• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断标准(DC/TMD)》巴西葡萄牙语版第一轴:跨文化调适、标准效度及信度

Brazilian Portuguese version of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Axis I: Cross-cultural adaptation, criterion validity, and reliability.

作者信息

Antunes da Cunha Taísi, Alstergren Per, Pereira Júnior Francisco José, Gonçalves Daniela Aparecida de Godoi, Chaves Thaís Cristina, Biasotto-Gonzalez Daniela Aparecida

机构信息

Department of Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Scandinavian Center for Orofacial Neurosciences (SCON), Malmö, Sweden; Specialized Pain Rehabilitation, Skane´s University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Malmo University, Faculty of Odontology, Orofacial Pain and Jaw Function, Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

Braz J Phys Ther. 2025 Mar-Apr;29(2):101187. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101187. Epub 2025 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101187
PMID:40058337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11928758/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) is a biaxial instrument used worldwide for TMD assessment.

OBJECTIVE

To translate, cross-culturally adapt, and assess the criterion validity and reliability of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the DC/TMD Axis I.

METHODS

The translation and cross-cultural adaptation of Axis I into Brazilian Portuguese followed the recommendations of the International Network for Orofacial Pain and Related Disorders Methodology. For the formal assessment, 117 Brazilians with TMD completed the translated version of the TMD Pain Screener, the Symptom Questionnaire, and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale for orofacial pain intensity assessment. Subsequently, a standardized clinical examination was performed. Fifty-one participants were examined by two raters for interrater reliability, and 53 participated on a second assessment day for intrarater reliability analyses. TMD Pain Screener criterion validity was assessed through sensitivity, specificity, and ROC curve. Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to analyze reliability for categorical and continuous data, respectively.

RESULTS

The translated version achieved language equivalency. High accuracy was found for the Brazilian Portuguese version of the TMD Pain Screener short form (AUC = 0.95) compared to the long form, as well as high intrarater reliability (ICC 0.88). Moderate to almost perfect reliability was found for painful TMD diagnoses and disc displacement with reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

The Brazilian Portuguese version of the DC/TMD Axis I is valid and reliable for screening painful TMD and for painful DC/TMD diagnoses.

摘要

背景

颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断标准(DC/TMD)是一种在全球范围内用于颞下颌关节紊乱病评估的双轴工具。

目的

翻译、跨文化调适并评估DC/TMD轴I巴西葡萄牙语版本的标准效度和信度。

方法

轴I的巴西葡萄牙语翻译和跨文化调适遵循国际口腔面部疼痛及相关疾病方法网络的建议。对于正式评估,117名患有颞下颌关节紊乱病的巴西人完成了颞下颌关节紊乱病疼痛筛查器、症状问卷的翻译版本以及用于口腔面部疼痛强度评估的数字疼痛评定量表。随后,进行了标准化临床检查。51名参与者由两名评估者进行评估以分析评估者间信度,53名参与者在第二个评估日参与评估以进行评估者内信度分析。通过敏感性、特异性和ROC曲线评估颞下颌关节紊乱病疼痛筛查器的标准效度。分别使用Kappa和组内相关系数(ICC)分析分类数据和连续数据的信度。

结果

翻译版本实现了语言等效性。与长版相比,巴西葡萄牙语版颞下颌关节紊乱病疼痛筛查器简版(AUC = 0.95)具有较高准确性,评估者内信度也较高(ICC 0.88)。对于疼痛性颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断和可复性盘移位,发现了中度至几乎完美的信度。

结论

DC/TMD轴I的巴西葡萄牙语版本对于筛查疼痛性颞下颌关节紊乱病和疼痛性DC/TMD诊断有效且可靠。

相似文献

1
Brazilian Portuguese version of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Axis I: Cross-cultural adaptation, criterion validity, and reliability.《颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断标准(DC/TMD)》巴西葡萄牙语版第一轴:跨文化调适、标准效度及信度
Braz J Phys Ther. 2025 Mar-Apr;29(2):101187. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101187. Epub 2025 Mar 8.
2
Brazilian Portuguese Version of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis II: Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Measurement Properties.颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断标准轴II的巴西葡萄牙语版本:翻译、跨文化调适及测量特性
J Oral Rehabil. 2025 May;52(5):712-721. doi: 10.1111/joor.13921. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
3
Temporomandibular disorders among Brazilian adolescents: reliability and validity of a screening questionnaire.巴西青少年的颞下颌关节紊乱症:一份筛查问卷的信效度
J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Jul-Aug;22(4):314-22. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720130694.
4
Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group†.颞下颌关节紊乱病(DC/TMD)的诊断标准(临床与研究用):国际 RDC/TMD 联合会*和口腔颌面痛特别兴趣小组†的推荐标准。
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014 Winter;28(1):6-27. doi: 10.11607/jop.1151.
5
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and construct validity of the Tampa scale for kinesiophobia for temporomandibular disorders (TSK/TMD-Br) into Brazilian Portuguese.跨文化调适、特鲁姆普关节痛恐惧量表(TSK/TMD-Br)用于评估颞下颌关节紊乱病的可靠性和结构效度的巴西葡萄牙语版本。
J Oral Rehabil. 2017 Jul;44(7):500-510. doi: 10.1111/joor.12515. Epub 2017 May 15.
6
Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD): interexaminer reliability of the Finnish version of Axis I clinical diagnoses.颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断标准(DC/TMD):芬兰版轴 I 临床诊断的检查者间可靠性。
J Oral Rehabil. 2017 Jul;44(7):493-499. doi: 10.1111/joor.12516. Epub 2017 May 6.
7
Evaluating oral health-related quality of life measure for children and preadolescents with temporomandibular disorder.评估患有颞下颌关节紊乱病的儿童和青少年的口腔健康相关生活质量测量。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 May 12;9:32. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-32.
8
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF-PDI/T) for individuals with temporomandibular disorders.跨文化调适、可靠性和有效性的土耳其版颅面部疼痛和残疾量表 (CF-PDI/T) 为颞下颌关节紊乱的个体。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Feb;45(3):523-533. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2028909. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
9
Brazilian Portuguese Version of the Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory: Cross-Cultural Reliability, Internal Consistency, and Construct and Structural Validity.颅面疼痛和残疾量表的巴西葡萄牙语版本:跨文化信度、内部一致性以及构念和结构效度。
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2018;32(4):389-399. doi: 10.11607/ofph.2141.
10
Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders-INfORM recommendations: Comprehensive and short-form adaptations for adolescents.颞下颌关节紊乱病的诊断标准-INfORM 建议:青少年综合和简化适应。
J Oral Rehabil. 2023 Nov;50(11):1167-1180. doi: 10.1111/joor.13488. Epub 2023 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders in the Brazilian population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.巴西人群颞下颌关节紊乱病的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cranio. 2023 Nov 13:1-8. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2023.2276627.
2
Publication performance and trends in temporomandibular disorders research: A bibliometric analysis.颞下颌关节紊乱病研究的发表绩效和趋势:文献计量分析。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Feb;124(1):101273. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.08.016. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
3
Inter-examiner reliability of the Chinese version of Axis I diagnoses of the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders.中文版颞下颌关节紊乱诊断标准轴 I 诊断的跨检查者信度。
Cranio. 2024 Sep;42(5):513-518. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2021.2015087. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of the short-form Fonseca Anamnestic Index in relation to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders.短形式福赛斯病史指数与颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断标准的诊断准确性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Nov;128(5):977-983. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.016. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
5
Prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.颞下颌关节紊乱患病率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Feb;25(2):441-453. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03710-w. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
6
Translation and Adaptation of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders into the Malay Language: Psychometric Evaluation of Contents.将颞下颌关节紊乱诊断标准翻译成马来语:内容的心理计量评估。
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2020;34(4):323-330. doi: 10.11607/ofph.2624.
7
Interexaminer reliability of the German version of the DC/TMD.德式头痛问卷(DC/TMD)德语版的评估者间信度。
J Oral Rehabil. 2021 Jan;48(1):28-34. doi: 10.1111/joor.13054. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
8
International Classification of Orofacial Pain, 1st edition (ICOP).《口面部疼痛国际分类》第1版(ICOP)
Cephalalgia. 2020 Feb;40(2):129-221. doi: 10.1177/0333102419893823.
9
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价指南。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
10
The Mini Mental State Examination: Review of cutoff points adjusted for schooling in a large Southern Brazilian sample.简易精神状态检查表:巴西南部一个大样本中针对受教育程度调整的临界值综述。
Dement Neuropsychol. 2010 Jan-Mar;4(1):35-41. doi: 10.1590/S1980-57642010DN40100006.