Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Department of Audiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Ear Hear. 2021 Sep/Oct;42(5):1358-1372. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001035.
This study aimed to investigate effects of aging and duration of deafness on sensitivity of the auditory nerve (AN) to amplitude modulation (AM) cues delivered using trains of biphasic pulses in adult cochlear implant (CI) users.
There were 21 postlingually deaf adult CI users who participated in this study. All study participants used a Cochlear Nucleus device with a full electrode array insertion in the test ear. The stimulus was a 200-ms pulse train with a pulse rate of 2000 pulses per second. This carrier pulse train was sinusodially AM at four modulation rates (20, 40, 100, 200 Hz). The peak amplitude of the modulated pulse train was the maximum comfortable level (i.e., C level) measured for the carrier pulse train. The electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) to each of the 20 pulses selected over the last two AM cycles were measured. In addition, eCAPs to single pulses were measured with the probe levels corresponding to the levels of 20 selected pulses from each AM pulse train. There were seven electrodes across the array evaluated in 16 subjects (i.e., electrodes 3 or 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21). For the remaining five subjects, 4 to 5 electrodes were tested due to impedance issues or time constraints. The modulated response amplitude ratio (MRAR) was calculated as the ratio of the difference in the maximum and the minimum eCAP amplitude measured for the AM pulse train to that measured for the single pulse, and served as the dependent variable. Age at time of testing and duration of deafness measured/defined using three criteria served as the independent variables. Linear Mixed Models were used to assess the effects of age at testing and duration of deafness on the MRAR.
Age at testing had a strong, negative effect on the MRAR. For each subject, the duration of deafness varied substantially depending on how it was defined/measured, which demonstrates the difficulty of accurately measuring the duration of deafness in adult CI users. There was no clear or reliable trend showing a relationship between the MRAR measured at any AM rate and duration of deafness defined by any criteria. After controlling for the effect of age at testing, MRARs measured at 200 Hz and basal electrode locations (i.e., electrodes 3 and 6) were larger than those measured at any other AM rate and apical electrode locations (i.e., electrodes 18 and 21).
The AN sensitivity to AM cues implemented in the pulse-train stimulation significantly declines with advanced age. Accurately measuring duration of deafness in adult CI users is challenging, which, at least partially, might have accounted for the inconclusive findings in the relationship between the duration of deafness and the AN sensitivity to AM cues in this study.
本研究旨在探讨年龄和耳聋持续时间对成年人工耳蜗(CI)使用者对双相脉冲序列传输的幅度调制(AM)线索的听觉神经(AN)敏感性的影响。
共有 21 名后天性耳聋的成年 CI 用户参与了这项研究。所有研究参与者均使用 Cochlear Nucleus 设备,将全电极阵列插入测试耳。刺激为 200ms 脉冲串,脉冲率为 2000 个脉冲/秒。该载波脉冲串以四个调制率(20、40、100、200Hz)进行正弦 AM。调制脉冲串的峰值幅度为载波脉冲串的最大舒适水平(即 C 级)。测量了最后两个 AM 周期中 20 个调制脉冲中的每一个的电诱发复合动作电位(eCAP)。此外,还测量了每个 AM 脉冲串的 20 个选定脉冲的相应探针水平的单个脉冲的 eCAP。在 16 名受试者中评估了阵列中的 7 个电极(即电极 3 或 4、6、9、12、15、18 和 21)。对于其余 5 名受试者,由于阻抗问题或时间限制,测试了 4 到 5 个电极。调制响应幅度比(MRAR)定义为 AM 脉冲串的最大和最小 eCAP 幅度之间的差异与单个脉冲的幅度之比,并作为因变量。测试时的年龄和使用三种标准测量的耳聋持续时间作为自变量。线性混合模型用于评估测试时年龄和耳聋持续时间对 MRAR 的影响。
测试时的年龄对 MRAR 有很强的负面影响。对于每个受试者,耳聋持续时间的变化很大,具体取决于如何定义/测量,这表明在成年 CI 用户中准确测量耳聋持续时间具有挑战性。没有明确或可靠的趋势表明,以任何标准定义的任何 AM 率测量的 MRAR 与耳聋持续时间之间存在关系。在控制测试时年龄的影响后,在 200Hz 测量的 MRAR 和基底电极位置(即电极 3 和 6)大于在任何其他 AM 率和顶极电极位置(即电极 18 和 21)测量的 MRAR。
脉冲串刺激中 AM 线索的 AN 敏感性随年龄增长显著下降。在成年 CI 用户中准确测量耳聋持续时间具有挑战性,这至少部分解释了本研究中耳聋持续时间与 AM 线索对 AN 敏感性之间关系的不确定结果。