Kinesiology Department, California State University, Monterey Bay, Seaside, California.
Center of Excellence for Sport Science and Coach Education, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee.
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Jan;32(1):48-56. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001968.
Beckham, GK, Sato, K, Santana, HAP, Mizuguchi, S, Haff, GG, and Stone, MH. Effect of body position on force production during the isometric midthigh pull. J Strength Cond Res 32(1): 48-56, 2018-Various body positions have been used in the scientific literature when performing the isometric midthigh pull resulting in divergent results. We evaluated force production in the isometric midthigh pull in bent (125° knee and 125° hip angles) and upright (125° knee, 145° hip angle) positions in subjects with (>6 months) and without (<6 months) substantial experience using weightlifting derivatives. A mixed-design ANOVA was used to evaluate the effect of pull position and weightlifting experience on peak force, force at 50, 90, 200, and 250 ms. There were statistically significant main effects for weightlifting experience and pull position for all variables tested, and statistically significant interaction effects for peak force, allometrically scaled peak force, force at 200 ms, and force at 250 ms. Calculated effect sizes were small to large for all variables in subjects with weightlifting experience, and were small to moderate between positions for all variables in subjects without weightlifting experience. A central finding of the study is that the upright body position (125° knee and 145° hip) should be used given that forces generated are highest in that position. Actual joint angles during maximum effort pulling should be measured to ensure body position is close to the position intended.
贝克汉姆,GK,佐藤,K,桑塔纳,HAP,水谷,S,哈夫,GG,斯通,MH。等长大腿中部拉伸时身体姿势对力量产生的影响。J 力量与调节研究 32(1):48-56,2018-各种身体姿势在科学文献中都有被用来进行等长大腿中部拉伸,导致结果不一致。我们评估了在弯曲(125°膝和 125°髋角)和直立(125°膝,145°髋角)位置下,具有(>6 个月)和没有(<6 个月)举重衍生经验的受试者在等长大腿中部拉伸中的力量产生。使用混合设计 ANOVA 评估了拉位置和举重经验对峰值力、50、90、200 和 250ms 时的力的影响。所有测试变量的举重经验和拉位置均有统计学显著的主效应,峰值力、等比峰值力、200ms 时的力和 250ms 时的力均有统计学显著的交互效应。对于有举重经验的受试者,所有变量的计算效应大小均较小至较大,对于无举重经验的受试者,所有变量在不同位置的效应大小均较小至中等。研究的一个主要发现是,应使用直立身体姿势(125°膝和 145°髋),因为在该位置产生的力最大。在最大努力拉动过程中应测量实际关节角度,以确保身体位置接近预期位置。