Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, 851 University Blvd. SE, Suite 101, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive (0812), La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093-0812, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;21(1):636. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10616-z.
American Indian elders, aged 55 years and older, represent a neglected segment of the United States (U.S.) health care system. This group is more likely to be uninsured and to suffer from greater morbidities, poorer health outcomes and quality of life, and lower life expectancies compared to all other aging populations in the country. Despite the U.S. government's federal trust responsibility to meet American Indians' health-related needs through the Indian Health Service (IHS), elders are negatively affected by provider shortages, limited availability of health care services, and gaps in insurance. This qualitative study examines the perspectives of professional stakeholders involved in planning, delivery of, and advocating for services for this population to identify and analyze macro- and meso-level factors affecting access to and use of health care and insurance among American Indian elders at the micro level.
Between June 2016 and March 2017, we undertook in-depth qualitative interviews with 47 professional stakeholders in two states in the Southwest U.S., including health care providers, outreach workers, public-sector administrators, and tribal leaders. The interviews focused on perceptions of both policy- and practice-related factors that bear upon health care inequities impacting elders. We analyzed iteratively the interview transcripts, using both open and focused coding techniques, followed by a critical review of the findings by a Community Action Board comprising American Indian elders.
Findings illuminated complex and multilevel contextual influences on health care inequities for elders, centering on (1) gaps in elder-oriented services; (2) benefits and limits of the Affordable Care Act (ACA); (2) invisibility of elders in national, state, and tribal policymaking; and (4) perceived threats to the IHS system and the federal trust responsibility.
Findings point to recommendations to improve the prevention and treatment of illness among American Indian elders by meeting their unique health care and insurance needs. Policies and practices must target meso and macro levels of contextual influence. Although Medicaid expansion under the ACA enables providers of essential services to elders, including the IHS, to enhance care through increased reimbursements, future policy efforts must improve upon this funding situation and fulfill the federal trust responsibility.
55 岁及以上的美国印第安老年人是美国(美国)医疗保健系统中被忽视的一部分。与该国所有其他老年人群体相比,这一群体更有可能没有保险,并且更容易出现更多的发病率、较差的健康结果和生活质量,以及更低的预期寿命。尽管美国政府通过印第安人健康服务局(IHS)承担着满足美国印第安人健康相关需求的联邦信托责任,但由于服务提供者短缺、医疗服务有限以及保险方面存在差距,老年人受到了负面影响。这项定性研究考察了参与规划、提供和倡导为这一人群提供服务的专业利益相关者的观点,以确定和分析影响微观层面美国印第安老年人获得和使用医疗保健和保险的宏观和中观层面因素。
在 2016 年 6 月至 2017 年 3 月期间,我们在美国西南部的两个州对 47 名专业利益相关者进行了深入的定性访谈,包括医疗保健提供者、外展工作者、公共部门管理人员和部落领袖。这些访谈重点关注影响老年人的医疗保健不平等的政策和实践相关因素的看法。我们使用开放式和聚焦式编码技术对访谈记录进行了迭代分析,然后由一个由美国印第安老年人组成的社区行动委员会对调查结果进行了批判性审查。
研究结果揭示了影响老年人医疗保健不平等的复杂和多层次的背景影响,重点是:(1)面向老年人的服务差距;(2)《平价医疗法案》(ACA)的优势和局限性;(2)老年人在国家、州和部落决策中的无形性;(4)对 IHS 系统和联邦信托责任的感知威胁。
研究结果表明,通过满足美国印第安老年人独特的医疗保健和保险需求,改善美国印第安老年人的疾病预防和治疗建议。政策和实践必须针对中观和宏观层面的背景影响。尽管《平价医疗法案》下的医疗补助扩大使包括 IHS 在内的为老年人提供基本服务的提供者能够通过增加报销来加强护理,但未来的政策努力必须改善这种资金状况,并履行联邦信托责任。