Information and Decision Sciences, University of Minnesota, Carlson School of Management, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
United Family Medicine Residency, Allina Health, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):e0249453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249453. eCollection 2021.
Patient access and adherence to chronic medications is critical. In this work, we evaluate whether disruptions related to Covid-19 have affected new and existing patients' access to pharmacological therapies without interruption. We do so by performing a retrospective analysis on a dataset of 9.4 billion US prescription drug claims from 252 million patients from May, 2019 through August, 2020 (about 93% of prescriptions dispensed within those months). Using fixed effect (conditional likelihood) linear models, we evaluate continuity of care, how many days of supply patients received, and the likelihood of discontinuing therapy for drugs from classes with significant population health impacts. Findings indicate that more prescriptions were filled in March 2020 than in any prior month, followed by a significant drop in monthly dispensing. Compared to the pre-Covid era, a patient's likelihood of discontinuing some medications increased after the spread of Covid: norgestrel-ethinyl estradiol (hormonal contraceptive) discontinuation increased 0.62% (95% CI: 0.59% to 0.65%, p<0.001); dexmethylphenidate HCL (ADHD stimulant treatment) discontinuation increased 2.84% (95% CI: 2.79% to 2.89%, p<0.001); escitalopram oxalate (SSRI antidepressant) discontinuation increased 0.57% (95% CI: 0.561% to 0.578%, p<0.001); and haloperidol (antipsychotic) discontinuation increased 1.49% (95% CI: 1.41% to 1.57%, p<0.001). In contrast, the likelihood of discontinuing tacrolimus (immunosuppressant) decreased 0.15% (95% CI: 0.12% to 0.19%, p<0.001). The likelihood of discontinuing buprenorphine/naloxone (opioid addiction therapy) decreased 0.59% (95% CI: 0.55% to 0.62% decrease, p<0.001). We also observe a notable decline in new patients accessing these latter two therapies. Most US patients were able to access chronic medications during the early months of Covid-19, but still were more likely to discontinue their therapies than in previous months. Further, fewer than normal new patients started taking medications that may be vital to their care. Providers would do well to inquire about adherence and provide prompt, nonjudgmental, re-initiation of medications. From a policy perspective, opioid management programs seem to demonstrate a robust ability to manage existing patients in spite of disruption.
患者获得和坚持使用慢性药物至关重要。在这项工作中,我们评估了与新冠疫情相关的中断是否会影响新老患者使用药物治疗的连续性。我们通过对 2019 年 5 月至 2020 年 8 月期间来自 2520 万名患者的 94 亿美国处方药索赔数据进行回顾性分析来实现这一目标(约占这些月份内配药的 93%)。我们使用固定效应(条件似然)线性模型,评估了护理连续性、患者接受的供应天数,以及具有重大人群健康影响的药物类别中断治疗的可能性。结果表明,2020 年 3 月的处方量高于以往任何一个月,随后每月的配药量显著下降。与新冠疫情前相比,新冠疫情传播后,一些药物的患者停药率有所上升:去氧孕烯炔雌醇(避孕药)停药率增加了 0.62%(95%置信区间:0.59%至 0.65%,p<0.001);右苯丙胺氢氯噻嗪(ADHD 兴奋剂治疗)停药率增加了 2.84%(95%置信区间:2.79%至 2.89%,p<0.001);依地普仑草酸盐(SSRIs 抗抑郁药)停药率增加了 0.57%(95%置信区间:0.561%至 0.578%,p<0.001);氟哌啶醇(抗精神病药)停药率增加了 1.49%(95%置信区间:1.41%至 1.57%,p<0.001)。相比之下,他克莫司(免疫抑制剂)的停药率下降了 0.15%(95%置信区间:0.12%至 0.19%,p<0.001)。丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮(阿片类药物成瘾治疗)的停药率下降了 0.59%(95%置信区间:0.55%至 0.62%,p<0.001)。我们还观察到,使用这两种药物的新患者数量明显减少。大多数美国患者在新冠疫情早期能够获得慢性药物,但与之前几个月相比,他们更有可能停止治疗。此外,接受可能对其护理至关重要的药物治疗的新患者人数低于正常水平。提供者最好询问患者的用药依从性,并及时、不评判地重新开始用药。从政策角度来看,尽管存在中断,阿片类药物管理项目似乎仍具有管理现有患者的强大能力。