Department of Physical Therapy, Program in Exercise Science, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Department of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas; and.
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Jun 1;35(6):1484-1490. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004017.
Ahn, N, Kim, H, Krzyszkowski, J, Roche, S, and Kipp, K. Influence of the bar position on joint-level biomechanics during isometric pulling exercises. J Strength Cond Res 35(6): 1484-1490, 2021-The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the bar position on ankle, knee, and hip net joint moments (NJMs), relative muscular effort (RME), and vertical ground reaction forces (GRFs) during isometric pulling exercises, such as the isometric midthigh pull. Eight female lacrosse athletes performed maximal effort isometric pulls at 3 different bar positions (low: above patella, mid: midthigh, and high: crease of hip) while motion capture and GRF data were recorded. Net joint moments were calculated with inverse dynamics. Relative muscle effort was defined as the ratio between the inverse dynamics NJMs and the maximum theoretical NJMs, which were estimated with regression-based maximum moment-angle models. Peak NJM and RME were compared with 2-way analyses of variance (ANOVA), whereas GRFS were compared with a 1-way ANOVA. Peak vertical GRF were significantly greater in the mid bar position than the high bar position but did not differ between the low and mid bar position. Bar position significantly influenced peak hip and knee NJM and RME. Hip NJM and RME were greatest in the low bar position, whereas knee NJM and RME were greater in the mid bar position. Because hip and knee extensor NJM and RME differed between the low and mid bar positions, but the GRFS did not, the joint-specific contributions to peak isometric pulling forces likely reflected a trade-off between hip dominance and knee dominance in the low and mid bar position, respectively. This information should be considered in the interpretation isometric pulling data and their use in assessing and monitoring maximal force-producing capacity of the lower body.
安恩,N,金,H,克里斯克夫斯基,J,罗氏,S,和基普,K。等长拉绳练习中杠位置对关节力学的影响。《力量与体能研究》35(6):1484-1490,2021-本研究旨在探讨在等长大腿拉等等长拉绳练习中,杠位置对踝关节、膝关节和髋关节净关节力矩(NJMs)、相对肌肉用力(RME)和垂直地面反作用力(GRFs)的影响。8 名女性曲棍球运动员在 3 种不同杠位置(低位:髌骨上方、中位:大腿中部和高位:髋部折痕)下进行最大努力等长拉绳,同时记录运动捕捉和 GRF 数据。净关节力矩通过逆动力学计算。相对肌肉用力定义为逆动力学 NJMs 与最大理论 NJMs 的比值,最大理论 NJMs 是通过基于回归的最大力矩-角度模型估计的。峰值 NJM 和 RME 用 2 因素方差分析(ANOVA)比较,GRFs 用 1 因素 ANOVA 比较。中位杠位置的峰值垂直 GRF 明显大于高位杠位置,但与低位杠位置无差异。杠位置显著影响峰值髋关节和膝关节 NJM 和 RME。低位杠位置髋关节 NJM 和 RME 最大,而中位杠位置膝关节 NJM 和 RME 最大。由于低位和中位杠位置髋关节和膝关节伸肌 NJM 和 RME 不同,但 GRFs 相同,因此峰值等长拉绳力的关节特异性贡献可能反映了低位和中位杠位置髋关节主导和膝关节主导之间的权衡。在解释等长拉绳数据及其用于评估和监测下半身最大力量产生能力时,应考虑这些信息。