Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, USA.
Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York, USA.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Jun 15;42(9):2677-2690. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25347. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
Cognitive control is built upon the interactions of multiple brain regions. It is currently unclear whether the involved regions are temporally separable in relation to different cognitive processes and how these regions are temporally associated in relation to different task performances. Here, using stop-signal task data acquired from 119 healthy participants, we showed that concurrent and poststop cognitive controls were associated with temporally distinct but interrelated neural mechanisms. Specifically, concurrent cognitive control activated regions in the cingulo-opercular network (including the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex [dACC], insula, and thalamus), together with superior temporal gyrus, secondary motor areas, and visual cortex; while regions in the fronto-parietal network (including the lateral prefrontal cortex [lPFC] and inferior parietal lobule) and cerebellum were only activated during poststop cognitive control. The associations of activities between concurrent and poststop regions were dependent on task performance, with the most notable difference in the cerebellum. Importantly, while concurrent and poststop signals were significantly correlated during successful cognitive control, concurrent activations during erroneous trials were only correlated with posterror activations in the fronto-parietal network but not cerebellum. Instead, the cerebellar activation during posterror cognitive control was likely to be driven secondarily by posterror activation in the lPFC. Further, a dynamic causal modeling analysis demonstrated that postsuccess cognitive control was associated with inhibitory connectivity from the lPFC to cerebellum, while excitatory connectivity from the lPFC to cerebellum was present during posterror cognitive control. Overall, these findings suggest dissociable but temporally related neural mechanisms underlying concurrent, postsuccess, and posterror cognitive control processes in healthy individuals.
认知控制是建立在多个大脑区域相互作用的基础上的。目前尚不清楚涉及的区域在不同认知过程中是否在时间上是可分离的,以及这些区域在不同任务表现中是如何在时间上相关联的。在这里,我们使用从 119 名健康参与者中获得的停止信号任务数据,表明并发和后停止认知控制与时间上不同但相互关联的神经机制有关。具体来说,并发认知控制激活了扣带-顶叶网络中的区域(包括背侧前扣带皮层[dACC]、脑岛和丘脑),以及颞上回、次级运动区和视觉皮层;而额顶网络中的区域(包括外侧前额叶皮层[lPFC]和下顶叶)和小脑仅在停止后认知控制期间被激活。并发和停止后区域之间活动的关联取决于任务表现,小脑的差异最为显著。重要的是,虽然在成功的认知控制过程中,并发和停止信号显著相关,但在错误试验中的并发激活仅与额顶网络中的后错误激活相关,而与小脑无关。相反,小脑在后错误认知控制期间的激活可能主要是由 lPFC 的后错误激活驱动的。此外,动态因果建模分析表明,后成功认知控制与从 lPFC 到小脑的抑制性连接有关,而从 lPFC 到小脑的兴奋性连接存在于后错误认知控制期间。总的来说,这些发现表明,在健康个体中,并发、后成功和后错误认知控制过程有可分离但时间相关的神经机制。