Michel Alexandra D, Lowe Nancy K
University of Hawaii, Honolulu, USA.
University of Colorado, Larkspur, USA.
Clin Nurs Res. 2023 Mar;32(3):452-462. doi: 10.1177/10547738231155266. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
The purpose of our study was to test whether registered nurses assign the correct Apgar score when provided all pertinent data, whether they assign an Apgar score even if all pertinent data are not provided, and to evaluate the Apgar score's interrater agreement. We conducted a REDCap survey and provided nurses with color photograph/vignette combinations of neonates, some of which lacked pertinent data points needed to correctly assign Apgar scores. Over 90% of study participants assigned Apgar scores even if data points for heart rate or respiratory effort were omitted. Participants' correct assignment of the component score for respiratory effort was affected by the description of the respiratory effort and whether neonatal heart rate was known. Interrater agreement was generally low to moderate. Our findings are consistent with earlier findings and support the conclusion that the Apgar score requires significant revision or needs to be retired and replaced.
我们研究的目的是测试注册护士在获得所有相关数据时是否能正确给出阿氏评分,即使未提供所有相关数据时他们是否仍会给出阿氏评分,并评估阿氏评分的评分者间一致性。我们进行了一项REDCap调查,并向护士提供新生儿的彩色照片/病例组合,其中一些缺少正确给出阿氏评分所需的相关数据点。超过90%的研究参与者即使在心率或呼吸努力的数据点被省略的情况下仍给出了阿氏评分。参与者对呼吸努力分项评分的正确赋值受到呼吸努力描述以及新生儿心率是否已知的影响。评分者间一致性总体较低至中等。我们的研究结果与早期研究结果一致,并支持以下结论:阿氏评分需要进行重大修订,或者需要停用并被取代。