• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿普加评分的可靠性和有效性评价。

Review of the Reliability and Validity of the Apgar Score.

机构信息

College of Nursing, University of Colorado Denver, Denver.

出版信息

Adv Neonatal Care. 2022 Feb 1;22(1):28-34. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000859.

DOI:10.1097/ANC.0000000000000859
PMID:33797428
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Apgar score is the most common score used to quantify neonatal status after birth. It is routinely used in clinical practice and research. However, since its introduction there have been significant changes in peripartum and neonatal management, our understanding of neonatal physiology, and changes in data analysis capabilities.

PURPOSE

To assess the Apgar score's reliability and validity in the context of today's clinical and research environments.

METHOD

PubMed was searched using the term "Apgar." Just over 22,000 titles were identified. Full-text articles were obtained if they addressed the Apgar score's use, reliability, and validity, or if the score was a primary outcome measure. This was followed by a hand search using the same criteria. The 505 identified articles build the basis for this discussion of the Apgar score's reliability and validity.

FINDINGS

Multiple positive and negative aspects of the Apgar score's reliability and validity were identified. Some facets needed to evaluate reliability and validity do not seem to have been addressed in the literature. Overall, the identified concerns can introduce bias into outcomes obtained via the use of the Apgar score in both clinical practice and research.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The Apgar score is no longer used to determine neonatal management in the delivery room.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

The use of the Apgar score in research may introduce bias into outcomes. As discussed in the Video Abstract, researchers need to address and improve the score's weaknesses or consider developing a new tool better suited to today's research needs.

VIDEO ABSTRACT AVAILABLE AT

https://journals.lww.com/advancesinneonatalcare/Pages/videogallery.aspx?autoPlay=false&videoId=45.

摘要

背景

阿普加评分是目前用于量化新生儿出生后状况的最常用评分方法。它在临床实践和研究中被广泛应用。然而,自引入以来,围产期和新生儿管理、我们对新生儿生理学的理解以及数据分析能力都发生了重大变化。

目的

评估阿普加评分在当前临床和研究环境下的可靠性和有效性。

方法

使用术语“Apgar”在 PubMed 上进行检索,共检索到 22000 多个标题。如果文章涉及阿普加评分的使用、可靠性和有效性,或者评分是主要的结果测量指标,则获取全文。然后使用相同的标准进行手动检索。这 505 篇确定的文章为本文讨论阿普加评分的可靠性和有效性提供了依据。

结果

确定了阿普加评分可靠性和有效性的多个积极和消极方面。一些评估可靠性和有效性的方面似乎并未在文献中得到解决。总的来说,所确定的问题可能会在临床实践和研究中使用阿普加评分时引入偏倚。

实践意义

阿普加评分不再用于决定产房内新生儿的管理。

研究意义

在研究中使用阿普加评分可能会使研究结果产生偏差。正如视频摘要中讨论的那样,研究人员需要解决和改进评分的弱点,或者考虑开发一个更适合当前研究需求的新工具。

视频摘要可在以下网址获取

https://journals.lww.com/advancesinneonatalcare/Pages/videogallery.aspx?autoPlay=false&videoId=45.

相似文献

1
Review of the Reliability and Validity of the Apgar Score.阿普加评分的可靠性和有效性评价。
Adv Neonatal Care. 2022 Feb 1;22(1):28-34. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000859.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Accuracy and Interrater Agreement of Registered Nurses' Assignment of Apgar Scores to Standardized Clinical Vignettes.注册护士对标准化临床病例进行阿氏评分的准确性及评分者间一致性
Clin Nurs Res. 2023 Mar;32(3):452-462. doi: 10.1177/10547738231155266. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
4
Becoming an Antiracist Neonatal Community.成为一个反种族主义的新生儿科社区。
Adv Neonatal Care. 2021 Feb 1;21(1):9-15. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000829.
5
Neonatal Sepsis: A Review of Pathophysiology and Current Management Strategies.新生儿败血症:病理生理学与当前管理策略综述
Adv Neonatal Care. 2021 Feb 1;21(1):49-60. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000769.
6
A Review of Feeding Practices in Infants With Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.新生儿戒断综合征患儿喂养实践的研究综述。
Adv Neonatal Care. 2020 Dec;20(6):430-439. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000780.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Neonatal Eating Assessment Tool-Bottle-Feeding (NeoEAT-Bottle-Feeding).新生儿喂养评估工具-奶瓶喂养版(NeoEAT-奶瓶喂养版)的因子结构和心理测量学特性
Adv Neonatal Care. 2018 Jun;18(3):232-242. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000494.
9
The apgar score and its components in the preterm infant.早产儿的阿氏评分及其组成部分。
Pediatrics. 1998 Jan;101(1 Pt 1):77-81. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.1.77.
10
Designing and Implementing a Skin Care Protocol for Infants With Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome to Decrease Rates of Diaper Dermatitis.为患有新生儿戒断综合征的婴儿设计并实施皮肤护理方案以降低尿布皮炎发生率。
Adv Neonatal Care. 2022 Feb 1;22(1):35-41. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000898.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive model for feeding intolerance in neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy during therapeutic hypothermia.治疗性低温期间新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病喂养不耐受的预测模型
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 3;15(1):28325. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14085-x.
2
[Monitoring and evaluation indicators of Freestanding Birth Centers: results of the study Births in Brazilian Birthing Centers].[独立分娩中心的监测与评估指标:巴西分娩中心分娩情况研究结果]
Cad Saude Publica. 2025 Jul 21;41(7):e00175024. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPT175024. eCollection 2025.
3
Prevalence and factors associated with low 5th minute APGAR score among mothers who birth through emergency cesarean section: prospective cross-sectional study in Ethiopia.
急诊剖宫产分娩母亲中第5分钟阿氏评分低的患病率及相关因素:埃塞俄比亚的前瞻性横断面研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Mar 25;25(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07456-9.
4
Determinants of Neonatal Mortality at a Referral Paediatric Hospital in Angola: A Case-Control Study Using Theoretical Frameworks.安哥拉一家转诊儿科医院新生儿死亡率的决定因素:一项运用理论框架的病例对照研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 30;21(12):1609. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121609.
5
Systematic review of Apgar scores & cyanosis in Black, Asian, and ethnic minority infants.对黑人、亚裔及少数族裔婴儿的阿氏评分与发绀情况的系统评价。
Pediatr Res. 2025 Feb;97(3):939-952. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03543-3. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
6
Maternal and Fetal Risk Factors for Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: A Retrospective Study.新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病的母婴危险因素:一项回顾性研究
Int J Gen Med. 2023 Feb 13;16:537-545. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S394202. eCollection 2023.
7
Validity of Apgar Score as an Indicator of Neonatal SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Scoping Review.阿氏评分作为新生儿新型冠状病毒感染指标的有效性:一项范围综述。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 11;8:782376. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.782376. eCollection 2021.