• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
State Variation in the Receipt of a Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Among Women Who Received a Diagnosis of Invasive Unilateral Early-Stage Breast Cancer in the United States, 2004-2012.美国 2004-2012 年间接受单侧浸润性早期乳腺癌诊断的女性中,接受对侧预防性乳房切除术的情况存在州际差异。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jul 1;152(7):648-657. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0115.
2
Growing Use of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Despite no Improvement in Long-term Survival for Invasive Breast Cancer.对侧预防性乳房切除术的使用日益增加,尽管对浸润性乳腺癌的长期生存并无改善。
Ann Surg. 2017 Mar;265(3):581-589. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001698.
3
Impact of breast reconstruction on the decision to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.乳房重建对接受对侧预防性乳房切除术决策的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;21(9):2934-40. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3712-8. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
4
Trends in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Other Types of Breast Cancer Surgery, South Carolina, 2005-2013.2005 - 2013年南卡罗来纳州对侧预防性乳房切除术及其他类型乳腺癌手术的趋势
J Registry Manag. 2018 Spring;45(1):28-32.
5
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy provides no survival benefit in young women with estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer.对侧预防性乳房切除术对雌激素受体阴性的年轻乳腺癌女性患者并无生存获益。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Oct;21(10):3231-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3956-3. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
6
Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer.全国范围内早期乳腺癌乳房切除术的趋势。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Jan;150(1):9-16. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2895.
7
Assessing the Effect of Lifetime Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk on the Selection of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy for Unilateral Breast Cancer.评估终生对侧乳腺癌风险对单侧乳腺癌患者选择对侧预防性乳房切除术的影响。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Apr;18(2):e205-e218. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
8
Mastectomy patterns, but not rates, are changing in the treatment of early breast cancer. Experience of a single European institution on 2315 consecutive patients.保乳手术模式而非比率在早期乳腺癌的治疗中正在发生变化。一家欧洲单机构 2315 例连续患者的经验。
Breast. 2018 Jun;39:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
9
The use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among elderly patients in the United States.美国老年患者对预防性对侧乳房切除术的应用。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Aug;177(1):175-183. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05288-8. Epub 2019 May 28.
10
Changing surgical trends in young patients with early stage breast cancer, 2003 to 2010: a report from the National Cancer Data Base.2003 年至 2010 年轻乳腺癌患者外科治疗趋势的变化:来自国家癌症数据库的报告。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Jul;219(1):19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.043. Epub 2014 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Immediate 2-Stage breast reconstruction outcomes after proton or photon postmastectomy radiotherapy.质子或光子乳房切除术后放疗后的即刻两阶段乳房重建结果。
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2025 Jul 13;54:101015. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.101015. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Establishment and validation survival prediction models for T1 locally advanced breast cancer after breast conservation surgery versus mastectomy.保乳手术与乳房切除术治疗T1期局部晚期乳腺癌的生存预测模型的建立与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 9;15(1):12189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91205-7.
3
Risk of second primary cancer in young breast cancer survivors: an important yet overlooked issue.年轻乳腺癌幸存者发生第二原发性癌症的风险:一个重要却被忽视的问题。
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025 Feb 24;17:17588359251321904. doi: 10.1177/17588359251321904. eCollection 2025.
4
Epidemiology and prognostic nomogram for invasive breast cancer aged 85 years and older in the USA.美国 85 岁及以上浸润性乳腺癌的流行病学和预后列线图。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 30;14(1):17608. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67527-3.
5
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in a rural population: A single-institution experience.农村人口的对侧预防性乳房切除术:单机构经验
Surg Open Sci. 2024 Feb 23;18:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.02.007. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Society of Surgical Oncology Breast Disease Site Working Group Statement on Contralateral Mastectomy: Indications, Outcomes, and Risks.外科肿瘤学会乳房疾病部位工作组关于对侧乳房切除术的声明:适应证、结果和风险。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Apr;31(4):2212-2223. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-14893-x. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
7
Effect of rurality and travel distance on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer.农村环境和交通距离对单侧乳腺癌患者行预防性对侧乳房切除术的影响。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Dec;34(Suppl 1):171-186. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01689-9. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
8
Decision-making experiences of breast cancer patients related to contralateral prophylactic mastectomy-a systematic meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.乳腺癌患者对侧预防性乳房切除术的决策经历——定性研究的系统元综合分析
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Mar 15;31(4):214. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07674-x.
9
Does a brief surgeon training in negotiation theory principles decrease rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy?简短的外科医生谈判理论原则培训是否会降低预防性对侧乳房切除术的比率?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 May;199(1):119-126. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06891-6. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
10
Survival Outcomes in Women with Unilateral, Triple-Negative, Breast Cancer Correlated with Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy.单侧、三阴性乳腺癌女性的生存结局与对侧预防性乳房切除术相关。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug;30(8):4648-4656. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-13056-0. Epub 2023 Jan 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Consensus Statement from the American Society of Breast Surgeons: Additional Considerations and a Framework for Shared Decision Making.美国乳腺外科医师协会对侧预防性乳房切除术共识声明:更多考量及共同决策框架
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(10):3106-11. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5408-8. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
2
Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy (CPM) Consensus Statement from the American Society of Breast Surgeons: Data on CPM Outcomes and Risks.美国乳腺外科医师协会关于对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)的共识声明:CPM的结果与风险数据
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(10):3100-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5443-5. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
3
Breast Conservation Therapy Versus Mastectomy: Shared Decision-Making Strategies and Overcoming Decisional Conflicts in Your Patients.保乳治疗与乳房切除术:共同决策策略及解决患者的决策冲突
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(10):3133-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5369-y. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
4
BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Testing in Young Women With Breast Cancer.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因突变检测在年轻乳腺癌女性中的应用。
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jun 1;2(6):730-6. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.5941.
5
Predictors for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in breast cancer patients.乳腺癌患者对侧预防性乳房切除术的预测因素。
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015 Apr 1;8(4):3748-64. eCollection 2015.
6
Local Therapy Decision-Making and Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Young Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.早期乳腺癌年轻女性的局部治疗决策与对侧预防性乳房切除术
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;22(12):3809-15. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4572-6. Epub 2015 May 1.
7
Factors associated with contralateral preventive mastectomy.与对侧预防性乳房切除术相关的因素。
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2015 Jan 7;7:1-8. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S72737. eCollection 2015.
8
Cancer statistics, 2015.癌症统计数据,2015 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):5-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
9
Evaluation of North American Association of Central Cancer Registries' (NAACCR) data for use in population-based cancer survival studies.评估北美中央癌症登记协会(NAACCR)的数据在基于人群的癌症生存研究中的应用。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2014 Nov;2014(49):198-209. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgu018.
10
Implementing and evaluating shared decision making in oncology practice.在肿瘤学实践中实施和评估共享决策。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Nov-Dec;64(6):377-88. doi: 10.3322/caac.21245. Epub 2014 Sep 8.

美国 2004-2012 年间接受单侧浸润性早期乳腺癌诊断的女性中,接受对侧预防性乳房切除术的情况存在州际差异。

State Variation in the Receipt of a Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Among Women Who Received a Diagnosis of Invasive Unilateral Early-Stage Breast Cancer in the United States, 2004-2012.

机构信息

Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2017 Jul 1;152(7):648-657. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0115.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0115
PMID:28355431
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5831458/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomies (CPMs) among patients with invasive unilateral breast cancer has increased substantially during the past decade in the United States despite the lack of evidence for survival benefit. However, whether this trend varies by state or whether it is correlated with changes in proportions of reconstructive surgery among these patients is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To determine state variation in the temporal trend and in the proportion of CPMs among women with early-stage unilateral breast cancer treated with surgery.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort study of 1.2 million women 20 years of age or older diagnosed with invasive unilateral early-stage breast cancer and treated with surgery from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2012, in 45 states and the District of Columbia as compiled by the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Data analysis was performed from August 1, 2015, to August 31, 2016.

EXPOSURE

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Temporal changes in the proportion of CPMs among women with early-stage unilateral breast cancer treated with surgery by age and state, overall and in relation to changes in the proportions of those who underwent reconstructive surgery.

RESULTS

Among the 1 224 947 women with early-stage breast cancer treated with surgery, the proportion who underwent a CPM nationally increased between 2004 and 2012 from 3.6% (4013 of 113 001) to 10.4% (12 890 of 124 231) for those 45 years or older and from 10.5% (1879 of 17 862) to 33.3% (5237 of 15 745) for those aged 20 to 44 years. The increase was evident in all states, although the magnitude of the increase varied substantially across states. For example, among women 20 to 44 years of age, the proportion who underwent a CPM from 2004-2006 to 2010-2012 increased from 14.9% (317 of 2121) to 24.8% (436 of 1755) (prevalence ratio [PR], 1.66; 95% CI, 1.46-1.89) in New Jersey compared with an increase from 9.8% (162 of 1657) to 32.2% (495 of 1538) (PR, 3.29; 95% CI, 2.80-3.88) in Virginia. In this age group, CPM proportions for the period from 2010 to 2012 were over 42% in the contiguous states of Nebraska, Missouri, Colorado, Iowa, and South Dakota. From 2004 to 2012, the proportion of reconstructive surgical procedures among women aged 20 to 44 years who were diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer and received a CPM increased in many states; however, it did not correlate with the proportion of women who received a CPM.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The increase in the proportion of CPMs among women with early-stage unilateral breast cancer treated with surgery varied substantially across states. Notably, in 5 contiguous Midwest states, nearly half of young women with invasive early-stage breast cancer underwent a CPM from 2010 to 2012. Future studies should examine the reasons for the geographic variation and increasing trend in the use of CPMs.

摘要

重要性:尽管没有生存获益的证据,但在美国,过去十年间接受单侧浸润性乳腺癌治疗的患者中,预防性对侧乳房切除术(CPM)的使用大幅增加。然而,这种趋势是否因州而异,或者它是否与这些患者中重建手术比例的变化相关,目前尚不清楚。

目的:确定 CPM 在接受手术治疗的早期单侧乳腺癌女性中的时间趋势和比例的州际差异。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 120 万名 20 岁或以上、经手术治疗的单侧早期浸润性乳腺癌患者,数据来自北美中央癌症登记协会汇编的 45 个州和哥伦比亚特区的癌症登记数据。数据于 2015 年 8 月 1 日至 2016 年 8 月 31 日进行分析。

暴露因素:CPM。

主要结果和措施:按年龄和州划分,接受手术治疗的早期单侧乳腺癌女性中 CPM 的比例随时间的变化,以及与接受重建手术的女性比例变化的关系。

结果:在接受手术治疗的 1224947 名早期乳腺癌女性中,45 岁及以上患者中 CPM 的比例从 2004 年的 3.6%(4013/113001)增加到 2012 年的 10.4%(12890/124231),20 至 44 岁患者中 CPM 的比例从 10.5%(17862/17862)增加到 33.3%(5237/15745)。所有州都出现了这种增加,但各州之间的增加幅度差异很大。例如,在 20 至 44 岁的女性中,2004-2006 年至 2010-2012 年期间接受 CPM 的比例从 14.9%(317/2121)增加到 24.8%(436/1755)(患病率比[PR],1.66;95%CI,1.46-1.89),而在弗吉尼亚州,这一比例从 9.8%(162/1657)增加到 32.2%(495/1538)(PR,3.29;95%CI,2.80-3.88)。在这个年龄组中,内布拉斯加州、密苏里州、科罗拉多州、爱荷华州和南达科他州连续各州 2010-2012 年 CPM 比例超过 42%。2004 年至 2012 年,接受 CPM 的 20 至 44 岁女性中接受重建手术的比例在许多州增加;然而,这与接受 CPM 的女性比例没有相关性。

结论和相关性:接受手术治疗的早期单侧乳腺癌女性中 CPM 比例的增加在各州之间差异很大。值得注意的是,在 5 个毗邻的中西部州,近一半的年轻女性在 2010 年至 2012 年间接受了 CPM。未来的研究应该探讨 CPM 使用的地理差异和增加趋势的原因。