Suppr超能文献

右侧额下回和前脑岛在抑制控制中的可分离作用:来自多个数据集的内在和任务相关功能分区、连通性及反应特征分析的证据

Dissociable roles of right inferior frontal cortex and anterior insula in inhibitory control: evidence from intrinsic and task-related functional parcellation, connectivity, and response profile analyses across multiple datasets.

作者信息

Cai Weidong, Ryali Srikanth, Chen Tianwen, Li Chiang-Shan R, Menon Vinod

机构信息

Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and

Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2014 Oct 29;34(44):14652-67. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3048-14.2014.

Abstract

The right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC) and the right anterior insula (rAI) have been implicated consistently in inhibitory control, but their differential roles are poorly understood. Here we use multiple quantitative techniques to dissociate the functional organization and roles of the rAI and rIFC. We first conducted a meta-analysis of 70 published inhibitory control studies to generate a commonly activated right fronto-opercular cortex volume of interest (VOI). We then segmented this VOI using two types of features: (1) intrinsic brain activity; and (2) stop-signal task-evoked hemodynamic response profiles. In both cases, segmentation algorithms identified two stable and distinct clusters encompassing the rAI and rIFC. The rAI and rIFC clusters exhibited several distinct functional characteristics. First, the rAI showed stronger intrinsic and task-evoked functional connectivity with the anterior cingulate cortex, whereas the rIFC had stronger intrinsic and task-evoked functional connectivity with dorsomedial prefrontal and lateral fronto-parietal cortices. Second, the rAI showed greater activation than the rIFC during Unsuccessful, but not Successful, Stop trials, and multivoxel response profiles in the rAI, but not the rIFC, accurately differentiated between Successful and Unsuccessful Stop trials. Third, activation in the rIFC, but not rAI, predicted individual differences in inhibitory control abilities. Crucially, these findings were replicated in two independent cohorts of human participants. Together, our findings provide novel quantitative evidence for the dissociable roles of the rAI and rIFC in inhibitory control. We suggest that the rAI is particularly important for detecting behaviorally salient events, whereas the rIFC is more involved in implementing inhibitory control.

摘要

右下额叶皮质(rIFC)和右前岛叶(rAI)一直被认为与抑制控制有关,但其不同作用却鲜为人知。在此,我们运用多种定量技术来区分rAI和rIFC的功能组织及作用。我们首先对70项已发表的抑制控制研究进行了荟萃分析,以生成一个共同激活的右侧额眶皮质感兴趣区(VOI)。然后,我们使用两种特征对该VOI进行分割:(1)大脑内在活动;(2)停止信号任务诱发的血流动力学反应特征。在这两种情况下,分割算法都识别出了两个稳定且不同的簇,分别包含rAI和rIFC。rAI和rIFC簇表现出几个不同的功能特征。首先,rAI与前扣带回皮质表现出更强的内在和任务诱发功能连接,而rIFC与背内侧前额叶和外侧额顶叶皮质有更强的内在和任务诱发功能连接。其次,在不成功的停止试验中,rAI的激活程度高于rIFC,但在成功的停止试验中并非如此,并且rAI而非rIFC的多体素反应特征能够准确区分成功和不成功的停止试验。第三,rIFC而非rAI的激活能够预测抑制控制能力的个体差异。至关重要的是,这些发现在两组独立的人类参与者中得到了重复验证。总之,我们的研究结果为rAI和rIFC在抑制控制中的可分离作用提供了新的定量证据。我们认为,rAI对于检测行为上显著的事件尤为重要,而rIFC则更多地参与抑制控制的实施。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on.抑制作用与右下额前皮质:十年研究。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;18(4):177-85. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.003. Epub 2014 Jan 15.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验