyler Emma, Kim Hana, Henssel Joergensen Gitte
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders.
Department of Communication Disorders.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2021 Jun;75(2):211-220. doi: 10.1037/cep0000223. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
Recognizing sarcasm and jocularity during face-to-face communication requires the integration of verbal, paralinguistic, and nonverbal cues, yet most previous research on nonliteral language processing has been carried out using written or static stimuli. In the current study, we examined the processing of dynamic literal and nonliteral intentions using eye tracking. Participants ( = 37) viewed short, ecologically valid video vignettes and were asked to identify the speakers' intention. Participants had greater difficulty identifying jocular statements as insincere in comparison to sarcastic statements and spent significantly more time looking at faces during nonliteral versus literal social interactions. Finally, participants took longer to shift their attention from one talker to the other talker during interactions that conveyed literal positive intentions compared with jocular and literal negative intentions. These findings currently support the and the of nonliteral language processing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
在面对面交流中识别讽刺和诙谐需要整合言语、副语言和非言语线索，但之前关于非字面语言处理的大多数研究都是使用书面或静态刺激进行的。在当前的研究中，我们使用眼动追踪技术研究了动态字面和非字面意图的处理过程。参与者（n = 37）观看了简短的、具有生态效度的视频短片，并被要求识别说话者的意图。与讽刺性陈述相比，参与者在将诙谐陈述识别为不真诚时遇到了更大的困难，并且在非字面与字面社交互动中花费了显著更多的时间注视面部。最后，与诙谐和字面负面意图相比，参与者在传达字面积极意图的互动过程中，将注意力从一个说话者转移到另一个说话者所花费的时间更长。这些发现目前支持了非字面语言处理的[具体理论1]和[具体理论2]。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2021美国心理学会，保留所有权利） 。
需注意，原文中“the and the ”部分缺失具体内容，我按格式要求进行了翻译，实际应用中需补充完整准确信息。
