Diagnostic accuracy of the short-form Fonseca Anamnestic Index in relation to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Screening for temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) is important in research and clinical practice. The short-form Fonseca Anamnestic Index (SFAI) was recently introduced but had only been validated for muscle disorders.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this clinical study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the SFAI and its discrete and pooled items in relation to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) benchmark.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 866 consecutive participants with TMDs and 57 TMD-free controls (aged ≥18 years) were recruited. The participants (n=923; mean age 32.8 ±13.3 years; women 79.2%) answered the FAI, and TMD diagnoses were derived based on the DC/TMD protocol and algorithms. The 5-item SFAI, which comprised 2 pain-related and 3 function-related TMD questions, was subsequently acquired and assessed with reference to the DC/TMD diagnoses. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) was used to verify accuracy (area under the curve [AUC]) and the best cutoff points. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios were also examined.

RESULTS

Pain-related (PT) and intra-articular (IT) TMDs were present in 48.3% (446/923) and 82.7% (763/923) of the participants, respectively. The SFAI demonstrated high accuracy for identifying all TMDs, PT, and IT (AUC of 0.97, 0.99, and 0.97, respectively). The best cutoff points were 12.5 for all TMDs/IT and 17.5 for PT. Sensitivity of the SFAI ranged from 90.7% to 97.5% while specificity varied from 93.0% to 96.5%, with the highest values for PT. As positive predictive values (99.4% to 99.5%) were greater than negative ones (41.7% to 83.3%), the SFAI was better at detecting the presence than the absence of TMDs. With reference to PT, the sensitivity, and specificity of the 2 discrete and pooled pain-related questions (questions 3 and 4), extended from 82.3% to 99.3% and 77.2% to 96.5% respectively. With regard to IT diagnoses, sensitivity and specificity ranged from 56.0% to 98.3% and 86.0% to 98.3% for the 3 discrete and pooled function-related items (questions 1, 2, and 5).

CONCLUSIONS

The SFAI presented high degrees of diagnostic accuracy in relation to the DC/TMD and can be used for screening TMDs. SFAI scores between 15 and 50 points should be used to identify the presence of TMDs, with scores ≥20 points specifying possible pain-related TMDs.