Lee Jae-Hoon, Veronese Mattia, Liow Jeih-San, Morse Cheryl L, Montero Santamaria Jose A, Haskali Mohammad B, Zoghbi Sami S, Pike Victor W, Innis Robert B, Zanotti-Fregonara Paolo
Molecular Imaging Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
EJNMMI Res. 2021 Apr 1;11(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13550-021-00780-z.
Previous studies found that the positron emission tomography (PET) radioligand [F]LSN3316612 accurately quantified O-GlcNAcase in human brain using a two-tissue compartment model (2TCM). This study sought to assess kinetic model(s) as an alternative to 2TCM for quantifying [F]LSN3316612 binding, particularly in order to generate good-quality parametric images.
The current study reanalyzed data from a previous study of 10 healthy volunteers who underwent both test and retest PET scans with [F]LSN3316612. Kinetic analysis was performed at the region level with 2TCM using 120-min PET data and arterial input function, which was considered as the gold standard. Quantification was then obtained at both the region and voxel levels using Logan plot, Ichise's multilinear analysis-1 (MA1), standard spectral analysis (SA), and impulse response function at 120 min (IRF). To avoid arterial sampling, a noninvasive relative quantification (standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR)) was also tested using the corpus callosum as a pseudo-reference region. Venous samples were also assessed to see whether they could substitute for arterial ones.
Logan and MA1 generated parametric images of good visual quality and their total distribution volume (V) values at both the region and voxel levels were strongly correlated with 2TCM-derived V (r = 0.96-0.99) and showed little bias (up to - 8%). SA was more weakly correlated to 2TCM-derived V (r = 0.93-0.98) and was more biased (~ 16%). IRF showed a strong correlation with 2TCM-derived V (r = 0.96) but generated noisier parametric images. All techniques were comparable to 2TCM in terms of test-retest variability and reliability except IRF, which gave significantly worse results. Noninvasive SUVR values were not correlated with 2TCM-derived V, and arteriovenous equilibrium was never reached.
Compared to SA and IRF, Logan and MA1 are more suitable alternatives to 2TCM for quantifying [F]LSN3316612 and generating good-quality parametric images.
先前的研究发现,正电子发射断层扫描(PET)放射性配体[F]LSN3316612使用双组织室模型(2TCM)可准确量化人脑中的O-连接N-乙酰葡糖胺酶。本研究旨在评估动力学模型作为2TCM的替代方法来量化[F]LSN3316612的结合,特别是为了生成高质量的参数图像。
本研究重新分析了先前一项针对10名健康志愿者的研究数据,这些志愿者接受了[F]LSN3316612的测试和复测PET扫描。使用120分钟的PET数据和动脉输入函数,在区域水平上用2TCM进行动力学分析,将其视为金标准。然后使用Logan图、市濑的多线性分析-1(MA1)、标准谱分析(SA)和120分钟时的脉冲响应函数(IRF)在区域和体素水平上进行量化。为避免动脉采样,还使用胼胝体作为伪参考区域测试了无创相对量化(标准化摄取值比率(SUVR))。还评估了静脉样本,以查看它们是否可以替代动脉样本。
Logan和MA1生成了视觉质量良好的参数图像,它们在区域和体素水平上的总分布容积(V)值与2TCM得出的V值高度相关(r = 0.96 - 0.99),且偏差很小(高达-8%)。SA与2TCM得出的V值相关性较弱(r = 0.93 - 0.98),偏差更大(约16%)。IRF与2TCM得出的V值显示出很强的相关性(r = 0.96),但生成的参数图像噪声更大。除IRF的重测变异性和可靠性明显较差外,所有技术在这方面均与2TCM相当。无创SUVR值与2TCM得出的V值不相关,且从未达到动静脉平衡。
与SA和IRF相比,Logan和MA1是比2TCM更适合量化[F]LSN3316612并生成高质量参数图像的替代方法。