• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

降低单侧乳腺癌中平均风险女性的对侧预防性乳房切除术率。

Decreasing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates in average-risk women with unilateral breast cancer.

机构信息

Providence Breast Centre, Mount Saint Joseph Hospital, 3080 Prince Edward Street, Vancouver, BC V5T 3N4, Canada; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2021 Jun;221(6):1172-1176. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.040. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.040
PMID:33795126
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) is not recommended for average-risk women with breast cancer due to lack of evidence for survival benefit, yet recent studies demonstrate increasing CPM rates.

METHODS

We identified patients with breast cancer treated with unilateral mastectomy (UM) with or without CPM. Rates of malignancy in CPM specimens and factors in CPM rates were assessed.

RESULTS

From 2013 to 2017, 1353 patients had UM and 355 had CPM. Our institution's occult malignancy detection rate was 5.04%. CPM rates decreased from 31.6% to 17.3% (p < 0.001) over 5 years. Compared to patients receiving UM only, patients receiving CPMs had significantly higher reconstruction rates (p < 0.001), which did not significantly change over time (p = 0.551) and tended to be younger (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients having UM have low risk of contralateral malignancy. CPM is associated with younger age and breast reconstruction, suggesting factors to identify for patient and provider education.

摘要

背景

由于缺乏生存获益的证据,不建议将对侧预防性乳房切除术 (CPM) 用于乳腺癌的低危女性,但最近的研究表明 CPM 率不断增加。

方法

我们确定了接受单侧乳房切除术 (UM) 治疗且伴或不伴 CPM 的乳腺癌患者。评估 CPM 标本中恶性肿瘤的发生率和 CPM 率的影响因素。

结果

2013 年至 2017 年,1353 例患者接受 UM,355 例患者接受 CPM。我们机构的隐匿性恶性肿瘤检出率为 5.04%。5 年内,CPM 率从 31.6%降至 17.3%(p<0.001)。与仅接受 UM 的患者相比,接受 CPM 的患者的重建率明显更高(p<0.001),但随着时间的推移并没有显著变化(p=0.551),且往往更年轻(p<0.001)。

结论

接受 UM 的患者发生对侧恶性肿瘤的风险较低。CPM 与年龄较小和乳房重建有关,提示需要识别这些因素,以便对患者和医务人员进行教育。

相似文献

1
Decreasing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates in average-risk women with unilateral breast cancer.降低单侧乳腺癌中平均风险女性的对侧预防性乳房切除术率。
Am J Surg. 2021 Jun;221(6):1172-1176. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.040. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
2
The financial impact and drivers of hospital charges in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and reconstruction: a Nationwide Inpatient Sample hospital analysis.对侧预防性乳房切除术和重建术中医院收费的财务影响及驱动因素:一项全国住院患者样本医院分析
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Sep;165(2):301-310. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4315-4. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
3
State Variation in the Receipt of a Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Among Women Who Received a Diagnosis of Invasive Unilateral Early-Stage Breast Cancer in the United States, 2004-2012.美国 2004-2012 年间接受单侧浸润性早期乳腺癌诊断的女性中,接受对侧预防性乳房切除术的情况存在州际差异。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jul 1;152(7):648-657. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0115.
4
Are There Disparities in Breast Reconstruction After Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy?对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)后的乳房重建是否存在差异?
J Surg Res. 2024 Jun;298:277-290. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.03.010. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
5
Active Participation in Decision-Making in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy for Patients With Breast Cancer.主动参与乳腺癌患者对侧预防性乳房切除术的决策。
J Surg Res. 2019 Oct;242:129-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.037. Epub 2019 May 7.
6
Growing Use of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Despite no Improvement in Long-term Survival for Invasive Breast Cancer.对侧预防性乳房切除术的使用日益增加,尽管对浸润性乳腺癌的长期生存并无改善。
Ann Surg. 2017 Mar;265(3):581-589. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001698.
7
Assessing the Effect of Lifetime Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk on the Selection of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy for Unilateral Breast Cancer.评估终生对侧乳腺癌风险对单侧乳腺癌患者选择对侧预防性乳房切除术的影响。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Apr;18(2):e205-e218. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
8
Differences between Breast Conservation-Eligible Patients and Unilateral Mastectomy Patients in Choosing Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomies.符合保乳条件的患者与接受单侧乳房切除术的患者在选择对侧预防性乳房切除术方面的差异。
Breast J. 2016 Nov;22(6):607-615. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12648. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
9
Predictors of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and the impact on breast reconstruction.对侧预防性乳房切除术的预测因素及其对乳房重建的影响。
Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72(6):S153-7. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000099.
10
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Compared to Unilateral Mastectomy with Routine Surveillance for Unilateral, Sporadic Breast Cancer.对比单侧乳腺癌常规监测的单侧预防性乳房切除术与对侧乳房切除术的成本效益分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec;24(13):3903-3910. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6094-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Oncoplastic Breast Reconstruction Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes.肿瘤整形乳房重建的并发症及患者报告的结局
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2025 Jun 30:22925503251350906. doi: 10.1177/22925503251350906.
2
Exploring the role of germline genetic testing in surgical decision making for early-stage invasive breast cancer: insights from a safety-net hospital.探索生殖系基因检测在早期浸润性乳腺癌手术决策中的作用:来自一家安全网医院的见解。
J Community Genet. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00806-2.
3
De-Escalating Breast Cancer Surgery: Should We Apply Quality Indicators from Other Jurisdictions in Canada?
降阶式乳腺癌手术:我们是否应该在加拿大采用其他司法管辖区的质量指标?
Curr Oncol. 2021 Dec 29;29(1):144-154. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29010013.