UMass Memorial Medical Center, Cardiovascular Medicine, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01655 USA.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2021 Apr;33(4):E263-E268. doi: 10.25270/jic/20.00455.
Antiplatelet therapy is paramount to reduce the risk of coronary stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Newer agents are reliable and have a fast onset of action, but have significantly higher cost, leading to compliance concerns. We adopted and evaluated an acute agent-switching strategy, using prasugrel or ticagrelor for rapid and reliable periprocedural antiplatelet action, followed by a switch to generic clopidogrel.
This large, single-center study included all patients who underwent PCI between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016. Study endpoints were 30- day mortality and bleeding events.
A total of 5007 patients met inclusion criteria. Average age was 63.5 ± 12.5 years. Prior to PCI, 54.8% of patients were preloaded with ticagrelor, 8.5% with prasugrel, and 36.7% with clopidogreI. The majority of patients (93%) loaded with ticagrelor and more than half (58%) of those loaded with prasugrel were subsequently switched prior to hospital discharge to clopidogrel for long-term therapy. Patients pretreated with ticagrelor or prasugrel and switched to clopidogrel had overall lowest bleeding rates (0.9% and 0.8%, respectively). The highest rates of bleeding were noted in patients maintained on ticagrelor or clopidogrel throughout (2.5% and 1.7%, respectively). After accounting for additional periprocedural use of intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, the lowest bleeding rates were observed in patients loaded with ticagrelor and switched to clopidogrel (0.75%), with the highest bleeding observed in patients maintained on ticagrelor throughout. There were no events of acute stent thrombosis.
A strategy of using newer, fast-acting, and reliable antiplatelet agents prior to PCI and acutely switching to long-term clopidogrel therapy appears safe and efficacious. Although the superiority of the newer antiplatelet agents for long-term post-PCI dual-antiplatelet therapy in a trial setting is well established, the impact of increased adherence to lower-cost clopidogrel therapy in the real-world setting merits further consideration.
在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后,抗血小板治疗对于降低冠状动脉支架血栓形成的风险至关重要。新型药物可靠且起效迅速,但成本显著增加,导致用药依从性受到关注。我们采用并评估了一种急性药物转换策略,在 PCI 前使用普拉格雷或替格瑞洛进行快速可靠的围手术期抗血小板治疗,然后转换为常规氯吡格雷。
这项大型单中心研究纳入了 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间接受 PCI 的所有患者。研究终点为 30 天死亡率和出血事件。
共有 5007 例患者符合纳入标准。平均年龄为 63.5±12.5 岁。在 PCI 之前,54.8%的患者负荷量使用替格瑞洛,8.5%使用普拉格雷,36.7%使用氯吡格雷。大多数患者(93%)负荷量使用替格瑞洛,超过一半(58%)负荷量使用普拉格雷的患者在出院前转换为氯吡格雷进行长期治疗。预处理使用替格瑞洛或普拉格雷并转换为氯吡格雷的患者总体出血率最低(分别为 0.9%和 0.8%)。全程使用替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷的患者出血发生率最高(分别为 2.5%和 1.7%)。在考虑到围手术期额外使用静脉注射糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂后,负荷量使用替格瑞洛并转换为氯吡格雷的患者出血率最低(0.75%),全程使用替格瑞洛的患者出血发生率最高。无急性支架血栓形成事件。
在 PCI 前使用新型、起效迅速且可靠的抗血小板药物,并在急性期转换为长期氯吡格雷治疗的策略似乎是安全有效的。虽然新型抗血小板药物在试验环境下用于长期 PCI 后双联抗血小板治疗的优越性已得到充分证实,但在真实世界环境下增加对成本更低的氯吡格雷治疗的依从性的影响值得进一步考虑。